Mr.Pradeep Raghunath GhogaleVsMCGM

Date: 15-06-2018
Business: By precipe
Adv Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present and filed draft NM alongwith affidavit t.o.r.
O- Leave is granted to register NM.
Adv Tondwalkar for the def/BMC present.
KB
LO at 5.10 pm
Adv for the def/BMC filed document alongwith affidavit t.o.r.
As a Court is busy in final argument of POCSO Case No. 1148/13 therefore matter kept on 20.06.2018.
Direction given to BMC till then not to take any coercive action against suit structure.
Adjourned to 20.06.2018  for ad interim hearing at 11.00 am.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2018

Date: 20-06-2018
Business: Adv Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff present.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adjourned to 21.06.2018  for ad interim hearing at 11.00 am.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2018

Date: 21-06-2018
Business: At 11.00 am
Adv for the plaintiff absent.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
LO at 11.10 am
Adv Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff present.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
Heard both the sides.
It is a contention of plaintiff that there structure is protected under the slum areas improvement, clearance and redevelopment by Maharashtra Government Gazette dtd 05.07.1984.
Directions given to BMC furnish the document that Bhandup village having survey no.79 and CTS no.203 and plaintiff structure is coming under the village Bhandup not at village Kanjur.
Plaintiff filed undertaking that if there property comes under the village Bhandup the BMC is at liberty to demolish the said structure or plaintiff themselves demolish the structure.
In view of the undertaking given by the plaintiff directions given to BMC till submission of above document not to take coercive action against the suit structure.
KB for filing undertaking.
L.O. at 4.45 pm
Adv. Tiwari for plaintiff present.
He filed undertaking by plaintiff. T.O.R. and marked at Exh.3
Directions given to plaintiff to serve copy of undertaking to S-ward office.
Authenticated copy of roznama be supplied to the parties to the suit.
Adjourned to 02.07.2018  for  ad-interim hearing at 11.00 a.m.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 02-07-2018

Date: 02-07-2018
Business: Plaintiff and adv absent.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
KB
LO at 2.45 pm
Since morning BMC officer is present when matter called out adv Nilesh Pandey absent.
LO at 3.05 pm
Adv Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff absent.
From the behaviour of the adv for plaintiff it is observed that only to pull on the matter whenever the matter called out he is not present in the Court by giving the reason he is busy in the another Court.
KB
LO at 3.30 pm
Adv Tiwari h/f Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
Ms. Yogita Patil, Jr. Engineer,  S-Ward, BMC present.
KB
LO at 5.00 pm
Adv Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adjourned to 04.07.2018  for directions.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2018

Date: 04-07-2018
Business: Adv. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv. Tondwalkar for deft/BMC present.
Jr. Engg. Yogita Patil present.
Heard both the sides.
      Issue notice to Asst. Commissioner \''S\'' ward to clarify whether they are authorized to demolish or to give notice to the structure, which is notified Slum Private owned property by the Maharashtra Govt.
    Adv. Tondwalkar for BMC repeatedly requested to the Court that she will convey the message to Asst. commissioner \''S\'' Ward that there is no need to issue notice.
   There are so many issues to clarify from the Asst. Commissioner therefore, Notice is issued to him.
       Earlier order to continue till next date.
    Adjourned to 09.07.2018 for Order.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2018

Date: 09-07-2018
Business: Plaintiff and adv absent.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
Assistant Commissioner of S-ward, Mr. Santoshkumar Dhonde present.
Directions given to Deputy Collector (Removal and Encroachment, Bhandup) to remain present before the Court to clarify who is the competent authority for removing illegal and unauthorised construction of notified slum private own property by the Maharashtra Government and also bring necessary GR and notification of Maharashtra Government before the Court on next date regarding the same.
LO
Adv Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adjourned to 25.07.2018  for order.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2018

Date: 25-07-2018
Business: Adv Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
KB
LO at 2.45 pm
Adv Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
It is the contention of plaintiff that the suit structure is protected slum notified by Maharashtra Govt. therefore as per the notification of Maharashtra Govt. the Deputy Collector is the proper authority and not the BMC for taking any action therefore by issuing notice on last date Deputy Collector (Removal and Encroachment, Bhandup) called today to clarify the position who is the proper authority to take the action against illegal construction if the slum is protected by Govt. notification. Notice sent to Deputy Collector through R.P.A.D. Nobody present from the office of Deputy Collector, Removal and Encroachment department.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
By consent matter adjourned to 08.08.2018  for arguments.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2018

