Skip to main content
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT

Jyoti Datta WaghVsUttam Raj Tambe

CNR MHCC01006692201913-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DECREED
Decision Date: 21st September 2022

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100717/2021
Registration Date
16 Feb 2021

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Jyoti Datta Wagh

    Respondent

    1. 1Uttam Raj Tambe

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 37

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-04-2021
    Business: The Hon''ble Principal Judge of City Civil and Sessions Court, Gr. Bombay as per Office Order No. 79/2021 dtd. 12.04.2021 in pursuance of the Hon''ble Bombay High Court Letter No. Insp/I/32/2021 dtd. 12.04.2021 declared holidays for the court on Thursday 15.04.2021 and Friday 16.04.2021 so as to take precautionary measures and to break the chain of Corona virus.
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2021
    
    Date: 09-07-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: REPORT
    Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2021
    
    Date: 26-08-2021
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    Exh.2- Adv. For plaintiff tendered service affidavit. T.O.R.
             Perused the proceeding sheet and plaint.
    2.     Suit was initially registered as a Summary Suit. Thereafter, it was transferred to the Commercial Court treating the dispute as a commercial dispute.
    3.    Section 12 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015  makes a provision for determination of specified value.  As per section 12 (1)(a) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, where the relief sought in a suit or application is for recovery of money, the money sought to be recovered in a suit or application inclusive of interest, if any, computed upto the date of filing of the suit or application, as the case may be, shall be taken into account for determining such specified value.
    4.    Plaintiff is seeking recovery of the amount of Rs.2,99,000/-.  She has also valued the suit for said amount. Thus, as per section 12(1)(a) of  the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, specified value of the present suit would be Rs.2,99,000/-.  Present suit does not qualify as a Commercial dispute considering the valuation of the claim made by the plaintiff.  Therefore, matter be sent to the Office of Registrar (Civil) for further assignment.
    Matter is adjd for compliance of above order to 06.09.2021.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2021
    
    Date: 06-09-2021
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    None for defendant.
    In view of Ex.02 defendant is served but failed to appear. Hence, suit is proceed to exparte against defendant.
    Matter adjd for exparte evidence to 30-10-2021.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2021
    
    Date: 30-10-2021
    Business: None present.
    Matter adjd for ex-parte evidence on 10/12/2021.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2021
    
    Date: 10-12-2021
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    None present for defendant.
    Matter Adjd for ex-parte evidence on 02/02/2022.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 02-02-2022
    
    Date: 02-02-2022
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2022
    
    Date: 11-03-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    None present for defendant.
    Exh.03 - Claim Affidavit. O-Read and recorded.
    Exh.04 - List of documents. O- be filed.
    Heard Ld. Adv. For plaintiff on admissibility of documents.
    Order on Admissibility of documents
    Exh.05 - Promissory note dt.02/07/2016.
    Exh.06 - Legal Notice dt.24/06/2019
    Article A - Photocopy of Money lending licence.
    Article B - Photocopy of form No.8.
    Article C - Photocopy of books  of account.
    Exh. 07 -  Evidence closing pursis. O-seen.
    Matter Adjd for ex-parte argument  on 30/04/2022.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 30-04-2022
    
    Date: 30-04-2022
    Business: P. O. is on leave.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2022
    
    Date: 13-07-2022
    Business: P.O. is on leave.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 25-08-2022
    
    Date: 25-08-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain  for plaintiff present.
    None present for defendant.
    Heard final argument of plaintiff.
    Matter Adjd for ex-parte judgment on 21/09/2022.
    Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2022
    
    Date: 21-09-2022
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present.
    None present for defendant.
    F.R.S.R. following order in Summary Suit No.717 of 2021 is passed-
    ORDER
    1. The Summary Suit No.717 of 2021 is decreed with costs.
    2. Defendant shall pay amount of Rs.2,99,000.00/- (Rupees Two Lacs Ninety Nine Thousand Only) to the plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 9 percent per annum on the principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/-(Rupees Two Lacs Only) from the date of filing suit till its actual realisation.
    3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
    4. Court fee if any be refunded as per rules to the plaintiff.
    5. Judgment is dictated and pronounced in open court.
    R and P be sent to Record Department.
    Nature Of Disposal: DECREED
    Disposal Date: 21-09-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 107130/2019
    Filing Date: 29-06-2019
    First Hearing Date: 15th April 2021
    Decision Date: 21st September 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 13-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    21 Sept 2022

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010066922019 Presented on 29-06-2019 Registered on 16-02-2021 Decided on 21-09-2022 Duration Yrs. M. Days 03 02 22 CNR No. MHCC010066922019 EXH.08 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.717 OF 2021 JYOTI DATTA WAGH Age 31 years of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant having her addresss at 1/11, Ram Niwas Chawl, Sunder Baug, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070. through Her C.A. Manjusha Nandkishor Shete. ...Plaintiff. V/s. UTTAM RAJ TAMBE age…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.