Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 30 Nov 2023 · CNR MHCC010066072019
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 1 MHCC010066072019 Presented on : 24-06-2019 Registered on : 12-07-2019 Decided on : 30-11-2023 Duration : 4 Y, 5 M, 6 D IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GR. BOMBAY AT MUMBAI SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.2033 OF 2019. Exh. CANARA BANK, ] Banking Company, constituted and functioning ] under the provisions of the the Banking ] Companies (Acquisition & Transfer ] of Undertakings) Act.,1970 ] having their central Office at Bengaluru, ] Pin 560 002, an Karnataka State and a Branch ] Office Matunga Mansion -2 ] Bhandarkar Rd, Matunga (East) ] Mumbai 400 019. the Suit is filed by ] Mr. Munna Khalkhao, Age 36 years, ] Senior Manager & Power of Attorney Holder ]....Plaintiff. Vs. Mr.Abdul Khaliq Asgarali, 51 Yrs ] R.No. A-104, New Annasagar CHSL, ] A.G.Link Road, Sakinaka, ] Mumbai – 400 072. ]….Defendant. Appearance: Adv. Ms.Sivoj Sutale for the plaintiff. Defendant – Exparte. -- 1 of 8 -- Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 2 SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY Coram : Shri. U.C.Deshmukh. Judge. CR No. : 59. Date :30th November, 2023. ORAL JUDGMENT This is suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,84,064/- at the rate of interest 11.20% p.a. Brief facts of the plaintiff’s case are as under : 2. The plaintiff contends that it is a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act 1970. It further contends that at around 11th December, 2014, defendant requested plaintiff for vehicle loan to purchase Brand New TATA Indica. The plaintiff disbursed loan of Rs.2,70,000/- on 12.12.2014. Accordingly, the defendant executed undertaking on 12.12.2014 to repay the loan. He also executed Hypothecation Deed of the Car on 12.12.2014. 3. The plaintiff specifically contends that on 07.05.2019 defendant failed to repay the loan. Hence, notice was issued to repay the loan worth of Rs.1,84,064/-. Hence, this suit. 4. Defendant is duly served with writ of summons but he failed to appear. Therefore, the suit proceeded exparte against the defendant as per order dated 03.04.2023. -- 2 of 8 -- Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 3 5. After suit proceeded exparte, the plaintiff examined one witness viz. Mr. Sherly Hebran, Sr. Manager of Plaintiff’s Bank who has filed his affidavit in lieu of examination in chief at Exh. 5. The Plaintiff has also filed list of documents at Exh.6. The plaintiff filed evidence close pursis vide Exh.7. The plaintiff filed following documents along with Exh.6 which is as follows : Sr. No. Documents. Exhibits 1. Authority Letter dated 24.07.2023 Exh. A 2. Loan Application and interview sum Appraisal Form for Transport Operators Exh. B 3. Appraisal cum Recommendation LHV- Loan Dated 11.12.2014 Exh. C 4. Sanction Letter dated 11th December, 2014 Exh.D 5. Letter of Undertaking re-loan/Advance dated 12.12.2014 Exh. E 6 Deed of Hypothecation Re-Vehicle dated 12.12.2014 Exh.F 7 Acknowledgment of Debt and Security dated 08.12.2016 Exh. F 8 Plaintiff’s Advocate Notice dated 08.05.2019 Exh. H 9. Postal Receipt Exh. I 10. RC Copy Exh. J 11. Invoice dated 13.12.2014 issued by dealer Exh. K 12. Statement of Account Exh. L 13. I.T.Certificate Exh. M. -- 3 of 8 -- Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 4 6. It is submission made by Ld.advocate for the plaintiff that the suit is proceeded exparte. The pleading and evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged. Hence, there is no reason to discard the suit. Consequently, prayed to decree the suit. 7. Considering the facts, evidence and law applicable to the case, following points arise for determination.: Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.1,84,064/-with interest at the rate of 11.20% p.a. from the date of the suit? ..Partly Yes.. with interest @ 10.15% pa. 2. Whether the suit is within the limitation? ..Yes.. 3. What order and decree? Suit is partly decreed. :REASON: As to point No. 1 & 2: 8. It is needless to say that as suit proceeded exparte, hence, the pleading and evidence of the plaintiff has remained unchallenged. Therefore, there is no reason to discard the case at threashhold. 9. The affidavit of evidence at Exh.5 and documents filed on record show that the term loan was sanctioned by the plaintiff to defendant but he failed to pay. The plaintiff succeeded to show that the amount of Rs.1,84,064/- was due from defendants on account of loan advanced to him. Now peculiar question arise, whether the suit is within the limitation. -- 4 of 8 -- Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 5 10. The plaintiff has filed on copy of account of statement which show that on 13.06.2019 defendant was bound to pay suit amount. It also show that the defendant has lastly made payment of 11.05.2018 and it has also executed acknowledgment on 08.12.2016. Considering the contends of statement of account, the plaintiff successfully show that the defendant is bound to pay suit amount and suit is within the limitation. 11. The plaintiff claimed an interest at the rate of 11.20% p.a. However, the account of statement itself show that the plaintiff charged the rate of interest at the rate of 10.15% p.a..Hence, it would be just and proper to award the interest at the rate of 10.15% p.a. Accordingly, point Nos. 1 & 2 answered. 12. Non payment of the suit amount constrained the plaintiff to institute the suit. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to cost. Accordingly, in answer to point No. 3, following order is passed : ORDER 1. Suit No. 2033 of 2019 is partly decreed as under with cost. 2. The defendant is ordered to pay an amount of Rs.1,84,064/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.15% p.a. from the date of the suit till entire amount is realised. 3. The defendant shall directed to pay aforesaid decreetal amount within 2 months of the order. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. -- 5 of 8 -- Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 6 5. Suit No. 2033 of 2019 is disposed off accordingly. (Dictated and Pronounced in Open Court) (U.C.Deshmukh) Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court Date.:30.11.2023 Greater Bombay (CR 59) Declared on : 30.11.2023 Dictated on : 30.11.2023 Transcribed on : 05.12.2023 Checked on : 06.12.2023 Signed on : 12.12.2023 at 5.30 -p.m. Mrs. P.R.Wagh UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) HHJ SHRI.U.C.Deshmukh,(C.R.No.59) Judge.,City Civil & Sessions Court, Date of pronouncement of /Order 30.11.2023 Order signed by P.O. on 12.12.2023 order uploaded on 12.12.2023 -- 6 of 8 -- Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 7 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 14.08.2023 at 12.30 -p.m. Mrs. P.R.Wagh UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) HHJ SHRI.U.C.Deshmukh,(C.R.No.59) Judge.,City Civil & Sessions Court, Date of pronouncement of /Order 15.07.2023 Order signed by P.O. on 10.08.2023 order uploaded on 14.08.2023 -- 7 of 8 -- Judgment in Suit No. 2023 of 2019 8 -- 8 of 8 --