Date: 08-08-2018
Business: Court is vacant. Hence today board is discharged.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2018

Date: 27-08-2018
Business: Court is vacant. Hence today board is discharged.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2018

Date: 24-09-2018
Business: Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondvalkar for BMC/Deft. present.
Summons/notice sent to Dy. Collector as per last roznama is returned back with post endorsement dated 30/08/2018 showing that due to incomplete address, notice could not be served, hence parties are directed to give correct address of Dy.
Collector.  Plaintiff\''s advocate submitted that, he will give correct address of Dy. Collector on today itself.  Hence re-issue notice on correct address. Copy of Roznama dated 21/06/2018 be annexed to the notice which will be sent to Dy. Collector.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 22/10/2018 for appearance of Dy. Collector.
Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2018

Date: 22-10-2018
Business: Advocate Mr. Priyank Shukla for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present.
Mr. Ashish Surve, Recovery Clerk of Revenue Department submitted that, concerned Dy. Collector, Removal and Encroachment, Bhandup, Mumbai-78 is unable to attend the Court as head clerk of the officer of Dy. Collector has suffered from Miscarriage.  It seems that by giving such reason Dy. Collector is avoiding to appear before the court, hence issue BW of Rs.5000/- against Dy. Collector Mr. Ajit Nairale.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 14/11/2018 for report of BW.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2018

Date: 14-11-2018
Business: Advocate Mr. Priyank Shukla h/f Adv. Tiwari for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Mr. Punekar for applicant present and filed Vakalatnama, t.o.r.  He also filed draft chamber summons along with affidavit in support. Leave granted.
Advocate Mr. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present.
Mr. Anand Namdev Komb, Naib Tahsildar, Bhandup present and submitted that, Dy. Collector Mr. Ajit Nairale against whom BW is issued is unable to attend the court.  Re-issue BW against witness.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 19/12/2018 for Report of BW/reply/registered Chamber Summons.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2018

Date: 19-12-2018
Business: Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present and filed reply-cum Written statement.
Dy. Collector Mr. Ajit Nairale present in respect of summons issued and submitted that, as per letter filed with list Exh.4 in suit no.1411/18, BMC can take the action under BMC Act against the private property which is declared as slum.  As Dy. Collector made it clear that BMC has jurisdiction to take action against private property which is declared as slum, confusion of the parties about the authority of BMC now has come to an end, hence Dy. Collector Mr. Nairale is discharged.
Learned advocate for Plaintiff Mr. Nilesh Pandey submitted that, Written Statement filed by Defendant/BMC can not be accepted after 30 days of appearance of Defendant before this Court. Advocate for BMC submitted that, summons is not served upon BMC but BMC sou-motto has appeared in the matter on the basis of notice served in respect of draft NM.  As BMC has sou-motto appeared and as affidavit of service of writ of summons is not filed by Plaintiff on record, I find that Written Statement filed by BMC can be accepted hence Written Statement-cum-reply filed by advocate for BMC is taken on record and marked as Exh.4.
Copy of Written Statement served upon advocate for Plaintiff.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 16/01/2019 for hearing of Notice of Motion and Chamber Summons reply/hearing.
L.O.
WPN 03944 attached to Mulund Police Station present and submitted BW report, t.o.r.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2019

Date: 16-01-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Mr. Thakare h/f Adv. Punekar for applicant present and filed original Chamber Summons no.2134/18 with affidavit in support, t.o.r.
Adv. Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present.
Heard.
F.R.S.R. following order has passed -
                               ORDER
Chamber Summons No.2134/2018 stands disposed off/dismissed.
Learned advocate for Plaintiff submitted that, he has taken out some case laws to be submitted in this matter however he is intending to get the documents which are referred in the various circulars of BMC, Secretariat, Slum authority office, etc.  He fairly submitted that, he will not require more than 2 weeks time to collect those references, hence requested to adjourn the matter.  Advocates for BMC, Ms. Tondwalkar and Mr. Walavalkar strongly opposed for adjmt of the matter on the ground that this matter is being adjourned from time to time on same ground and therefore, ad-interim relief granted is being continued without hearing NM on merits.  Hence BMC has strong objection to adjourn the matter .  Considering submissions made at bar for giving fair opportunity to Plaintiff, adjmt granted for two weeks as a last chance.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 04/02/2019 for hearing of Notice of Motion.
Plaintiff is directed to get register NM meanwhile.  Time extended to register NM
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2019

