Full Order Text
Order 1 · 03 Sept 2019 · CNR MHCC010071832018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT NO.682/2018 1 Received on : 15062018 Registered on : 02072018 Decided on : 03092019 Duration :01Y 02M 19D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 682 of 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010071832018 Shankar Lachamandas Lakhani,Age 31yrs., of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant having his address at A603, Valensiya Building, Bhakati Park, Wadala(E),Mumbai400037. ...Plaintiff Versus 1. Abid Ramzan Khan Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant having his address at Room No.5, Ground Floor, Mujawar Chawl, Shaikh Mistry Dargha Road, Antophill, Wadala East, Mumbai400 037. 2. Sattar Patel Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant having his address at Room No.210,New Bharat Nagar, Mahul Gaon, Vashinaka, Chembur, Mumbai400 074. ….Defendants Appearances: Advocate Mr.Ramesh Jain and Mrs.Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. -- 1 of 4 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.682/2018 2 CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 3RD SEPTEMBER 2019 J U D G M E N T This is a suit for recovery of Rs.2,05,405/(Rupees Two Lacs Five Thousand Four Hundred and Five only). 2. Plaintiff case in nut shell is that on 07/03/2016 defendant No. 1 for valuable consideration of Rs.1,50,000/ received from the plaintiff, drew a bill of exchange directing defendant No.2 to pay plaintiff Rs.1,50,000/ on demand. On 07/04/2016 plaintiff presented the bill of exchange to defendant No.2 but it was dishonoured. Defendant No.1 also refused to pay the said amount. Both defendants are in default of Rs.2,05,405/(Rupees Two Lacs Five Thousand Four Hundred and Five only). Hence, this suit. 3. The defendants were served with summons for appearance but they remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against them. 4. From the material on record following points come for my determination and my findings with reasons are as follows: POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff proves that defendants have executed bill of exchange for valuable consideration of Rs.1,50,000/? Yes -- 2 of 4 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.682/2018 3 2. Whether plaintiff proves that amount of Rs.2,05,405/(Rupees Two Lacs Five Thousand Four Hundred and Five only) is due and recoverable from defendants? Yes 3. Whether plaintiff is entitled for recovery of Rs.2,05,405/(Rupees Two Lacs Five Thousand Four Hundred and Five only) along with interest as claimed? Yes 4. What order and decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4. 5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To prove its case plaintiff examined himself vide Exh.6 and filed original bill of exchange and demand notice. 6. Heard Ld.Counself for plaintiff. 7. Affidavit is supported by documentary evidence. The original bill of exchange and advocate demand notice shows that on 07/03/2016 Defendant No. 1 for valuable consideration of Rs.1,50,000/ received from the plaintiff, drew a bill of exchange directing defendant No.2 to pay plaintiff Rs.1,50,000/ on demand. On 07/04/2016 plaintiff presented the bill of exchange to defendant No.2 but it was dishonoured. Defendant No.1 also refused to pay the said amount. Both defendants are in default of Rs.2,05,405/(Rupees Two Lacs Five Thousand Four Hundred and Five only). As far as rate of interest is concerned plaintiff has claimed interest @ 18% p.a.As per section 80 of -- 3 of 4 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.682/2018 4 N.I.Act 1882 such rate of interest can be granted. Therefore point No.1 to 3 are answered as 'Yes' and following order is passed. ORDER 1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs. 2. Defendants do jointly and severally pay to plaintiff amount of Rs.2,05,405/(Rupees Two Lacs Five Thousand Four Hundred and Five only) with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till full and final realization. 3. Court fee be refunded as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (M.S.LONE) Judge, Date: 03/09/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 03/09/2019 Transcribed on : 03/09/2019 Signed on : 09/09/2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 11/09/2019 at 11.00a.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 03/09/2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 09/09/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 11/09/2019 -- 4 of 4 --
