NOTICE OF MOTION
Sharda Jaya PoojariVsMCGM And Anr
CNR MHCC0100668620194-COURT 04 AD-HOC JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 20th January 2024
TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 102434/2019
- Registration Date
- 03 Jul 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 05-07-2019
Business: Adv. Mohan Shetty for plaintiff present and tendered original NM No. 2434/19 with affidavit. He also tendered original writ of summons.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present and filed documents. Copies given to other side.
Order on ad-interim relief.
Perused NM, plaint, documents annexed to the plaint, documents filed by defendant MCGM along with affidavit and heard both sides. The plaintiff challenges show cause notice u/s 351 of MMC Act in respect of alleged unauthorized construction of shop in compulsory open space of the building as given in the notice. By the said notice plaintiff is directed to show sufficient cause why such building shall not be removed, altered or pulled down. Explanation to section 351 (b) provides meaning of to show sufficient cause to mean to prove that the work mentioned in the said notice is carried out in accordance with provisions of sections 337 or 342 or sec. 347 of MMC Act. In the instant matter plaintiff relies his claim of such sufficient cause on rent receipts, registration certificate of the shop, electricity bills, telephone bills. None of these documents establish that the building is erected in accordance with above provisions. Ld. Adv. for the defendant has tendered sanctioned plan of the building which does not show existence of the suit premises/shop. The plaintiff has averred that the suit shop is in existence since prior to 1962 but his rent receipts are starting from 1983. As such there are no document to prove authorization of the suit shop or that it is tolerated structure under the policy of defendant MCGM. Hence plaintiff is not entitled for ad-interim relief and the same is rejected.
Adjd to 16.09.2019 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2019
Date: 16-09-2019
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Mr. S.C. Khandagale for Deft/MCGM present.
On oral request of Ld. Adv. for defendant, adjournment is granted.
Adjd to 20/12/2019 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2019
Date: 20-12-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2020
Date: 11-03-2020
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present.
On oral request of advocate for Defendant, adjournment granted.
Matter adjd to 24.06.2020 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2020
Date: 24-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2020
Date: 28-09-2020
Business: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2020
Date: 14-12-2020
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Khandagale for deft/MCGM present and requests for time to file reply to NM No.2434/19. Time is granted till next date.
Matter adjd to 22/02/2021 for NM Reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2021
Date: 22-02-2021
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2021
Date: 23-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 09-08-2021
Date: 09-08-2021
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for Defendant/MCGM is present and requests for time to file reply to NM. Time is granted till next date.
Adjd. To 13/10/2021 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-10-2021
Date: 13-10-2021
Business: As Court is busy in hearing urgent Ad-interim matter and dictating orders on Ad-interim reliefs of CR NO.08 and CR NO.11, board is discharged and matter is adjourned.
Adjd. To 20/12/2021 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2021
Date: 20-12-2021
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for Defendant/MCGM is present and seeks time to file reply to NM. Time is granted till next date.
Matter is adjd to 21/03/2022 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2022
Date: 21-03-2022
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv Mrs Tondwalkar for defendant / MCGM is present and requests for time to file reply to NM. Time is granted till next date.
Adjd. To 15/06/2022 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2022
Date: 15-06-2022
Business: H.H.J. is on leave today.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2022
Date: 17-08-2022
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant / MCGM is present and requests for time to file reply to NM. Time is granted till next date
Adjd. to 10/10/2022 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2022
Date: 10-10-2022
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/ BMC is present and requested time to file reply to N/M. Time is granted till next date.
Adjd. to 16/12/2022 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2022
Date: 16-12-2022
Business: Adjd. to 21/02/2023.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2023
Date: 21-02-2023
Business: As Court is busy in hearing urgent N/M and ad-interim relief and passing order in N/M, board is discharged.
Adjd. to 15/06/2023 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2023
Date: 15-06-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Mhatre h/f Adv. Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present and seeks time to file reply to NM, Time is granted.
Adjd to 07.08.2023 for NM Reply
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2023
Date: 07-08-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present and seeks time to file reply to NM. Time is granted as a last chance.
Adjd to 20.09.2023 for NM Reply
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2023
Date: 20-09-2023
Business: None for plaintiff
Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for B.M.C. present and requested time to file reply to N/M-Granted
Adjd. to 29/9/2023 for N/M. reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2023
Date: 29-09-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present and seeks time to file reply to NM. Time is granted
Adjd to 30.10.2023 for NM Reply
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2023
Date: 30-10-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present and tendered NM Reply. Taken on record. Copy of plaintiff kept in R & P.
Adjd to 24.11.2023 for NM Hearing
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 24-11-2023
Date: 24-11-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Today matte is posted for NM hearing but none present for plaintiff. Hence matter adjourned and kept for dismissal of NM
Adjd to 16.12.2023 for Dismissal of NM
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2023
Date: 16-12-2023
Business: As PO is on training at Uttan, matter is adjourned
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2023
Date: 21-12-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
Adjd to 20.01.2024 for NM Dismissal
Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2024
Date: 20-01-2024
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Mhatre h/f Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present.
keep back
Later on 4.40 p.m
This NM is of year 2019 and it is pending for hearing. The roznama shows that since many dates neither plaintiff nor his Adv remains present. Hence NM is kept for dismissal but inspite of that today none appeared for the plaintiff. This shows that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the NM. Hence I have no option but to dismiss the NM for want of prosecution. Hence I pass following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No. 2434/19 is dismissed for want of prosecution
Adjd to 13.03.2024 for NO WS order
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 20-01-2024Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 107203/2019 Filing Date: 03-07-2019 First Hearing Date: 05th July 2019 Decision Date: 20th January 2024 Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 AD-HOC JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 120 Jan 2024
20 Jan 2024
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 73 Dt:20.01.2024 SU 1581/19 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI S.H. SALUNKHE ( C.R. No. 04 ) None present for plaintiff Advocate Mhatre h/f Suryavanshi for defendant/BMC present. keep back Later on 4.40 p.m This NM is of year 2019 and it is pending for hearing. The roznama shows that since many dates neither plaintiff nor his Adv remains present. Hence NM is kept for dismissal but inspite of that today none appeared for the plaintiff. This shows that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the NM. Hence I have no option but to dismiss the NM for want of prosecution. Hence I pass following order. ORDER Notice of Motion No. 2434/19 is dismissed for want of prosecution Adjd to 13.03.2024 for NO WS order Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