Date: 04-02-2019
Business: Plaintiff present. Advocate Mr. Priyank Shukla for Plaintiff present
Advocate for BMC/Deft present.
K.B.
L.O.
Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present and submitted that, NM hearing may be conducted in morning sessions. Granted.  It is made clear that NM hearing is conducted in morning sessions.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 13/02/2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-02-2019

Date: 13-02-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present
K.B.
L.O. at 4.30 p.m.  Same appearance.
Advocate for Plaintiff filed draft Notice of Motion along with affidavit in support. Leave granted.  Defendant\''s advocate raised objection to continue earlier order.
Plaintiff is directed to serve copy of draft NM upon Defendants.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 25/02/2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2019

Date: 25-02-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Tiwari h/f Adv. Pandey for Plaintiff present and filed registered NM no.749/19 with affidavit in support, t.o.r.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present.
K.B.
L.O. at 5.20 p.m. Advocate Mr. Tiwari sought adjournment as counsel Mr. Nilesh Pandey is not present today.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC raised objection for continuing earlier order and adjournment. As it is 5.20 p.m., adjournment granted as a last chance.
Case is adjourned to 13/03/2019 for NM hearing.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-03-2019

Date: 13-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present and submitted that, BMC has not filed reply to NM No.750/19 and after filing of reply to said NM, advocate for Plaintiff will argue draft NM for interim relief sought in the plaint.  Plaintiff is directed to get registered the draft NM immediately.  Time extended to register the same.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present and submitted that, NM No.750/19 has no concern with prayers made in draft NM, hence interim protection granted to Plaintiff is necessary to be vacated.  It is further submitted that, on next date BMC will file reply to NM No.750/19, however on that day Plaintiff should proceed with hearing of draft NM.  Considering submissions adjourned.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 29/03/2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 29-03-2019

Date: 29-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Priyank Shukla for Plaintiff present and filed 1355/19 with affidavit in support, t.o.r.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC/Deft present and filed reply to NM No.750/19, t.o.r. Copy served to advocate for Plaintiff.
Advocate for BMC raised objection to continue earlier order.
Court is busy in dictating judgment in suit no.2117/07, hence case is adjourned to 10/04/2019 for NM hearing.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2019

Date: 10-04-2019
Business: Adv. Bipin Tiwari for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondawalkar for BMC/Deft present.
KB
LO 3.53 pm
Adv. Bipin Tiwari for Plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Tondawalkar for BMC/Deft present.
On request of advocate Tiwari matter is kept back on second occasion.
LO at 5.15pm,
Advocate Mr. Nilesh Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Case is adjourned to 20.04.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2019

Date: 20-04-2019
Business: Advocate Tiwari for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms.Tondawlakar for defendant/MCGM present.
Adv. Tiwari filed affidavit of service in contempt motion. TOR.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 07.06.2019  for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-06-2019

Date: 07-06-2019
Business: Advocate Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms.Chavan for defendant/MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 12.06.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2019

Date: 12-06-2019
Business: Advocate Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms.Chavan for defendant/MCGM present. Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 17.06.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019

Date: 17-06-2019
Business: Advocate Tiwari h/f adv. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Advocate Mr. Giri  for defendant /MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 03.07.2019 at 2.45pm for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2019

Date: 03-07-2019
Business: Advocate Nilesh Pandey a/w adv. Bipin Tiwari for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Chavan for defendant /MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 06.07.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2019

Date: 06-07-2019
Business: Advocate Nilesh Pandey a/w adv. Bipin Tiwari for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Mhatre h/f adv. Chavan for defendant /MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 10.07.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2019

Date: 10-07-2019
Business: Advocate Nilesh Pandey a/w adv. Bipin Tiwari for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Chavan for defendant /MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 26.07.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2019

Date: 26-07-2019
Business: Court is on leave. Hence today board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-08-2019

