Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 16 Oct 2024 · CNR MHCC010072162018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 N.M. No. 2230 of 2018 CNR: MHCC01-007216-2018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL C0URT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2230 OF 2018 IN L.C.SUIT NO.1418 OF 2011 Iqbal Mohamed Shafi Agwan .. Plaintiff V/s. Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay .. Defendant Appearance:- Adv. Khatib for plaintiff. Adv. Sachin Vajale for defendant/BMC CORAM : HIS HONOUR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI. R. M. MISHRA CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C.R. NO.05). DATE : 16/10/2024. ORDER By this Notice of Motion, the plaintiff has prayed for the relief of temporary injunction restraining the defendant/MCGM from implementing and/or taking any action pursuant to the impugned notice dt. 10/02/2011 under Section 351 of the MMC Act and order dt. 21/05/2011 towards the notice structure or any part thereof, pending the hearing and final decision of the suit. 2 Perused affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion and reply-cum-additional written statement of the defendant/MCGM. Heard both sides. -- 1 of 5 -- 2 N.M. No. 2230 of 2018 3 In the light of respective submissions, I have carefully gone through the entire facts and circumstances on record. While considering the facts on record, it will be just and appropriate to reproduce the unauthorized construction as alleged in the schedule of the impugned notice which is as under. “unauthorised construction of first floor with brick masonry wall and ladi coba floor and A.C. sheet roof adm. 10’ x 13’ of ht (6’ 6” +7’ 6”), room No. 22, near St. Bapista Garden adjacent to Jasmine C.H.S., Mazgaon.” 4 Having gone through the copies of documents tendered on record on the part of the plaintiff, it can be seen that the plaintiff has produced the copy of postal envelop addressed in the name of his father at First Floor, Lohar Khata, R.No. 22, near Bhandarwada Hill, Mazgaon, Post Cards having a seal of the Postal Department of the year 1961 onwards, copy of application dt. 29/04/1958 issued by the father of the plaintiff to the Hydraulic Engineer having the seal of the Water Works Department by way of acknowledgment of the receipt of the said letter on 29/04/1958. Another copy of letter dt. 12/05/1958 issued by Hydraulic Engineer to the father of the plaintiff shows that water connection permission was granted to the father of the plaintiff for room No.22, first floor, near Bhandarwada Hill, behind Polson Company, Mazgaon. Another significant document produced on record is the copy of repair permission dt. 18/11/1963 made by the father of the plaintiff through Architect to the Assistant Engineer (Bldg. Dept.) and copy of permission dt. 23/03/1964 granted by the Assistant Engineer, Bldg. Dept., E Division to the existing first floor, R.No.22 of Mazgaon (W). Moreover, copy of approved plan dt. 23/03/1964 is also -- 2 of 5 -- 3 N.M. No. 2230 of 2018 filed on record. 5 In the light of these documents, the plaintiff has successfully discharged the initial burden by showing that the suit premises i.e. the R.No.22 near St. Bapista Garden is in existence since 1958. Therefore, onus shifts upon the defendant/MCGM to prove that these documents are pertaining to some other structure. In this regard, not only in the speaking order dt. 03/08/2017 but in the reply-cum- written statement, the defendant/MCGM has also come with a case that these documents i.e. the correspondence, repair plan and approved repair plan are related to some other structure in the close proximity of nearby locality of the same address. It was, therefore, incumbent on the part of the defendant/MCGM to show as to for which premises this repair permission was granted by the competent authority of the defendant. However, except bare contention, nothing is brought on record to show that these documents are not pertaining to the suit premises. 6 Another significant thing to be taken into consideration is that the defendant/MCGM has not disputed the genuineness of these documents and it is nowhere contended that these documents are either false or fabricated. In fact, while considering the equitable relief of injunction, there is no need to go into the merit of the case and on the basis of material available on record, the Court has to find out whether prima facie case is made out or not. In this backdrop, if the copies of aforesaid correspondence having seal of postal department coupled with the application for permission to repair the suit premises and granting of such permission and copy of the approved repair plan are -- 3 of 5 -- 4 N.M. No. 2230 of 2018 taken into consideration, no reason appears to me to discard these documents in the absence of anything contrary brought on record. As discussed earlier, except bare contention, nothing is brought on the part of the defendant/MCGM to show that these documents are pertaining to some other premises which is altogether different as compared to the suit premises. In these circumstances, I come to the conclusion that the plaintiff has made out prima facie case and balance of convenience also lies in favour of the plaintiff. Therefore, if the interim relief is not granted as prayed for, it will cause great prejudice to the plaintiff which cannot be compensated in terms of money. In the result, following order is passed. ORDER 1 Notice of Motion No. 2230 of 2018 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 The defendant/MCGM is hereby temporarily restrained from acting upon the impugned notice dt. 10/02/2011 and order dt. 21/05/2011 in respect of the suit premises or any part thereof, pending the hearing and final decision of the suit. 3 Costs in cause. 4 Notice of Motion stands disposed of accordingly. Date:16/10/2024. (R. M. Mishra ) Dictated on :16/10/2024. Judge, City Civil Court, Typed on :16/10/2024. Gr.Mumbai. Signed on :16/10/2024. -- 4 of 5 -- 5 N.M. No. 2230 of 2018 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 16/10/2024. 01.38 p.m. (Santosh B. Sawant ) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Shri. R. M. Mishra (C.R.No.05) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 16/10/2024. JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 16/10/2024. JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 16/10/2024. -- 5 of 5 --
