Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 03 May 2019 · CNR MHCC010068692018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.1029/2018 Received on : 07.06.2018 Registered on : 12.09.2018 Decided on : 03.05.2019 Duration : Y M D 00 10 27 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1029 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010068692018 Jeevandeep Edumedia Pvt. Ltd having Reg. Office at Sun Paradise Business Plaza, First Floor, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai 400 013. Through its Legal Assistant Manager Mrs. Tirumala Reddy Age : 31, Occup : Service ...Plaintiff Versus Mr. Pravin Kode Age : not known Founder, Lotus English School, Ambajogai Road, Near Varad Hospital, Kingaon – 413523 Tal: Ahmedpur, Dist : Latur, Maharashtra ...Defendant Appearances: Advocate Ms. Ritika Iyer for the Plaintiff. Defendant Exparte. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 3rd MAY, 2019. -- 1 of 6 -- :2: Summary Suit No.1029/2018 [ J U D G M E N T ] Story of plaintiff in short is as under : 1. Plaintiff has stated that pursuant to defendant verbal and purchase order from time to time, it sold supplied and delivered to defendant said goods through Delivery challans from time to time which were acknowledged by defendant without any protest for quality, quantity till date. Plaintiff has further stated that in due course of business it raised Invoices upon defendant vide Invoice bearing No.PT65056 dated 13.06.2016 for the sum of Rs.123,870.00, Invoice bearing No.II60122 dated 10.06.2016 for the sum of Rs.188.00, in aggregate to sum of Rs.124,058.00. Plaintiff has further stated that after lot of persuasion and followup defendant have failed to make payment till date. Plaintiff has further stated that as per its Sales ledger now a sum of Rs.1,24,058.00 is due and payable by defendant to it. 2. Plaintiff has further stated that it through their Advocate sent legal Notices dated 28.05.2018 which was posted on 28.05.2018 by Regd. A.D. which was received by defendant on 30.05.2018 as per postal Track Report calling upon defendant to make payment of balance sum of Rs.1,24,058.00. Therefore, plaintiff filed this suit. 3. Defendant failed to appear in the suit, therefore, suit has proceeded exparte against defendant. 4. Heard the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. 5. Following points arise for determination and their findings followed by reasons are as stated below: -- 2 of 6 -- :3: Summary Suit No.1029/2018 Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to get amount of Rs.1,67,986/ from defendant along with interest @ 18% p. a. on the sum of Rs.1,24,058/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation ? ...Partly in the affirmative. 2. What order and Decree ? ...As per final order REASONS 6. Plaintiff relied upon the following documents as documentary evidence which are as under : Sr. No. Exhibits Particulars 1. Exh.8 Copy of Board Resolution dated 01st January 2018. 2. Exh.9 Copy of Board Resolution dated 14th July 2018. 3. Exh.10 Xerox copy of Purchase Order dated 06.06.2014 4. Exh.11 Original Lorry Receipt dated 10.06.2016 5. Exh.12 Original Lorry Receipt dated 11.06.2016 6. Exh.13 Office copy of Invoice dated 13.06.2016 7. Exh.14 Office copy of Invoice dated 10.06.2016 8. Exh.15 Office copy of Sales Ledger dated 01.04.2015 to 24.05.2018 9. Exh.16 Office copy of Notice dated 28.05.2018 10. Exh.17 Original postal receipt dated 28.05.2018 11. Exh.18 Original A.D. Card dated 30.05.2018 AS TO POINT NOS. 1 AND 2: 7. Plaintiff has adduced evidence of Ms. Rutuja Suraj Sarfare (P.W.1) in the form of affidavit below Exh.6 and she has stated in her evidence that pursuant to defendant verbal and purchase order bearing No.32227, 32228 dated 06.06.2016, plaintiff sold supplied and delivered to defendant said goods through PROFESSIONAL COURIES -- 3 of 6 -- :4: Summary Suit No.1029/2018 L.R. No.0210435251 dated 10.06.2016 and SHAH ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CONTRACTORS, L.R. No. 98505 dated 11.06.2016 respectively which were acknowledged by defendant without any protest for quality, quantity till date. 8. Ms. Rutuja Suraj Sarfare (P.W.1) has further stated that in due course of business plaintiff raised Invoices upon defendant Invoice bearing No.PT65056 dated 13.06.2016 for the sum of Rs.123,870.00, Invoice bearing No.II60122 dated 10.06.2016 for the sum of Rs.1,88.00, in aggregate sum of Rs.124,058.00. 9. Ms. Rutuja Suraj Sarfare (P.W.1) has further stated that as defendant failed to make payment of outstanding amount and therefore plaintiff through their Advocate sent legal Notices dated 28.05.2018 which was posted on 28.05.2018 by Regd A.D. which was received by defendant on 30.05.2018 as per A.D. Card calling upon defendant to make payment of balance sum of Rs.1,24,058.00. She has further stated that Notice sent is delivered to defendant on 30.05.2018 as per A.D. card as Notice was sent on true and correct address registered with plaintiff. She has further stated that now, a sum of Rs.1,67,986/ is due and payable by the defendant to the plaintiff inclusive of interest upto 31.05.2018 as per the particular of claim. 10. Plaintiff has produced all the corroborating documents which are Copy of Board of Resolutions, Xerox copy of Purchase Order, Original Lorry Receipts, Office copy of invoices, Office copy of Sales Ledger, Office copy of Notice, Original postal receipt and Original A.D. Card on record as documentary evidence. The oral evidence of plaintiff is corroborated by documentary evidence. Defendant has failed to -- 4 of 6 -- :5: Summary Suit No.1029/2018 challenge all the allegations in the plaint and evidence of plaintiff. Therefore, plaintiff has proved that it is entitled to get sum of Rs.1,67,986/ from defendant. 11. It appears that as per Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it will be proper to direct defendant to give interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.1,24,058/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. Hence, answer point No.1 partly in the affirmative and pass following Order: ORDER 1. Suit is partly decreed with cost. 2. Defendant is directed to pay sum of Rs.1,67,986/ to plaintiff along with interest @ 9% p.a. on the sum of Rs.1,24,058/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee be refunded as per rules. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 03.05.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 03.05.2019 Transcribed on : 03.05.2019 Signed on : 03.05.2019 -- 5 of 6 -- :6: Summary Suit No.1029/2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 23.05.2019 At 3:09 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 03.05.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 03.05.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 23.05.2019 -- 6 of 6 --