Date: 22-08-2019
Business: Advocate Priyank Shukla h/f adv. Tiwari for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Mhatre h/f adv. Ms. Chavan for defendant/MCGM present and seeks time as adv. Ms. Chavan is not available due to death of her father.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 16.10.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2019

Date: 16-10-2019
Business: Advocate Bhosle h/f adv. Bipin Tiwari for plaintiff present and submitted that advocate on record has lost his mother and so he is unable to attend. He sought time. Considering reason time is granted.
Advocate Ms. Chavan for defendant/MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
The case is adjourned to 25.11.2019 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2019

Date: 25-11-2019
Business: Adv. Mr. Bhosale for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ms. Chavhan for deft/MCGM present.
KB.
LO
Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pande h/f adv. Mr. Bipin Tiwari for plff, prayed for adjd that adv. Mr.Tiwari is out of station for family function.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing on 16.12.2019.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2019

Date: 16-12-2019
Business: Adv. Bipin Tiwari for plaintiff, submits that Adv. Nilesh Pandey may argue the matter and he is retiring from present case. At his request 16.01.2020 next date is granted for argument, it is made clear, in default to argue on 16.01.2020,  EOC will stands vacated, without specific order.
Adv. Chavan for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 16.01.2020.
Later On.
Adv. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff present.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2020

Date: 16-01-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for plaintiff, prayed for adjd as he is continuing with present brief and not going to retire. It is requested for adjd r/o 06.03.2020.
Adv. Mrs. Mhatre h/f adv. Mrs. Chavhan for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing on 06.03.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2020

Date: 06-03-2020
Business: (In charge Court to C.R. no.11)
Adv. Mr. Tiwari for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. for on NM hearing on 15.04.2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2020

Date: 15-04-2020
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-04-2020

Date: 22-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-05-2020

Date: 13-05-2020
Business: National Lockdown
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2020

Date: 02-06-2020
Business: National Lockdown
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-06-2020

Date: 19-06-2020
Business: Adjd. to
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2020

Date: 06-08-2020
Business: Adjd. to
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2020

Date: 23-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2020

Date: 09-12-2020
Business: Adv. Bhosale for plaintiff , prayed for adjournment r/o dtd. 05-01-2021.
Adv. Mhatre h/f Adv. Tondwalkar  for deft./MCGM present.
In default to argue on next date, Court may vacate EOC.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd.to 05-01-2021 for NM Hearing.
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-01-2021

Date: 05-01-2021
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla h/f Mr. Tiwari for plaintiff present and submitted that the father of advocate Mr. Bipin Tiwari is expired and requested for short adjournment.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 28.01.21.
                                                                               Judge
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2021

Date: 28-01-2021
Business: Adv. Priyank Shukla for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjourned for NM hrg. on 16.03.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2021

Date: 16-03-2021
Business: Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dubey for plaintiff present and requested for short adjournment.
Adv. Ms. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjourned for NM hearing to 30.03.21.
                                                                               Judge
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-03-2021

Date: 30-03-2021
Business: Adv. Priyank Shukla for plaintiff present.
Adv. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjourned to 22.06.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2021

Date: 22-06-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2021

Date: 17-08-2021
Business: CORAM  H.H.J. SHRI. D. D. ALMALE, (C.R.NO.06)
(Matter pertains to C.R. No.11)
Adv. Priyank Shukla for plaintiff.
Adv. Adv Mhatre for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. For NM hearing to 09.09.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2021

Date: 09-09-2021
Business: CORAM-H.H.J. SHRI.S.D. KULKARNI, (C.R.NO.08)
(Matter pertains to C.R. No.11)
Adv. Priyank Shukhla for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mahatre for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. For N/m hearing  to 26.10.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2021

Date: 26-10-2021
Business: (Matter pertains to C.R. No.11)
Adv. Bipin Tiwari for plaintiff present.
Adv.Mr.Khandagle for deft./MCGM present.
Earlier order if any, to continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. For  N/M Hrg. to 30.11.2021
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-11-2021

Date: 30-11-2021
Business: Adv. Mr. Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Ms. Mhatre for Defendant/BMC present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
On oral request of advocate for the Plaintiff matter adj. to 13/01/2022 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2022

