Full Order Text
Order 1 · 27 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010064732018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: Ch/s No. 868/18 in Suit No. 42/2017. 1 Order. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 868 OF 2018 (CNR NO. MHCC01-006473-2018) IN LONG CAUSE SUIT NO. 42 OF 2017 (CNR NO. MHCC01-000054-2017) Mr. Yusuf Mohd. Naim Khan ...Plaintiff Versus Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai ...Defendant And Pratibha Manohar Parab ...Applicant CORAM : SHRI G.G.BHANSALI. (C.R.NO.11). DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2020. Mr. V.T.Dubey, Advocate for Plaintiff. Mrs. Mhatre, Advocate for Defendants / MCGM. Ms. Sayli Aapte, Advocate for Applicant. ORDER This is a chamber summons submitted by applicant Pratibha Parab, owner of C.T.S.No. 51. 2. Heard ld. Advocate Sayli Aapte for applicant. 3. Ld. Advocate V.T.Dubey for plaintiff submits that none can compel the plaintiff to litigate against unwanted defendants. -- 1 of 3 -- Ch/s No. 868/18 in Suit No. 42/2017. 2 Order. REASONS 4. Admittedly, genesis of the suit is notice dated 27/12/2016. The question for consideration is, whether presence of applicant is necessary to decide propriety of impugned notice dated 27/12/2016. 5. According to applicant, she is owner of C.T.S.No. 51 and during development of suit premises, for about 8 to 10 feet plaintiff has encroached upon open space of C.T.S.No. 51. In support of said allegation, applicant has tendered various complaints to different authorities dated 28/11/2016 and 07/03/2017. The suit property is situated on C.T.S.No. 95. The rights are accrued to plaintiff from owner Mr. Prabhakar in view of Conveyance Deed dated 20/08/2015. Applicant is failed to satisfy the Court whether C.T.S.No. 95 and 51 are closely connected; is there any measurement to show that possession of plaintiff has created any encroachment on C.T.S.No. 95 etc. If there is specific encroachment on C.T.S.No. 51, applicant is at liberty to knock the doors of the Court for appropriate relief. Considering all facts in total, I do not find necessity of applicant as proper party to decide legality of the notice dated 27/12/2016. Hence the order : - ORDER - 1. Chamber Summons No. 868/2018 stands dismissed. 2. Ch/s. No. 868/18 is disposed off accordingly. (G.G.BHANSALI) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Date : 27/02/2020. Mumbai. 1. Dictated on : 27/02/2020. 2. Transcribed on : 29/02/2020. 3. Signed on : 29/02/2020. 4. Delivered to Certified : Copy Section on -- 2 of 3 -- Ch/s No. 868/18 in Suit No. 42/2017. 3 Order. “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 29/02/2020. 5.50 p.m. Miss M.A.Kulkarni Name of the Judge (with Court Room no.) HHJ Shri G.G.Bhansali. (Court Room No.11). Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 27/02/2020. Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 29/02/2020. Judgment/Order uploaded on 29/02/2020. -- 3 of 3 --
