Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 09 Jan 2026 · CNR MHCC010071562019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: ..1.. Commercial Summary Suit No.72/2025 MHCC010071562019 Presented on : 10/07/19 Registered on : 31/08/19 Decided on : 09/01/26 Duration : 06 Y : 05 M : 30 D Exhibit : 22 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, GREATER MUMBAI AT MAZGAON COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.72 OF 2025 CHAMADIA AGENCY LLP, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO.16/A, CTS - 1194/15-16-17, SHOP NO.2, SHIVAJINAGAR, PUNE-411 005, MAHARASHTRA AND ALSO HAS ITS OFFICE AT CHAMADIA AGENCY LLP C/O ROHIT MAMJI NISAR PRABHAT APARTMENT, GODOWN NO.1 A, GROUND FLOOR, CTS NO.4/124, GUNPOWDER ROAD, MAZGAON MUMBAI- 400 010. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ..Plaintiff Versus 1. FASTSPEED MULTI TRADING AND SERVICES PVT. LTD. A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 602 B-67, MORESHWAR SHANTI NAGAR, CHS LTD. SECTOR-1, SHANTI NAGAR, MIRA ROAD EAST, THANE 401107. And administrative office at MUMBAI LOCAL MINT MART, SHOP NO.9, KOHINOOR CORNER BUILDING, VEER SAVARKAR MARG, PRABHADEVI, MUMBAI-400 025. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] -- 1 of 6 -- ..2.. Commercial Summary Suit No.72/2025 2. 3. RIZWAN AHMEED SIDDIQUI ADULT, INDIAN INHABITANT, OCC: BUSINESS DIRECTOR IN FASTSPEED MULTI TRADING AND SERVICES PVT. LIMITED R/AT, 301, PLOT 11, NEELKANTH APARTMENT, S.S. NO. 517, NAYA NAGAR, MIRA ROAD, BHAYANDER MIRA ROAD, THANE- 401107. TASNEEM RASHID SAYYED ADULT, INDIAN INHABITANT, OCC: BUSINESS DIRECTOR IN FASTSPEED MULTI TRADING AND SERVICES PVT. LIMITED R/AT, T81, MAKHDUMAIYA NAGAR, DARYASARANG ZOPADPATI, KHAND 4, MAHIM (WEST), MUMBAI- 400 016. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ..Defendants Appearance :- Ld. Adv. Atharva Hadawale i/b Dhanuka and Partners for plaintiff. None for defendants. (Ex-parte) CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SACHIN SURYAKANT PATIL COURT ROOM NO.32. DATE : 09/01/2026. J U D G M E N T 1) This commercial summary suit is filed for recovery of amount. 2) The facts in brief are as under - Defendant had purchased goods from the plaintiff on credit. Accordingly on supply of goods plaintiff raised various invoices dated 31/05/2018 of Rs.2,93,990/- GST/CA-MG/5564, 01/06/2018 of Rs.1,04,759/- GST/CA-MG/5656, 04/06/2018 of Rs.81,479/- GST/CA- MG/5933 and dated 04/06/2018 of Rs.1,04,759/- GST/CA/MG/5934 . The material delivered to defendants was worth Rs.5,84,987/-. Defendant No.1 had issued cheque bearing No. 020828 for the amount -- 2 of 6 -- ..3.. Commercial Summary Suit No.72/2025 of Rs.5,84,987/- in favour of plaintiff for payment of the amount. However, it got dishonored for the reasons fund insufficient. Thereafter, plaintiff issued the demand notice on 29.09.2018. However, defendant did not make the payment. Amount of Rs.6,49,228/- is due from the defendant alongwith interest. Hence, the Suit for recovery of amount. 3) The writ of summons was served upon the defendants. Defendants did not appear. Hence, matter proceeded ex-parte against the defendants. 4) Heard the arguments of plaintiff. In view of aforesaid facts, following points arise for my determination. I have recorded my decisions thereon for the reasons as under : Sr. No. POINTS DECISIONS 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of sum of Rs.6,49,228/- with interest @ 18% P.A. ? ...Partly Yes 2. What order and decree? ...As per final order. R E A S O N S 5) Plaintiff's witness Mr. Govind Agarwal has filed evidence affidavit at Exhibit-11. Plaintiff has relied upon documentary evidence produced at Exh-14 to 20. AS TO POINT NOS.1 & 2 :- 6) PW-1 Govind Agarwal has deposed that, Defendant had purchased goods from the plaintiff on credit. Accordingly on supply of goods plaintiff raised various invoices dated 31/05/2018 of Rs.2,93,990/- GST/CA-MG/5564, 01/06/2018 of Rs.1,04,759/- -- 3 of 6 -- ..4.. Commercial Summary Suit No.72/2025 GST/CA-MG/5656, 04/06/2018 of Rs.81,479/- GST/CA-MG/5933 and dated 04/06/2018 of Rs.1,04,759/- GST/CA/MG/5934 . The material delivered to defendants was worth Rs.5,84,987/-. Defendant No.1 had issued cheque bearing No. 020828 for the amount of Rs.5,84,987/- in favour of plaintiff for payment of the amount. However, it got dishonored for the reasons fund insufficient. Thereafter, plaintiff issued the demand notice on 29.09.2018. However, defendant did not make the payment. Amount of Rs.6,49,228/- is due from the defendant alongwith interest. 7) On perusal of documents produced by the plaintiff it is evident that plaintiff had supplied goods to the defendant and raised various invoices for amount of Rs.5,84,987/-. Defendant had issued cheque in favour of plaintiff which got dishonored for the reason fund insufficient (Exhibit-16). As per the evidence of plaintiff. Defendant has not appeared and contested the suit. Therefore, the evidence of plaintiff has remained unchallenged. Plaintiff has claimed interest @ 18% P.A. on principal amount of Rs.5,84,987/-. However, plaintiff has not produced any documents to show that defendant agreed to pay interest @ 18% P.A. The invoices filed by the plaintiff do not mention the interest @ 18% P.A. Therefore, in my view interest claimed by the plaintiff seen to be excessive. In present case, interest @ 10% P.A will meet the ends of justice. Hence, while answering point No.1 in partly affirmative, I pass the following order. ORDER 1. Commercial Summary Suit No.72 of 2025 is partly decreed with costs. 2. Defendants shall jointly and severally pay amount of -- 4 of 6 -- ..5.. Commercial Summary Suit No.72/2025 Rs.5,84,987/- (Rupees Five Lakh Eighty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Seven Only) to plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10% p.a. from 29.09.2018 till realization of the amount. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. (Judgment dictated and pronounced in open Court) ( Sachin Suryakant Patil ) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, Court No.32 Dated : 09/01/2026 Dictated and typed on : 09/01/2026. Signed by HHJ on : 09/01/2026. -- 5 of 6 -- ..6.. Commercial Summary Suit No.72/2025 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” Upload Date Upload Time Mahesh S. Lugade Name of Stenographer09/01/26 5.30 p.m. Name of the Judge (With C.R. No.) HHJ SACHIN SURYAKANT PATIL (COURT ROOM NO.32) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT / ORDER 09/01/26 JUDGMENT / ORDER signed by P.O. on 09/01/26 JUDGMENT / ORDER uploaded on 09/01/26 -- 6 of 6 --
