Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 02 Dec 2024 · CNR MHCC010068322018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: ..1.. Summons for Judgment No.166/2018 MHCC010068322018 Presented on : 08/06/2018 Registered on : 08/06/2018 Decided on : 02/12/2024 Duration : 06Y 05M 25D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, GREATER MUMBAI AT MAZGAON SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.166 OF 2018 (CNR NO.MHCC01-006832-2018) IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.807 OF 2017 Sanjaykumar Juharmal Shah (Jain) ) an adult, residing at 22/24, 2nd floor, ) Singapore Building, Vithalwadi, ) Champa Gali X Lane, Mumbai – 400 002, ) through his constituted attorney ) Shri Dilipkumar Juharmal Shah. )...Plaintiff VERSUS Mrs. Sushilaben Sureshkumar Shah, ) an adult, residing at 408, 4th floor, Saraf ) Mansion, Building No.32, Princess Street, ) Princess Co-op Housing Society, ) Mumbai – 400 002. )...Defendant Appearance :- Learned Advocate Ramesh Jain for plaintiff. Learned Advocate Suresh Jain for defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH JAFAR COURT ROOM NO.84 DATE : 02/12/2024. -- 1 of 4 -- ..2.. Summons for Judgment No.166/2018 O R D E R 1 Plaintiff has filed this suit for recovery of amount, contending that in pursuant to the request of defendant, plaintiff has advanced a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- through cheque which is honoured and the amount is credited to the account of defendant on 02/04/2014. According to the plaintiff, defendant has agreed to pay the said amount with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. However, failed to repay as agreed. Therefore, plaintiff issued notice through advocate on 18/11/2016, which is received to the defendant on 25/11/2016. Defendant failed to reply the notice and to pay the amount as agreed, consequently, plaintiff has filed this Suit for recovery of amount. 2 In response to the writ of summons, defendant tendered his appearance, thereafter, plaintiff took out summons for judgment, which was served upon the defendant. Defendant resisted the contention by filing reply to the summons for judgment contending that the suit is not maintainable under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure. Defendant further took the plea that the suit is filed through power of attorney which is insufficiently stamped. He further contended that plaintiff is a money-lender without license and submitted that no decreed be passed against defendant. Defendant also denied that the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- is advanced to the defendant and ask the plaintiff to prove its contention with strict proof and lastly, prayed for dismissal of summons for judgment. -- 2 of 4 -- ..3.. Summons for Judgment No.166/2018 3 Heard rival parties at length. 4 Upon rival pleading, it reveals that the suit is based on honoured cheque. I am enlightened by the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Jyotsna K. Valia Vs. T. S. Parekh and Co. reported in 2007(3)BOMCR772, wherein it is held that the a summary suit does not lie on the basis of honoured cheque. In these circumstances, without going into the merit of the defence, I am of the view that defendant is entitled for unconditional leave to defend and suit is required to be tried as a regular Civil Suit. In the result, I proceed to pass following order :- ORDER 1. Summons for Judgment No.166 of 2018 in Summary Suit No.807 of 2017, is hereby rejected. 2. Defendant is granted unconditional leave to defend. 3. Defendant is directed to file written statement within stipulated period from the date of this order. 4. Summons for judgment is disposed of accordingly. (Order dictated and pronounced in open Court) (Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar) Judge, City Civil Court, Mazgaon Mumbai Date: 02/12/2024. Court Room No.84 Dictated on : 02/12/2024. Transcribed on : 02/12/2024. Signed by HHJ on : 03/12/2024. -- 3 of 4 -- ..4.. Summons for Judgment No.166/2018 “Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order”. 03/12/2024 at about 4.45 p.m. (Ms. Sonali S. Sawant) Stenographer (Grade-III) Name of the Hon'ble Judge : Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar, Judge, City Civil Court & Addl. Sessions Judge, Court Room No.84, Mazgaon, Mumbai Date of pronouncement of Order : 02/12/2024 Order signed by Hon'ble Judge on : 03/12/2024 Order uploaded on : 03/12/2024 at about 4.45 p.m. -- 4 of 4 --
