Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 04 Jan 2022 · CNR MHCC010064222019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 CS 1151-19 in SU No.957-2019 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT MUMBAI. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1151 OF 2019 IN L.C. SUIT NO.957 OF 2019 Sunil Jayantilal Shah and Ors. ]… Plaintiffs Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ]...Defendants AND Mr. Mahesh P. Etam ]… Respondent Adv. Jalpa Joshi for the Plaintiff Adv. Rawade for defendant No.1 and 2/MCGM. None for defendant Nos.3 to 11 CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE Shri S.D.Kulkarni (Court Room no.8) DATED : 4th January, 2022 O R A L O R D E R 1. Perused Chambers Summons, affidavit in support thereof. Heard both the advocates at length. 2. On perusal of Chamber Summons and reply filed by the defendant / MCGM and other defendants, it reveals that defendant No.3 was not added while preparing the plaint. But in plaint it is mentioned that defendant No.3 is a contractor and actually carried out the structural repair so, in the plaint the reference of defendant No.3 is mentioned but actually he was not made party while drafting the plaint. -- 1 of 3 -- 2 CS 1151-19 in SU No.957-2019 3. So in my opinion it is mistake and mistake can be cured by way of amendment. I have also perused the plaint therein it is also mentioned that defendant No.3 is a contractor and he is carried out the repair. In the plaint it is mentioned that defendant No.3 to 12 or defendant No.4 to 12. So it shows that the plaint was prepared while considering that there were 12 defendants in the suit but mistakenly defendant No.3 is not joind as defendant in the suit. 4. The basic requirement of the amendment is to cure the defect and there should be final adjudication of the matter in between the parties therefore, in my opinion Chamber Summons needs to be allowed. Considering this, I pass the following order : ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No.1151 of 2019 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Plaintiff is directed to carry out amendment within a stipulated period. 3. The amendment copy be supply to the other party. 4. Chamber Summons No.1151 of 2019 stands disposed off accordingly. (S.D.Kulkarni) Ad-hoc Judge, City Civil Court, Date : 04.01.2022 Gr. Mumbai. Dictated on : 04.01.2022 Transcribed on : 04.01.2022 Signed by HHJ on: 04.01.2022 -- 2 of 3 -- 3 CS 1151-19 in SU No.957-2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 03.00 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. J.S. Chavan Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. S.D.Kulkarni C.R. no.08 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 04.01.2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 04.01.2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 06.01.2022 -- 3 of 3 --
