Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 03 Mar 2020 · CNR MHCC010071312018
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: MHCC010071312018 Presented on 14.06.2018 Registered on 20.07.2018 Decided on 03.03.2020 Duration Yrs. M. Days 01 07 14 CNR No. EXH. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.1813 OF 2018 Mr. Venkateshwararao Satyanarayan Masaram Proprietor of M/s. Vishvak Creation, Hindu, Adult, Aged about 45 years, Indian Inhabitant, carrying out business at 162, 1/2, Kamgar Nagar No.2, N.M. Joshi Marg, New Prabhadevi, Dhan Mill Naka, Mumbai – 400 013. ...Plaintiff. V/s. Proprietor of Nakshatra Fashion Hindu, Adult, Age not known, Indian Inhabitant, Carrying out business at 1966, HAL 3rd, Stage, New Thippsandra Main Road, Bengaluru – 560 087. ....Defendant. MHCC01-007131-2018 -- 1 of 7 -- S.C. Suit 1813 of 18 .. j/2 .. Appearances: Ld. Adv Mr. Prakash Deshpande for plaintiff. None present for defendant. Suit proceeded ex-parte against defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI SHANKAR G.BORLEPWAR (C.R.No.20) DATED : 3rd March, 2020 J U D G M E N T (Ex-parte) 1. Plaintiff filed this suit for recovery of amount. 2. In brief, it is contention of the plaintiff that plaintiff is a proprietor of M/s. Vishvak Creation, carrying out his business as address mentioned in the title clause of the plaint. He was engaged in the business of stitching and / or manufacturing of Formal and Technological Trousers and selling goods on a commercial basis. 3. The defendant is a proprietor of Nakshatra Fashion, situated at 1966, HAL, 3rd , stage, New Thippsandra Main Road, Bengaluru – 560 087. He is engaged in selling of the finished garments along with the finished goods of the plaintiff after buying the goods from the plaintiff. Defendant approached the plaintiff in Mumbai and bought the finished goods from the plaintiff at Mumbai. The defendant did not make payment of the total bill amount of Rs.36,888/-. Plaintiff contacted defendant through telephonic media to pay entire balance amount but in vain. Plaintiff is entitled for the said sum of Rs.36,888/- alongwith interest @ 18% p.a. Plaintiff delivered the goods to the defendant on 03.09.2013 therefore, plaintiff is entitled to charge -- 2 of 7 -- S.C. Suit 1813 of 18 .. j/3 .. interest at the rate of 18% p.a. principal amount of Rs.36,888/- from 03.09.2015. Therefore, suit be decreed as prayed for. 4. The suit is proceeded ex-parte against the defendant as per Roznama dated 13.02.2019. 5. Plaintiff examined himself by filing evidence affidavit at Exh.3. He relied upon documents which are filed at Exh.4. 6. I have heard Learned Advocate appearing for the plaintiff. 7. Plaintiff supported his contention made in the plaint by filing evidence affidavit. He states that defendant approached him in Mumbai. Thereafter, defendant bought the finished goods from him at Mumbai. As per the order of defendant and as per the standard practice he dispatched the goods from Mumbai on 13.09.2015 through cargo services Shreeji Transport Services situated at Mumbai. The defendant did not pay total bill amount of Rs.36,888/-. He sent notice dated 02.11.2017 through his advocate to the defendant and thereby call upon to pay the said amount. Defendant received said Notice on 06.11.2015. 8. PW 1 further states in his evidence affidavit that he seeks to recover a total sum of Rs.55,137/- including the interest comprising of Rs.36,888/- as principal amount and interest @ 18% p.a. amounting to Rs.18,249/- from the date of delivery of goods i.e. 03.09.2015 on the principal amount of Rs.36,888/-. He prays to decree the suit directing to pay principal amount of Rs.36,888/- along with interest @ 18% p.a. from the 03.09.2015 till its full realization. -- 3 of 7 -- S.C. Suit 1813 of 18 .. j/4 .. 9. Perused Tax Invoice Exh.5. It is addressed to the defendant. Total amount of Tax Invoice is mentioned Rs.36,888/-. The Tax Invoice dated 03.09.2015. Perused Transport receipt Exh.6. Perused Ledger Account Exh.7. It shows Rs.36,888/- is outstanding amount. 10. Perused Notice dated 02.11.2017. It is addressed by the defendant, by the said Notice plaintiff claimed said amount of Rs.36,888/- along with professional fees of Rs.10,000/-. In this way by the said notice plaintiff claimed total amount of Rs.46,888/- from the defendant. By the said notice defendant is called upon to make payment of Rs.46,888/- to the plaintiff. 11. According to the plaintiff, he dispatched finished goods on 03.09.2015 amounting to Rs.36,888/-. The suit is filed on 14.06.2018. In this way suit is filed within three years from the sell of the said goods. Hence, suit is filed within law of limitation. 12. There is nothing on record to disbelieve the contention of the plaintiff that he sold goods to the defendant and defendant brought the said goods in Mumbai and he dispatched the said goods from Mumbai to the defendant. 13. The plaintiff has claimed interest @ 18% p.a. on the said principal amount of the goods. There is no documents on record to show that there was agreement between the parties and defendant agreed to pay the said amount with interest @ 18% p.a. -- 4 of 7 -- S.C. Suit 1813 of 18 .. j/5 .. 14. Perused Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It states where and in so far as a decree is for the payment of money, the Court may, in the decree, order interest at such rate as the Court deems reasonable to be paid on the principal sum adjudged, from the date of the suit to the date of the decree, in addition to any interest adjudged on such principal sum for any period prior to the institution of the suit, with further interest at such rate not exceeding six percent per annum, as the Court deems reasonable on such principal sum, from the date of the decree to the date of payment, or to such earlier date as the Court thinks fit; 15. Therefore, I am of the opinion that plaintiff is entitled to recover the said amount alongwith interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of sell i.e. from 03.09.2015 on the principal amount of Rs.36,888/- as prayed for. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order. ORDER The suit is decreed with costs as under : 1. The Defendant is hereby directed to pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs. 36,888/- (Thirty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Eight Only) alongwith with interest at the rate of 9 % per annum from the date of Sale i.e. 03/09/2015 till it's full realisation. 2. Decree be drawn-up accordingly. ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) Dt.: 03/03/2020 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 5 of 7 -- S.C. Suit 1813 of 18 .. j/6 .. Dictated on : 03/03/2020 Transcribed on : 12/03/2020 Checked on : 21/03/2020 Due to Covid-19 lockdown, the Court was not functioning and therefore Signed on: 12/06/2020 ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 6 of 7 -- S.C. Suit 1813 of 18 .. j/7 .. “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” Due to Covid-19 lockdown, the Court was not functioning and therefore upload on 13.06.2020 at 02.10 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (VARSHA U. PAWAR) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge HHJ SHRI S. G. BORLEPWAR (COURT ROOM NO.20) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 03.03.2020 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 12.06.2020 Judgment/order uploaded on 13.06.2020 -- 7 of 7 --
