Skip to main content
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT

Jyoti Datta WaghVsAnand Sitaram Gamre

CNR MHCC01006693201961-COURT 61 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--PARTLY DECREED
Decision Date: 20th March 2023

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100243/2021
Registration Date
05 Mar 2021

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 37

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 30-04-2021
    Business: In view of Office Order No. 81/21, only urgent matters taken up. Hence, board discharged.
    Matter adjd to 26.06.2021.
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 26-06-2021
    
    Date: 26-06-2021
    Business: In view of Office Order No.117/2021 dated 24.06.2021, as holiday declared on 26.06.2021, the board is discharged and the matter is adjd to
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2021
    
    Date: 09-09-2021
    Business: Court is vacant
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2021
    
    Date: 29-10-2021
    Business: Court is Vacant.
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2022
    
    Date: 15-01-2022
    Business: None present.
    Matter is adjd for Report to 01.02.2022.
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2022
    
    Date: 01-02-2022
    Business: None present.
    Matter is adjd for report  on 15-02-2022
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2022
    
    Date: 15-02-2022
    Business: Adv Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    None for defendant.
    Matter is adjd for report  on 04-04-2022
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 04-04-2022
    
    Date: 04-04-2022
    Business: P.O. is on Training
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2022
    
    Date: 13-06-2022
    Business: None for Plaintiff.
    Affidavit of Service is not filed.  Plaintiff directed to take appropriate steps to serve the Defendant, otherwise suit would be dismissed in default.
    Matter adjourned to 18/07/2022 for Report.
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2022
    
    Date: 18-07-2022
    Business: Adv. Mr. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present.
    Plaint – Exhibit-1
    Vakalatnama – Exhibit-2
    Memorandum of Address – Exhibit-3
    List of Documents – Exhibit-4
    Adv. for Plaintiff filed Affidavit of Service.  Service  is complete on 23/11/2021.  However, Defendant has not caused appearance.  Hence, suit to proceed Ex-parte.
    Matter adjourned to 11/10/2022  for Ex-parte Evidence.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2022
    
    Date: 11-10-2022
    Business: Adv.Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.  He filed affidavit of evidence Exh-6 alongwith list of documents Exh-7.
    Original copy of Promissory Note dated 02/07/2016. (Exh-8)
    Office copy of the plaintiff\''s advocates letters dated 24/06/2019. (Exh-9)
    Matter is adj to 20/12/2022 for ex-parte argument.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2022
    
    Date: 20-12-2022
    Business: As Court is busy in dictating judgment in SUM No.1205/15, hence matter on board at Sr. No.2 to 11 is discharged. Matter is adj to 13/01/2023 for arguments.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2023
    
    Date: 13-01-2023
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENT P.H.
    Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2023
    
    Date: 13-01-2023
    
    Date: 18-02-2023
    Business: Adv.Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    None for defendant (Ex-parte).
              During the court of argument, it is found that plaintiff has not placed on record the proof regarding service of demand notice dated 24/06/2019.  Ld.Adv. for plaintiff submits that though the said proof of service is not placed on record, however summons is duly served on defendant.  Defendant has not denied the claim by causing appearance.  By virtue of sub rule (3) of Rule 2 of order XXXVII of CPC, plaintiff, owing to non appearance of defendant is entitled for decree.
            Though the Ld.Adv. for plaintiff is right with respect to presumption carved out under sub rule (3) of Rule 2 of order XXXVII of CPC, still this court is of the opinion that the demand must be proved by the plaintiff so as to show entitlement for decree.
          Ld.Adv. for plaintiff seeks time to file additional claim affidavit.  Time granted.
    Matter is adj to 27/02/2023 for additional affidavit/argument P.H.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENT P.H.
    Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2023
    
    Date: 27-02-2023
    Business: CORAM - H.H.J. DR. SHRI. S. D. TAWSHIKAR - (C.R.NO.61)
    None for plaintiff.
    Matter is adj to 20.03.2023 for Ex-parte argument P/H.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENT P.H.
    Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2023
    
    Date: 20-03-2023
    Business: CORAM - H.H.J. DR. SHRI. S. D. TAWSHIKAR - (C.R.NO.61)
    Adv.Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.  He filed original courier receipt the returned envelope of Demand Notice. T.O.R marked as Exh-10.
    Heard Ld.Adv. for plaintiff.
    F.R.S.R following order is passed
    ORDER
    1)	Summary Suit No.  243 of 2021 is hereby partly decreed with 	cost.
    2)	Defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two 	Lakhs Only) to the plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 	09% per annum from the date of filing of the suit i.e. 	29/06/2019, till realization of entire amount.
    3)  	Plaintiff is entitled for refund of court fees as per rules.
    4)	Decree be drawn up accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: PARTLY DECREED
    Disposal Date: 20-03-2023

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 107128/2019
    Filing Date: 29-06-2019
    First Hearing Date: 30th April 2021
    Decision Date: 20th March 2023
    Court Number And Judge: 61-COURT 61 ADDL  SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    20 Mar 2023

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 MHCC010066932019 Presented on :29062019 Registered on :05032021 Decided on :20032023 Duration :3Y8M21D EXHIBIT11 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 243 OF 2021 JYOTI DATTA WAGH age.31 Years, of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant having her address at 1/11, Ram Niwas Chawl Sunder Baug, Kurla(West), Mumbai400 070 through her C.A. Manjusha Nandkishor Shete age years. ...Plaintiff Versus ANAND SITARAM GAMRE Age not known of Mumbai, an adult…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.