Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Convent Girls High SchoolVsThe Designated Officer - III

CNR MHCC0100697820186-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 18th June 2018

TrustJury record updated 13 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101438/2018
Registration Date
18 Jun 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Convent Girls High School

    Respondent

    1. 1The Designated Officer - III

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 and 37

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-06-2018
Business: By precipe.
Advocate Mr. Chheda for plaintiff is present and filed draft NM.
Advocate Mr. Sutar for defendant/MMC is present with officer Shri Kirankumaar Annamwar (DO).
Heard both the sides on draft NM.
Admittedly plaintiff has filed the regularization proposal u/s 44 of the MRTP Act for retention of alleged notice structure. Hence, defendant is directed to consider the proposal as per law and pass order. Defendant-corporation is directed not to take any coercive action till the disposal of regularization proposal by the competent authority.
1. Suit and draft Notice of motion are disposed of accordingly.
2. Draft Notice of Motion be registered for statistical purpose.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 18-06-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 107695/2018
Filing Date: 13-06-2018
First Hearing Date: 18th June 2018
Decision Date: 18th June 2018
Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06  ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    18 Jun 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0101438/2018
Convent Girls High School Vs The Designated Officer - III
Date : 18-06-2018
Business : By precipe. Advocate Mr. Chheda for plaintiff is present and
filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Sutar for defendant/MMC is
present with officer Shri Kirankumaar Annamwar (DO).
Heard both the sides on draft NM. Admittedly plaintiff has
filed the regularization proposal u/s 44 of the MRTP Act for
retention of alleged notice structure. Hence, defendant is
directed to consider the proposal as per law and pass order.
Defendant-corporation is directed not to take any coercive
action till the disposal of regularization proposal by the
competent authority. 1. Suit and draft Notice of motion are
disposed of accordingly. 2. Draft Notice of Motion be
registered for statistical purpose.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 18-06-2018
COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    18 Jun 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0101438/2018
Convent Girls High School Vs The Designated Officer - III
Date : 18-06-2018
Business : By precipe. Advocate Mr. Chheda for plaintiff is present and
filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Sutar for defendant/MMC is
present with officer Shri Kirankumaar Annamwar (DO).
Heard both the sides on draft NM. Admittedly plaintiff has
filed the regularization proposal u/s 44 of the MRTP Act for
retention of alleged notice structure. Hence, defendant is
directed to consider the proposal as per law and pass order.
Defendant-corporation is directed not to take any coercive
action till the disposal of regularization proposal by the
competent authority. 1. Suit and draft Notice of motion are
disposed of accordingly. 2. Draft Notice of Motion be
registered for statistical purpose.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 18-06-2018
COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.