Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Pravinchandra Meghji Nisar +3 moreVsMunicipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai +2 more

CNR MHCC0100678120184-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 14th July 2026

TrustJury record updated 13 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100023/2026
Registration Date
05 Jan 2026

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    7

    Petitioner

    1. 1Pravinchandra Meghji Nisar
    2. 2Meghji Malshi Nisar
    3. 3Jayantilal Anandji Rita
    4. 4Shah Nenshi Kanji and Co. Through its Sole Proprietor Jayantilal Anandji Rita

    Respondent

    1. 1Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
    2. 2The Assistant Engineer, Building and Factories N Ward
    3. 3Raghuwanshi Ventures

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 09-01-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR(C.R. No. 04)
Exh. 1  Plaint
Exh. 2  Vakalatnama
Exh  3  Memorandum of Registered Address
Exh. 4  List of documents.
None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Ms. Vidya Vyavhare for defendant/MCGM is present.
Adjourned for Directions .to 06.04.2026
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2026

Date: 06-04-2026
Business: CORAM  H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
None for the plaintiff present.
None for defendant/MCGM present.
Adjourned for Directions to 14.07.2026.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 14-07-2026

Date: 14-07-2026
Business: CORAM   H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Ms. Rupali Patil for defendant/MCGM is present.
	Plaintiff and his advocate are absent when called repeatedly. It appears, plaintiff is absent since long and failed to take appropriate steps in order to proceed. As plaintiff is not attending the Court, it means, he is not keenly interested to proceed. It would not be appropriate to keep the suit pending unnecessary for years together. Thus, suit stands dismissed for want of prosecution and finally disposed off.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 14-07-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 107455/2018
Filing Date: 07-06-2018
First Hearing Date: 09th January 2026
Decision Date: 14th July 2026
Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    14 Jul 2026
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 7 Dt:14.07.2026
SU 23/26
CORAM H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Ms. Rupali Patil for defendant/MCGM is present.
Plaintiff and his advocate are absent when called
repeatedly. It appears, plaintiff is absent since long and failed to
take appropriate steps in order to proceed. As plaintiff is not
attending the Court, it means, he is not keenly interested to
proceed. It would not be appropriate to keep the suit pending
unnecessary for years together. Thus, suit stands dismissed for
want of prosecution and finally disposed off.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    14 Jul 2026
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 7 Dt:14.07.2026
SU 23/26
CORAM H.H.J. SHRI. C. S. DATIR (C.R. No. 04)
None present for the plaintiff.
Adv. Ms. Rupali Patil for defendant/MCGM is present.
Plaintiff and his advocate are absent when called
repeatedly. It appears, plaintiff is absent since long and failed to
take appropriate steps in order to proceed. As plaintiff is not
attending the Court, it means, he is not keenly interested to
proceed. It would not be appropriate to keep the suit pending
unnecessary for years together. Thus, suit stands dismissed for
want of prosecution and finally disposed off.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.