Date: 13-01-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Ms Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
In view of office order no. 07/2022 dated 07.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dated 06.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases (all variants) and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned without passing any adverse order against the party/s.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 24.02.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2022

Date: 24-02-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Pathak h/f Adv. Priyank Shukla for plaintiff is present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of plaintiff. He informed that the earlier advocate for the plaintiff is no more. TOR. It is marked at Exh. 05. O- Filed. He orally requested for time for NM hearing. Granted.
Adv. Ms. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 05.04.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2022

Date: 05-04-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for plaintiff is present. He requested short time to serve copy of contempt NM to the concerned office and to verify documents, as he recently appeared in the matter. Granted.
Adv. Ms. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing/service of contempt NM to 19.07.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2022

Date: 19-07-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present and filed list of documents. TOR. It is marked at Exh.06. O- Filed.  Copy is supplied to the other side.
Adv. Mrs. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
The record shows that the main NM is pending for hearing since long. Therefore, the parties are called upon to file their writtens submissions on this NM positively on the next date.
The plaintiff is also preferred contempt NM in the suit. He is called upon to argue on maintainability of contempt NM along-with suit.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM/ maintainability of contempt NM to 15.09.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-09-2022

Date: 15-09-2022
Business: Adv. Nilesh Pandey for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. J.S. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
KB LO at 04:00 pm.
Advocate for the plaintiff is heard on maintainability of the contempt NM and it is closed for order on its tenabiliy. He also requested for time to file written submissions on main NM. Time is granted strictly as a last chance.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for Order as regards maintainability of the contempt NM/ Written submissions on main NM/to 01.10.2022.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2022

Date: 01-10-2022
Business: Plaintiff is present in person and orally requested for time to file written submissions on NM, as he wanted to engage new advocate. Time is granted strictly as a last chance.
Adv. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for Order on maintainability of contempt NM/written submissions on NM to 21.10.2022.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2022

Date: 21-10-2022
Business: Adv. Ashotosh Shukla a/w Adv. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present and tendered draft Ch/s along-with affidavit. O-Leave is granted to register till the next date. The plaintiff is called upon to ensure its service on the other side.
Adv. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for Order of tenability of contempt NM/Ch/s reply/ written submissions on NM to 14.11.2022.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2022

Date: 14-11-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Rajnish Upadhyay for the plaintiff is present and filed original registered Ch/s No. 1767/2022 along-with affidavit. TOR. Copy is supplied to the other side. He orally requested for time to file written submissions on NM. Granted as a last chance.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present.
The Court is busy in recording evidence in SU Nos. 2753/14, 735/15 and 1509/16 and hearing on urgent matters.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for NM Order on tenability of contempt NM/Ch/s reply/written submissions on NM to 03.12.2022.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2022

Date: 03-12-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashotosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present and requested for time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale h/f Adv. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present and sought time to file Ch/s reply. Granted as a last chance.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for Order on maintainability of Contempt NM /written submissions on NM/Ch/s reply to 20.12.2022.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2022

Date: 20-12-2022
Business: None present for the plaintiff to file written submissions on NM. Hence, it is posted for dismissal Orders.
Adv. Mrs. J.V. Mhatre for the defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
Adjourned for Orders on maintainability of contempt NM/  NM dismissal/Ch/s. reply to 12.01.2023.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 12-01-2023

Date: 12-01-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mrs. J.V. Mhatre for defendant/MCGM is present.
Order below exhibit No. 01:
01.    Perused Contempt NM No. 750/2019. Heard the learned advocate for plaintiff on the maintainability of this NM along-with the suit.

