Full Order Text
Interim Order 1 · 17 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010065732019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION IN SUIT NO.1601 OF 2019 Alliance Sajawat Group ... Plaintiff V/s 1. M/s. Sai Mangal Developers ... Defendant And The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent APPEARANCE: Advocate Thakordas & Madgavkar for plaintiff. CORAM : H. H. ADHOC JUDGE SHRI MILIND A. BHOSALE (COURT ROOM NO. 32) DATE : 17th January, 2020 ORDER Perused draft Notice of Motion and affidavit. I have heard Ld.Counsel for plaintiff before granting leave to register Notice of Motion. It is submitted by the plaintiff that defendant restrained by an order of injunction against taking coercive action against the plaintiff except according to due process of law and not to file any FIR or complaint or any other proceeding against the plaintiff in the subject matter of issues between the parties except with leave of court and except without notice to the plaintiff. It is further submitted by the plaintiff that senior Inspector of Tilak Nagar Police station, Dist Thane be restrained for entertainment of complaint or FIR against the plaintiff except with leave the court and after notice to the plaintiff. -- 1 of 3 -- 2 Plaintiff seek relief of injunction by way of Notice of Motion therefore, it is necessary on the part of plaintiff to prove prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss in the present Notice of Motion. Plaintiff failed to file any evidence in support of Notice of Motion. Moreover, plaintiff failed to explain under which legal provision court has power to issue injunction to restrain police machinery to take action against him. Perusal of contention in the Notice of Motion established that the contention in the Notice of Motion is vague in nature without supporting any documentary evidence. Under such circumstances, court cannot have any power to issue such type of order as prayed by plaintiff. Therefore, I find that no prima facie case is made out by the plaintiff balance of convenience is not in his favour, there is no case which is disclosed that he has suffered irreparable loss. Hence, I pass following order. ORDER 1) Draft Notice of Motion is dismissed with costs. 2) Draft Notice of Motion be sent to the office for statistical purpose. Date:17/01/2020 (Milind A.Bhosale) AdHoc Judge City Civil & Sessions Court, Gr.Bombay Dictated on : 17/01/2020 Typed on : 17/01/2020 H.H.J.Signed on : 17/01/2020 -- 2 of 3 -- 3 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 17.01.2020 at 4.35 p.m. (Mrs.P.P.Khanvilkar) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room no.) SHRI M.A.BHOSALE (C.R. NO.32) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 17.01.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 17.01.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 17.01.2020 -- 3 of 3 --
