Full Order Text
Order 1 · 29 Mar 2019 · CNR MHCC010066942018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.809/2018 Received on : 05.06.2018 Registered on : 04.08.2018 Decided on : 29.03.2019 Duration : Y M D 00 09 25 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 809 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010066942018 Falco Auto Corporation, A proprietary firm Having its office at 22, Dilip Niwas, Benham Hall Lane Opera House, Mumbai – 400 004 through its Proprietor Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur Chadha Aged 49 years, Indian, Inhabitant of Mumbai. ...Plaintiff Versus 1. Chetan Automobiles, Proprietor firm having their Address at RazaeGarib Complex, Near New Bus stand BM Road, Channarayapatna 573111, District Hassan, Karnataka State. 2. Mr. Doreswamy M., adult, Indian, inhabitant proprietor of defendant No.1 -- 1 of 9 -- :2: Summary Suit No.809/2018 Chetan Automobiles, r/at RazaeGarib Complex, Near New Bus stand BM Road, Channarayapatna 573111, District Hassan, Karnataka State. ...Defendants. Appearances: Advocate Ashnin for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 29th MARCH, 2019. [ J U D G M E N T ] Allegations of plaintiff in short is as under : 1. Plaintiff has stated that against the defendants valid and confirmed order of them supplied goods to the defendant from time to time on credit basis. The copies of the Invoices are as under: Invoice No.245 dated 30.06.2014 for Rs.14,873/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463303494 dated 10.07.2014 Article2, Invoice No.260 dated 23.07.2014 for Rs.4,818/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463266585 dated 23.04.2014 Article1, Invoice No.268 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,324/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463329286 dated 6.08.2014 Article3, Invoice No.269 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.19,721/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463329287 dated 6.08.2014 Article2, Invoice No.290 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.18,115/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463901011 dated 9.08.2014 Article2, Invoice -- 2 of 9 -- :3: Summary Suit No.809/2018 No.291 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.19,744/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt no.463901010 dated 9.8.2014 Article1, Invoice No.292 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,501/, Invoice No.293 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.13399/, Invoice No.317 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17169/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463904219 dated 28.08.2014 Article2, Invoice No.330 dated 28.08.2014 for Rs.12,836/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463271860 dated 30.08.2014 Article1, Invoice No.512 dated 20.11.2014 for Rs.1,849/ and Invoice No.641 dated 18.2.2015 for Rs.4,651/. The defendants have a running credit account in the account books of the plaintiff operated in the due course of business. That the plaintiff has raised bills of each and every consignment for payment and the defendants have acknowledged the receipt of such bills raised by the plaintiff. 2. Plaintiff has further state that the defendants had placed orders to them from time to time. That the defendants had issued a cheque in favour of them bearing No.000025 dated1192017 for Rs.1,50,990/ drawn on HDFC Bank. However, the cheque was dishonoured with the remark “Other reasons”. Therefore, plaintiff through their Advocate M/s. V. Kadam Associate had issued a legal demand notice to defendant No.1 by speed post on 13.09.2017 for a sum of Rs.2,50,193/ inclusive of dishonoured cheque charges. Plaintiff has further stated that there is now thus due and payable by the defendants to them the sum of Rs.1,50,990/ being the principal amount alongwith the amount of interest at the rate of 18% per annum from one month of credit suit as per the particulars of claim. The defendant is also bound and liable to pay further interest after the due of filing of the suit till the date of payment and realisation and cost of the suit. Therefore, plaintiff filed the present suit. -- 3 of 9 -- :4: Summary Suit No.809/2018 3. Defendants failed to appear in the suit, therefore, suit has proceeded exparte against both the defendants. 4. Heard the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. 5. Following points arise for determination and their findings followed by reasons are as stated below. Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to get amount of Rs.2,50,193/ from defendants along with interest @ 18% p. a. on the principal sum of Rs.1,50,990/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation ? ...Partly in the affirmative. 2. What order and Decree ? ...As per final order REASONS 6. Plaintiff has filed evidence of Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur Chadha (P.W.1) in the form of affidavit below Exh.5. Plaintiff relied upon the following documents as documentary evidence which are as under : Sr. No. Exhibits Particulars 1. Exh.7 Original Invoice No.245 dated 30.06.2014 for Rs.14873/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463303494 dt10.07.2014 article2 of VRL Logistics Ltd., Invoice No.260 dated – 23.07.2014 for Rs.4,818/ along with its Lorry Receipt No.463266585 dt 23.04.2014 Article1 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.268 dated – -- 4 of 9 -- :5: Summary Suit No.809/2018 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,324/ along with its Lorry Receipt No.463329286 dt6.08.2014 Article3 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.269 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.19,721/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463329287 dt6.08.2014 Article2 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.290 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.18,115/ along with its Lorry Receipt No.463901011 dated 9.08.2014 Article 2 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.291 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.19,744/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt no.463901010 dated 9.8.2014 Article1 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.292 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,501/, Invoice No.293 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.13,399/, Invoice No.317 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,169/ along with its Lorry Receipt No.463904219 dated 28.08.2014 Article2 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.330 dated 28.08.2014 for Rs.12,836/ along with its Lorry Receipt No.463271860 dated 30.08.2014 Article1 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.512 dated 20.11.2014 for Rs.1,849/ and Invoice No.641 dated 18.2.2015 for Rs.4,651/. 2. Exh.8 Original Cheque and Bank return memo stating reason of dishonor 3. Exh.9 Original accounts statement of the plaintiff with the defendant. 4. Exh.10 Original legal demand notice dated 13.09.2017 issued by the plaintiff's Advocate to the defendant along with RPAD receipt and signed postal acknowledgment -- 5 of 9 -- :6: Summary Suit No.809/2018 5. Exh.11 Particulars of claim. AS TO POINT NOS. 1 AND 2: 7. Plaintiff has filed evidence of Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur Chadha (P.W.1) in the form of affidavit below Exh.5 and stated that against the defendants valid and confirmed order the plaintiff sold and supplied goods to the defendant from time to time on credit basis. The copies of the Invoices are as under : Invoice No.245 dated 30.06.2014 for Rs.14,873/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463303494 dated 10.07.2014 Article 2 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.260 dated 23.07.2014 for Rs.4,818/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463266585 dated 23.04.2014 Article 1 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.268 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,324/ along with its Lorry Receipt No.463329286 dated 6.08.2014 Article 3 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.269 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.19,721/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463329287 dated 6.08.2014 Article 2 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.290 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.18,115/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463901011 dated 9.08.2014 Article 2 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.291 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.19,744/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt no.463901010 dated 09.8.2014 Article 1 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.292 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,501/, Invoice No.293 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.13,399/, Invoice No.317 dated 31.07.2014 for Rs.17,169/ alongwith its Lorry Receipt No.463904219 dated 28.08.2014 Article 2 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.330 dated 28.08.2014 for Rs.12,836/ along with its Lorry Receipt No.463271860 dated 30.08.2014 Article 1 of VRL Logistics Ltd, Invoice No.512 dated 20.11.2014 for Rs.1,849/ and Invoice No.641 dated 18.2.2015 for Rs.4,651/. P.W.1 has further stated that the defendants had issue a cheque in favour of them bearing No.000025 dated 11.09.2017 for -- 6 of 9 -- :7: Summary Suit No.809/2018 Rs.1,50,990/ drawn on HDFC Bank, which was dishonoured with the remark “Other Reasons”. 8. P.W.1, Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur Chadha has further stated that defendants have not paid a single penny till date out of the amount that is due and thus the defendants have admitted their liability and thus acknowledges the outstanding amount as their debt. P.W.1 has further stated that there is now due and payable by the defendants to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.1,50,990/ being the principal amount alongwith the amount of interest @ 18% per annum from one month of credit limit being 15.08.2014 till filing of the present suit as per the particulars of claim. 9. Plaintiff has adduced original original invoices, Lorry receipts, original cheques, Bank return memo, original accounts statement, demand notice and postal acknowledgment on record as documentary evidence. The oral evidence of plaintiff is corroborated by documentary evidence. Defendants have failed to challenge all the allegations in the plaint and evidence of plaintiff. Due to all these circumstances, plaintiff has proved that he is entitled to get sum of Rs.2,50,193/ from both the defendants jointly. 10. It appears that as per Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it will be proper to direct defendants to give interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.1,50,990/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. Hence, answer point No.1 partly in the affirmative and pass following Order: ORDER 1. Suit is partly decreed with cost. -- 7 of 9 -- :8: Summary Suit No.809/2018 2. Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are jointly directed to pay amount of Rs.2,50,193/ to plaintiff along with interest @ 9% p.a. on the principal sum of Rs.1,50,990/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee be refunded as per rules. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 29.03.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 29.03.2019 Transcribed on : 29.03.2019 Signed on : 29.03.2019 -- 8 of 9 -- :9: Summary Suit No.809/2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 05.04.2019 At 4:27 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 29.03.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 29.03.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 05.04.2019 -- 9 of 9 --