02.    Having considered his submissions, at the outset, it is notable that by filing this NM, the plaintiff contended that the concerned Officer i.e. the respondents in this NM, intentionally made false statement and tried to mislead this Court on the point of \''authority\'' of the defendant/MCGM to proceed against the suit property, as it is situated at private plot of land and is declared as \''Slum\'' area. Consequently, the plaintiff prayed for an inquiry U/sec. 340 of the Cr.P.C. and lodging of offences U/sec. 166, 167, 191, 192, 196, 199 and 200 of the IPC.
03.    Taking into account the overall tenor of this NM, here it would not be out of place to mention that at no point of time, the learned predecessor of this Court ever opined as regards the alleged efforts on behalf of the said Officers to have made false statement before the Court or tried to mislead it. As such, he did not think it fit to initiate the inquiry as contemplated U/sec. 340 of the Cr.P.C.. On the contrary, in view of the roznama dtd. 19.12.2018, it seems that on that day, the then Dy. Collector Mr. Ajit Nairale was present before this Court and submitted that the defendant has jurisdiction to take the action against private property, which is declared as \''Slum\''. On his statement, the learned predecessor of this Court expressed in the roznama that the confusion of parties about the authority of the defendant came to an end and Mr. Nairare was discharged.
04.    Now coming to the legal aspects, by this Contempt NM the plaintiff asked for an inquiry U/sec. 340 of the Cr.P.C., on the grounds which were never expressed by the then Presiding Officer of this Court and as of now, there is no material to consider the same. Simultaneously, the Offences defind U/sec. 166 and 167 of the IPC are independent offences and the Offences U/sec. 196, 199 and 200 of the IPC pre-require \''complaint\'' of the concerned Court for taking of \''cognizance\'' in view of section 195 of the Cr.P.C., which is missing from the present set of facts.
05.    The record further goes to show that the main NM is pending since 2019. Time and again, the plaintiff was directed to proceed with the said NM, wherein he failed and as such, it is pending for dismissal order. Still, the fact remains that till today, the interim Order is continued in favour of the plaintiff. In this manner, the very progress of this matter is being hampered due to filing of this Contempt NM in the suit and absence of the plaintiff. In the result, the Contempt NM No. 750/2019 stands disposed of as \''not maintainable\'' along-with the suit, leaving the plaintiff at liberty to take appropriate steps, if he still wants to raise such aspects of the matter, in proper form of the proceeding as per law.
The advocate for plaintiff requested for keeping back the matter.
KB LO at 03:28 pm.
Adv. Mr. M.R. Yadav for the plaintiff is present and filed the application for change of caption and keeping the matter for Ch/s hearing. TOR. It is marked at Exh. 10. O- Sufficient time is already granted. Time and again, the plaintiff has been directed to proceed with the matter and as he is failed, he was called upon to file his written submissions, but in vain. Today, the NM is pending for dismissal. Still, considering this application, the caption is changed and he is called upon to file written submissions on the NM, subject to costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rs. Five Thousand) to be deposited in favour of the DLSA, Mumbai, till the next date. In default, the NM would stand dismissed.
KB LO at 04:00 pm.
Advocate for the defendant orally requested for time to file Ch/s reply. Time is granted till the next date.
Advocate for the plaintiff orally requested for reduction of costs. In view of his submissions, the costs is reduced at Rs. 1,500/- (Rs. One Thousand Five Hundred).
Adjourned for costs/compliance/Ch/s reply/written submission on NM to 28.02.2023.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2023

Date: 13-01-2023
Business: By Praecipe matter is taken on today\''s board.
Adv. Mr. Ashotosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present and requested for extension of interim Order on the ground that somehow, it was not extended yesterday. It was in force prior thereto. He submitted that considering the ensuing holidays, any unpleasant action may be taken by the defendant/MCGM. He also undertook to inform this extension of interim Order to the Office of defendant. Perused the record. It appears that the interim Order was continued from time to time, except yesterday. Hence, the interim Order is extended till the next date. The learned advocate for the plaintiff is called upon to inform passing of this Order to the concerned Office of the defendant.
None present for defendant/MCGM.
Authenticated copy of this roznama be given to both the parties.
The matter is already adjourned for costs/compliance/Ch/s hearing/written submissions on NM to 28.02.2023.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2023

Date: 28-02-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla present for plaintiff.
Adv. Mrs. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adjourned for Compliance to 13.04.2023.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 13-04-2023

Date: 13-04-2023
Business: Matter pertains to C. R. No. 11
Adv. Mr. Ashotosh Shukla present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Mrs. S.S. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adjourned for compliance to 17.06.2023.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2023

Date: 17-06-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present and informed that the Order of costs is complied with. He also filed written submissions on NM No. 1355/19. TOR. Copy is supplied to the other side.
Adv. Ms. S. S. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present and sought permission to argue NM orally. Granted.
Heard both the sides on Ch/s. 1767/22.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for Ch/s. Order/NM hearing by defendant to 04.07.2023.
Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2023

