Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Messrs Maharashtra Plastic IndustriesVsMr. Pravin Bhersingh Thapa and Anr.

CNR MHCC0100624120183-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 10th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 13 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100145/2018
Registration Date
04 May 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 11-06-2018
    Business: Mrs. Kavita A. Shah, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  Notice u/o. XXI Rule 22 of CPC has already been ordered to be issued by the Hon\''ble Court.  Hence, on request of Mrs. Shah for completing service adjd to 06/07/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2018
    
    Date: 06-07-2018
    Business: Smt.Kavita Shah, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  None for Defendant.  Exe.Application marked as Exh-A (colly).  Affidavit of service Dtd.04/07/2018, tendered by Smt.Shah, taken on record and marked as Exh-B.  Defendant No.1B though served, neither appeared nor filed reply.  Hence, notice under order XXI, Rule 22 of CPC issued against Defendant No.1B is hereby made absolute.  On request of Smt.Shah, for making an application for issue of writ of possession, adjd to 24/07/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 24-07-2018
    
    Date: 24-07-2018
    Business: Ms. Kavita Shah, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  Ms. Shah files application for issuance of warrant of possession u/o.XXI Rule 35 of C.P.C., same is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.C.  Ms. Shah states that Decree sought to be executed is Consent Decree, and hence, Registrar may issue warrant as prayed for.  Upon perusing the application (Exh.C), same is allowed and warrant made returnable on 25/09/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2018
    
    Date: 25-09-2018
    Business: Ms.Pushpa Thapa, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Amendment, adjourned to 21/11/2018.  Chamber Order for amendment in Exe.Application and consequential amendment in Writ of possession and for extending the returnable date of Writ of Possession, tendered by Ms.Thapa alongwith the Affidavit is Support of the Chamber Order, taken on record and marked as Exh-D (Colly).  Additional Affidavit in Support of Exe.Application tendered by Ms.Thapa is also taken on record and marked as Exh-E.  Upon perusing the affidavits, Chamber Order is hereby signed, Exe.Application be amended and consequential amendment be carried out in Writ of possession, by extending the returnable date of Writ of Possession to 21/11/2018.  S.O. to 21/11/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 21-11-2018
    
    Date: 21-11-2018
    Business: Ms. Pushpa Thapa I/b Kavita A. Shah, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Ms. Thapa states that warrant of possession could not be executed as the Pravin Bhersingh Thapa and his wife refused to vacate the premises.  Ms. Thapa undertakes to file appropriate affidavit to that effect and seeks time for making an application for taking forcible possession.  Hence, on her request adjd to 05/12/2018.  Later on, Mr. Ramesh Chaudhary, son-in-law of Defendant No.1A, Ms. Meena Bhersingh Thapa, daughter of Defendant No.1A, and Mr. Pravin Thapa, Defendant No.1B, are present.  They are informed about the next date.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2018
    
    Date: 05-12-2018
    
    Date: 13-12-2018
    Business: Adv. Ms. Kavita Shah for DH present and filed draft chamber summons along with affidavit. She undertakes to serve the defendants. O- Leave granted to register chamber summons.
    None for JD.
    Matter adj. for CS Reply to 13.02.2019.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 13-02-2019
    
    Date: 13-02-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Kavita Shah for DH present and filed two affidavit of service in CS no. 22/2019.
    Adv. Sanjay for JD present and states that Adv. Shukla is not available.  Defendant has not filed VP. Time granted as a last chance. to take steps and file reply.
    Matter adj. for Compliance to 27.02.2019.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2019
    
    Date: 27-02-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Kavita Shah for plaintiff present.
    Defendant in person present. His advocate absent.
    Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff in CS No. 22/2019
    Matter adj. for Order in CS No. 22/2019 to 28.02.2019.
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2019
    
    Date: 28-02-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Kavita Shah for plaintiff present.
    None for defendant.
    Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff in CS  no.22/2019.
    This matter was listed yesterday for hearing in CS no.22/2019. The original defendant / JD entered his appearance through Adv. Shukla. However, VP was not filed and on 13.2.2019 time was granted as a last chance to the defendant to take steps and to file reply. Writ of possession was issued by Registrar on 3.9.2018. When the bailiff went to the suit site to execute the warrant of possession, the D-1(b) Pravin Thapa was present with his wife and children. But he refused to hand over the possession. This execution arises out of the consent terms dated 16.6.2003 filed in Suit no. 2495/1986. By the said consent terms, D-1(a) and D-1(b) were permitted to continue with the possession of suit premises during the life time of D-1(a). She expired on 12.10.2017. However, despite her death, D-1(b) has not  handed over the possession of suit premises to plaintiff.
    Yesterday, D-1(b) was present in person and he neither sought time nor made any submission. Hence the matter kept today for order in the presence of D-1(b). Today D-1(b) - Pravin Thapa is absent. None appears on his behalf.  In the facts and circumstances and in view of the consent terms, chamber summons no.22/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) at the cost of original plaintiff.  Place the matter for Compliance and Report to 25.03.2019.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2019
    
