Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Sarwar Mohammad KhanVsNimmi Ali Raza Sayed And Anr

CNR MHCC0100696220199-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 09th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101245/2019
Registration Date
09 Jul 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Sarwar Mohammad Khan

    Respondent

    1. 1Nimmi Ali Raza Sayed And Anr

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 29-08-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2019

Date: 30-09-2019
Business: Adv. Mr. L.K.Tripathi for plaintiff present and submitted that defendant has not filed reply to Chamber Summons No.1245/19.
None present for Defendant.
It is made clear that if on next date defendant will not reply to said Chamber Summons court will be compiled to Chamber Summons without reply of defendant.
Case is adjourned to 23/10/2019 for Chamber Summons reply/hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2019

Date: 23-10-2019
Business: Advocate L. K. Tripathi for Plaintiff present and filed registered Chamber Summons no.1245/2019 with affidavit in support, t.o.r.
Advocate Jyoti Pandey for Defendant no.1 present and submitted that copy of Chamber Summons is received by Defendant no.1 and she will reply on next date.
Case is adjourned to 09/01/2020 for Chamber Summons reply.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2020

Date: 09-01-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. L. K. Tripathi for Plaintiff present
Advocate Mr. Abhyankar for Defendant no.1 present
Defendants have not filed reply to Chamber Summons no.1245/19.  Heard Plaintiff\''s advocate and Defendant no.1.  As Plaintiff is seeking inspection of argument for sale dated 21/11/2017 from Defendant no.1 and as Defendant no.1 has not filed reply to Chamber Summons in view of Order 11 Rule 15 of CPC the Chamber Summons can be allowed.  Further, Defendant no.2 also has not filed reply to the Chamber Summons, hence I proceed to pass following order-
                                   ORDER
1. Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
2. Defendants are directed to give inspection of documents as prayed by Plaintiff.
Case is adjourned to 12/02/2020 for NM for hearing.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 09-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 107458/2019
Filing Date: 09-07-2019
First Hearing Date: 29th August 2019
Decision Date: 09th January 2020
Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    09 Jan 2020
    Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: Advocate Mr. L. K. Tripathi for Plaintiff present Advocate Mr. Abhyankar for Defendant no.1
present Defendants have not filed reply to Chamber Summons no.1245/19. Heard
Plaintiff&amp#039s advocate and Defendant no.1. As Plaintiff is seeking inspection of
argument for sale dated 21/11/2017 from Defendant no.1 and as Defendant no.1 has not filed reply
to Chamber Summons in view of Order 11 Rule 15 of CPC the Chamber Summons can be allowed.
Further, Defendant no.2 also has not filed reply to the Chamber Summons, hence I proceed to pass
following order- ORDER 1. Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and
(b). 2. Defendants are directed to give inspection of documents as prayed by Plaintiff. Case is
adjourned to 12/02/2020 for NM for hearing.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.