Date: 04-07-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Ms. S.S. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present.
LO 4.30 p.m.
Adv. Mr. M. R. Yadav h/f Adv. Mr. Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
F.R.S.R. Following Order is passed in Ch/s. No. 1767/2022.
			-: O R D E R :-
(i).    Chamber Summons No.1767/2022 is made absolute in
         terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) only. Consequently, the
         plaintiff is called upon to carry out the proposed amendment
         in the plaint, within two weeks from passing of this Order,
         and to file copy of amended plaint on the next date.
(ii).  Chamber Summons No.1767/2022, accordingly, stands
      disposed of.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for compliance/NM hearing by defendant to 10.08.2023.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2023

Date: 10-08-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present and informed that amendment is carried. He also filed copy of amended plaint. TOR. It is marked as Exhibit 1A.O- Filed. Copy is supplied to the other side.
Adv. Khandagale h/f Adv. S.S. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing by defendant to 05.10.2023.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2023

Date: 05-10-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale h/f Adv. Mrs. Chavan for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to argue the NM. Time is granted.  Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing by defendant to 28.11.2023.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2023

Date: 28-11-2023
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to argue the NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing by defendant to 25.01.2024.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2024

Date: 25-01-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla h/f Adv. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM By defendant to 04.04.2024.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 04-04-2024

Date: 04-04-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM by defendant to 25.06.2024.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2024

Date: 25-06-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav a/w Adv. Ms. Nagarthawar for defendant/ MCGM is present and sought time to argue on NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing by defendant to 02.08.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2024

Date: 02-08-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar for defendant/MCGM is present and sought time to argue the NM. Time is granted.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 01.10.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2024

Date: 01-10-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla a/w Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar a/w Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present and sought time to argue NM. Granted. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 14.11.2024.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2024

Date: 14-11-2024
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. S.R. Charatkar a/w Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file written submissions on NM. Time is granted. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 07.01.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2025

Date: 07-01-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present and sought time to file written submissions on NM. Granted. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for written submissions on NM/NM hearing to 20.02.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2025

Date: 20-02-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari a/w Adv. Mr. S. R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present and submitted that NM reply be treated as written submissions on NM. Advocate for the plaintiff submitted that he will make argument only point on legal point. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM hearing by plaintiff to 15.03.2025.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2025

Date: 15-03-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present and filed application for production of documents. Taken on record. It is marked as Exhibit 11. O- Production allowed. Copy is supplied to the other side. He also tendered draft Ch/s. along-with affidavit. O- Leave is granted to register within 7 working days from today. In default, the draft Ch/s. would stand dismissed. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present and submitted that reply be treated as written submissions on NM. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjourned for NM Order/tendering registered Ch/s./Ch/s. reply to 22.04.2025.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 22-04-2025

Date: 22-04-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present and tendered registered Ch/s. No.731 along-with affidavits. Adv. Mrs. Metakari a/w Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present and endorsed say on Ch/s.. F.R.S.R. Following Order is passed in NM No. 1355/2019.ORDER (i).	 Notice of Motion No.1355/2019  is dismissed. (ii).  Notice of Motion No. 1355/2019  is, accordingly, disposed of. The appearance is as above. Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla a/w Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla filed application for continuation of EOC. Taken on record. It is marked as Exhibit 12. O- Other side to say. Say filed. Heard. Order below Exhibit  12- It is stated that plaintiff intends to challenge Order dismissing NM for temporary injunction and some time is required to prefer appeal and requested for continuation of EOC. Advocate for defendant opposed application. Heard both the sides. As per Order dtd. 15.06.2018 Court has granted ad-interim protection and same was continue during the pendency of NM. Plaintiff intends to challenge Order dismissing NM. Hence, considering the fact Earlier order, if any, to continue  for 4 weeks from date of uploading of Order on CIS. Adjourned for Ch/s. hearing to 21.06.2025.
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2025

Date: 21-06-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. M.R. Yadav for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari a/w Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present.
Heard both the sides on Ch/s..
F.R.S.R. Following Order is passed in Ch/s. No. 731/2025.
-: O R D E R :-
(i)	Chamber Summons no.731 of 2025 is made absolute as 	per the schedule annexed alongwith the CS.
(ii)	Plaintiff to carry out amendment as per the schedule within 	stipulated time.
	(iii)	Chamber Summons is, accordingly,  disposed of.
Adjourned for compliance to 22.07.2025.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2025