    Date: 25-03-2019
    Business: None for DH.
    None for JD.
    Await report.
    Matter adj. for Compliance and Report to 17.06.2019.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019
    
    Date: 17-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Kavita Shah for Decree Holder present.
    None present of JD.
    The Ld. counsel for DH submitted that CS no. 22/19 was allowed and DH was permitted to take forcible possession. However orders passed in CS could not be executed during summer vacation, now it is rainy season she prayed for extension of time for execution as per order of CS no. 22/19. Time extended.
    Matter stands Adj for Compliance to 18.10.19.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2019
    
    Date: 18-10-2019
    Business: Adv. Kavita Shah for plaintiff/ DH present.
    None present for the defendant/JD.
    Heard Ld. Counsel for the DH.
    She submitted that due to rainy season case could not be taken for execution of possession warrant with police aid.
    Hence, she prayed for grant of extension of 12 weeks time to get the warrant executed.
    Extension granted as prayed.
    Matter stands adj for Return of warrant to 10.01.2020
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2020
    
    Date: 10-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Pushpa Thapa for DH present and submitted true copy of report of execution and possession warrant issued by this court, including receipt of possession by the CA of plaintiff/DH.
    True copy of report of execution and possession warrant issued by this court. Seen and filed.
    None present for JD present.
    Heard Ld. counsel for DH/plaintiff. She submitted that now nothing remains in execution proceedings, as possession as prayed is taken by the plaintiff as per report of execution of possession warrant.
    In view of the above, the Execution application is disposed of as fully satisfied.
    Later on
    Daughter of defendant no. 1(a) present.
    Defendant no. 1 (b) present in person.
    The defendants submitted that due to the execution of possession warrant, they have become homeless. They are advised to take legal assistance from their advocate.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 10-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100256/2018
    Filing Date: 04-05-2018
    First Hearing Date: 11th June 2018
    Decision Date: 10th January 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    10 Jan 2020
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: NOTING 10.01.2020 : 1 : C.R.NO.03
    10.01.2020
    73
    CORAM : HIS HONOR JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT
    SHRI. V.V. VIDWANS (Court Room No. 03)
    EA 145/18
    Ex-2
    Adv. Pushpa Thapa for DH present and submitted true copy of
    report of execution and possession warrant issued by this court,
    including receipt of possession by the CA of plaintiff/DH.
    True copy of report of execution and possession warrant issued by
    this court. Seen and filed.
    None present for JD present.
    Heard Ld. counsel for DH/plaintiff. She submitted that now
    nothing remains in execution proceedings, as possession as
    prayed is taken by the plaintiff as per report of execution of
    possession warrant.
    In view of the above, the Execution application is disposed of as
    fully satisfied.
    Later on
    Daughter of defendant no. 1(a) present.
    Defendant no. 1 (b) present in person.
    The defendants submitted that due to the execution of possession
    warrant, they have become homeless. They are advised to take
    legal assistance from their advocate.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    10 Jan 2020
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: NOTING 10.01.2020 : 1 : C.R.NO.03
    10.01.2020
    73
    CORAM : HIS HONOR JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT
    SHRI. V.V. VIDWANS (Court Room No. 03)
    EA 145/18
    Ex-2
    Adv. Pushpa Thapa for DH present and submitted true copy of
    report of execution and possession warrant issued by this court,
    including receipt of possession by the CA of plaintiff/DH.
    True copy of report of execution and possession warrant issued by
    this court. Seen and filed.
    None present for JD present.
    Heard Ld. counsel for DH/plaintiff. She submitted that now
    nothing remains in execution proceedings, as possession as
    prayed is taken by the plaintiff as per report of execution of
    possession warrant.
    In view of the above, the Execution application is disposed of as
    fully satisfied.
    Later on
    Daughter of defendant no. 1(a) present.
    Defendant no. 1 (b) present in person.
    The defendants submitted that due to the execution of possession
    warrant, they have become homeless. They are advised to take
    legal assistance from their advocate.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.