Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Mitesh Navinchandra ShahVsM/s. Victoria Iron and Metal Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.

CNR MHCC0100673120192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 04th December 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102450/2019
Registration Date
03 Jul 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Pooja Jain for Plaintiff present.
    Deft and Adv absent.
    Adj for reply as last chance to 21.09.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2019
    
    Date: 21-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present
    Adv. Viraj Bansode for defendant present.
    With concerned with both parties.
    Matter is adjd. NM reply to 5.10.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2019
    
    Date: 05-10-2019
    Business: Adv. Patil  for Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Saurav Uttangale for defendant present.
    Adjd. to 7.11.2019 for NM reply
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019
    
    Date: 07-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Saurabh Utangale for defendant present.
    Adjourned for NM Reply to 29.11.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2019
    
    Date: 29-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Saurav Utangale for defendant present.
    Adjourned for consent term to 3.12.2019
    Next Purpose: CONSENT TERM
    Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2019
    
    Date: 03-12-2019
    Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Saurav Uttangale I/b Adv. Tushar Goradia for defendant present.
    Plaintiff present.
    Mr. Rahul Ramesh Shah director of defendant present.
    Ex 3 Consent Term filed by both parties.
    Verified plaintiff and director of defendant Rahul Ramesh Shah.
    They voluntarily agree terms contained in Exh.3.  I perused Exh.3 para 2 to 4 of the same state about background history of litigation which cannot form part of Consent Decree, so I exclude those terms while passing order.
    Hence, pass following order
                              ORDER BELOW Exh.1
      1. Suit is decreed in terms para 1, 5 to 34 of Consent terms Exh.3.
    2. Court fee if any as per Rule be  refunded to the plaintiffs.
    3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
    4. In above terms suit stands disposed of.
          Plaintiff is directed to file register NM on record.
    Adjourned to 4.12.2019 for verification.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2019
    
    Date: 04-12-2019
    Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
    He tendered registered NM no 2450/19 t.o.r.
    ORDER BELOW NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2450 OF 2019
    Present N/M is taken out in Suit No.1195 of 19 which is already  disposed of in view of order dated 3.12.2019.  That cause no more exist. Hence, plaintiff does not want to prosecute NM. Therefore, N/M stands dismissed for want of prosecution
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 04-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 107222/2019
    Filing Date: 03-07-2019
    First Hearing Date: 13th August 2019
    Decision Date: 04th December 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    04 Dec 2019
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 4.12.2019
    NM 2450/19
    SU 1195/
    (Disposed of
    )
    CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02)
    Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
    He tendered registered NM no 2450/19 t.o.r.
    ORDER BELOW NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2450 OF 2019
    Present N/M is taken out in Suit No.1195 of 19 which is already
    disposed of in view of order dated 3.12.2019. That cause no more
    exist. Hence, plaintiff does not want to prosecute NM. Therefore,
    N/M stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.