Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 21 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010063242019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION N0.2289 of 2019 IN S.C.SUIT NO.4022 OF 2009 (CNR NO.MHCC010063242019) 1. Vishram Ramkrishna Shenai and Anr. )...Plaintiffs. Versus ) Ishwarsingh Chauhan )...Defendant. Appearance: Ld.Advocate Mr.Karandikar for plaintiffs. Ld.Advocate Ms.Mical for defendant. CORAM: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI R.V.KOKARE DATE :21/01/2020 (C.R.No.31) O R D E R This notice of motion is taken out by the plaintiffs for setting aside closing of the evidence of the plaintiff order passed on 23/04/2019. This notice of motion resisted on behalf of the defendant by filing reply. Read the present notice of motion, affidavit of the plaintiff in support of the notice of motion and reply of the defendant. Heard both the learned counsels on behalf of both the sides at length. Perused the record. 2. After hearing the arguments advanced on behalf of both the sides at length and scrutiny of pleadings of the present notice of motion and reply and after perusal of the record, admittedly, the evidence of the plaintiffs have been closed by this Court by order dated 23/04/2019. By way of this notice of motion, the plaintiffs requested that the plaintiff no.1 has examined himself as P.W. no.1 and examined one another witness Tukaram Raghunath Parab. The plaintiffs want to examine the -- 1 of 4 -- 2 panch witness of spot panchanama and Dr.N.D.Lad, Medical officer attached to Sion Hospital who had conducted Post Mortem of the deceased. Admittedly, the present suit came to be filed by the plaintiff for damages against the defendant. Therefore, it requires to prove on behalf of the plaintiff that the spot panchanama and post mortem conducted by the Medical Officer of Sion Hospital. 3. If the evidence closing order passed by this Court is to be set aside, an opportunity is given to the plaintiff for examining remaining witnesses i.e. panch witness of the Spot panchanama and Medical officer who has conducted the post mortem of the deceased, then it will not cause any injustice on the part of defendant. Admittedly, this notice of motion came to be filed on 25/06/2019. Whereas, evidence closing order passed on 23/04/2019. Therefore, it requires to impose costs on the plaintiff for setting aside closing evidence order passed on 23/04/2019. Therefore, I am inclined to allow this notice of motion. Hence, I proceed to pass following order. ORDER 1. Notice of motion no. 2289/19 is hereby allowed as prayed,subject to cost of Rs.1,000/( Rupees One Thousand only). 2. The plaintiff shall deposit cost amount of Rs.1,000/ to D.L.S.A., Mumbai. 3. Notice of motion no. 2289/19 is disposed off accordingly. Date : 21/01/2020 (R.V.Kokare) Judge, City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 21/01/2020 Transcribed on: 21/01/2020 Signed by HHJ: 21/01/2020 -- 2 of 4 -- 3 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGEMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 21/01/2020 Mrs. V.V.Malgaonkar Name of the Judge HHJ Shri R.V.Kokare(CR No.31) Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 21/01/2020 Judgment/order signed by P.O on 21/01/2020 Judgment/order uploaded on 21/01/2020 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 -- 4 of 4 --