Date: 08-07-2025
Business: Not on board. Taken on board.
Writ received from Hon'ble High Court APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 282 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8205 OF 2025 (Coram: GAURI GODSE, J.) on 7th MAY 2025 the following order is passed:
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the structure
being in a notified slum area is protected under the government
policy and he submits that the documents produced on record
support the plaintiff’s contention that the structure is in existence
since prior to the datum line.
4. Learned counsel for the corporation seeks time to take
instructions.
5. List the appeal on 25th June 2025.
6. Till the next date the ad-interim protection granted by the City
Civil Court shall continue.
Adjourned for compliance to 22.07.2025.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2025

Date: 22-07-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present and submitted that compliance is carryout and sought time to file copy of amended plaint on record. Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/BMC is present. By consent of the parties, the matter is referred to ensuing Lok-Adalat and issuance of separate notices is dispensed with.
Adjourned for lok-adalat/compliance to 13.09.2025.
Next Purpose: Lok-Nyayalay
Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2025

Date: 13-09-2025
Business: Plaintiff absent and advocate present.
Defendant absent and his advocate present.
Matter is not settled between the parties. Hence, no settlement.
Matter is adjourned to 15.11.2025.
Next Purpose: Lok-Nyayalay
Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2025

Date: 25-09-2025
Business: Not on board. Taken on board.
Writ received from Hon'ble High Court APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 282 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8205 OF 2025 (Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J.) on 25th June, 2025 the following order is passed:
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of
paucity of time. Stand Over to 30/09/2025. If any ad-interim /
interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to
operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted
not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected.
Adjourned for lok-adalat to 15.11.2025.
Next Purpose: Lok-Nyayalay
Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2025

Date: 15-11-2025
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari for defendant/BMC is present. By consent of the parties, the matter is referred to ensuing Lok-Adalat and issuance of separate notices is dispensed with.
Adjourned for lok-adalat to 13.12.2026.
Next Purpose: Lok-Nyayalay
Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2025

Date: 13-12-2025
Business: PANEL HEAD - HHJ  Shri. A. K. KALE
Panel Member - Prof. Dipak Kumar Chattopadhyay
Matter pertains to CR No. 11
Adv. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. S.R. Yadav for the defendant/MCGM is present.
Mr. Rohan Sherawate Officer is present.
Matter is not settled. Hence,  sent to regular Court.
Matter Adjourned to 30.01.2026
Next Purpose: Lok-Nyayalay
Next Hearing Date: 30-01-2026

Date: 30-01-2026
Business: Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present. By consent of the parties, the matter is referred to ensuing Lok-Adalat and issuance of separate notices is dispensed with.
Adjourned for lok-adalat to 14.03.2026.
Next Purpose: Lok-Nyayalay
Next Hearing Date: 14-03-2026

Date: 14-03-2026
Business: Matter pertains to Court Room No. 11
Plaintiff in person present.
Advocate Priyansh Shukla for Plaintiff.
Adv. S. R. Yadav for Defendant/BMC present.
Matter not settled.
Matter adjd. to  25-04-2026 for Directions.
Adv. Gargi R. Bhatkar                HHJ. Shri. Anil D. Salunkhe
     Panel Member                                             Panel Head
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2026

Date: 25-04-2026
Business: Adv. Mr. Priyank Shukla for the plaintiff is present.
Adv. Mr. Botlawar h/f Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari for defendant/BMC is present.
Perused the record, it reveals to me that, on last lok-adalat matter not settled due to absence of officer of defendant. So looking the facts available on record today matter adjourned for filing WS.
Adjourned for WS to 25.06.2026.
Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2026

Date: 25-06-2026
Business: Court is vacant.
Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2026

CHAMBER SUMMONS/100731/2025
CHAMBER SUMMONS/102134/2018
NOTICE OF MOTION/101355/2019
NOTICE OF MOTION/100750/2019
CHAMBER SUMMONS/101767/2022

Filing Number: 107556/2018
Filing Date: 08-06-2018
First Hearing Date: 15th June 2018
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE