Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 10 Mar 2022 · CNR MHCC010065042019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010065042019 Presented on 25-06-2019 Registered on 07-10-2019 Decided on 10-03-2022 Duration Yrs. M. Days 02 08 15 CNR No. MHCC010065042019 EXH.20 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.972 OF 2019 JEEVANDEEP EDUMEDIA PVT. LTD. Having registered office at Sun Paradise Business Plaza, First Floor, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai 400 013. Through its Assistant Manager Legal Mrs. Neha Nachiket Kulkarni ...Plaintiff. V/s. 1. MR. LAXMAN JAGTAP Founder, Age not known, Occupation not known, Gurukul English Medium School (Shri Dattakrupa Seva Pratishan’s), Taluka Baramati, District Pune at & Post : Jalgaon Supe 413 102.Maharashtra 2. GURUKUL ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL (Shri Dattakrupa Seva Pratishtan’s) age not applicable,Occp; Not Applicable, Taluka Baramati, district Pune At & Post : Jalgaon Supe 413 102, Maharashtra. ....Defendants. M -- 1 of 5 -- Suit 628 of 2016 .. J/2 .. Judgment Appearances: Ld. Adv. Hetal Vakil for plaintiff. None present for defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. R.K. KSHIRSAGAR (C.R.No.13) DATED : 10th March, 2022 J U D G M E N T (Exparte) 1. The present Summary Suit is filed by plaintiff for recovery of amount of Rs.1,52,179.71/ (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Two Thousand One Hundred Seventy Nine and Seventy One Paise Only) alongwith interest on the principal sum of Rs.1,10,410/(Rupees One Lakh Ten Thousand Four Hundred and Ten Only) at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of the suit till its realization. 2. The facts in brief are as follows: The plaintiff is a Private Limited Company carrying on business. The plaintiff is carrying its business as Education Publishers. The defendant No.1 is running the school in the name of defendant no.2. Pursuant to the purchase order from time to time the plaintiff sold, supplied and delivered the goods to the defendants through transport Company. The defendant accepted the goods. In the due course of business the plaintiff raised invoices but the defendant failed to make the payment on due date as per terms and conditions agreed between them. The plaintiff send legal notices but the defendant failed to pay the amount and therefore, plaintiff filed the present suit and prayed to decree the outstanding amount. -- 2 of 5 -- Suit 628 of 2016 .. J/3 .. Judgment 3. The defendants were duly served but they failed to appear and therefore, suit was proceeded Exparte against defendants as per order dated 18.08.2021. 4. The plaintiff in order to prove its claim filed the claim affidavit vide Exh.03 and list of documents vide Exh.04. The plaintiff filed the documents which were marked as Exh.05 to Exh.18. The plaintiff filed copy of Board Resolution vide Exh.5 and 06, purchase order vide Exh.7. The plaintiff also filed lorry receipts and the invoices alongwith credit note and Sales ledger vide Exh.08 to 15. The plaintiff filed the office copy of the legal notice alongwith postal receipts and acknowledgement. It seems that the defendant placed the order of supply of the books and the same were delivered to the defendant through transport. The defendants accepted and acknowledged the same, however failed to pay the outstanding amount. The plaintiff issued various legal notices but the defendant failed to repay the amount. The defendants failed to appear and challenge the evidence of plaintiff. The oral and documentary evidence of plaintiff has therefore, gone unchallenged. The plaintiff supplied the goods but the defendants failed to pay the outstanding amount alongwith interest. Hence, plaintiff is entitled for the decree. 5. The plaintiff demanded the principal amount with further interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The interest at the rate of 18% per annum is exorbitant and therefore, it cannot be granted to the plaintiff. Considering the nature of transaction the interest at the rate of 9% per annum will suffice the purpose of justice therefore, I, proceed to pass the following order: -- 3 of 5 -- Suit 628 of 2016 .. J/4 .. Judgment ORDER 1. The Summary suit no.972 of 2019 is decreed with costs. 2. The Defendants No.1 and 2 shall jointly and severally pay amount of Rs.1,52,179.71/ (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Two Thousand One Hundred Seventy Nine and Seventy One Paise Only) to the plaintiff along with further interest at the rate of 9 percent per annum on the principal amount of Rs.1,10,410/(Rupees One Lakh Ten Thousand Four Hundred and Ten Only) from the date of filing suit till its actual realisation. 3. Decree be drawn up accordingly. 4. Court fee if any be refunded as per rules to the plaintiff. 5. Judgment is dictated and pronounced in open court. R and P be sent to Record Department. ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) Dt.: 10032022 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI Direct typed on : 10032022 checked on : 10032022 Signed on : 10032022 ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 4 of 5 -- Suit 628 of 2016 .. J/5 .. Judgment “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 17.03.2022 at 03.25 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (YATISH R. JAGDALE) NAME OF TYPIST Name of the Judge H.H.J.Smt.R.K.Kshirsagar (COURT ROOM NO.13) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 15.03.2022 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 15.03.2022 Judgment/order uploaded on 17.03.2022 -- 5 of 5 --
