Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Jagjeet Singh VijanVsBMC M West Ward

CNR MHCC0100622220198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 08th July 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102263/2019
Registration Date
21 Jun 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Jagjeet Singh Vijan

    Respondent

    1. 1BMC M West Ward

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-06-2019
Business: Adv. Subhash Vasave for plaintiff present and tendered registered NM No. 2263/19 along with affidavit.
Adv. Mrs. Hajare h/f Adv. Khandagle for Deft./MCGM present.
On oral request of ld adv for def., adjournment granted.
Adjd to 08.07.2019 for NM reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2019

Date: 08-07-2019
Business: Adv. Pooja Mungekar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present.
Kept back
Order on NM no. 2263/19.
By instant NM the plaintiff has prayed to allow him to lead secondary evidence for the receipt dtd. 15.01.2007.  In the case of Karthik Gangadhar Bhat vs. Smt. Nirmala Namdeo Wagh and Ors. (Writ Petition No. 11151/2017, Judgment dtd. 03.11.2017) Hon\\\''ble Bombay High Court has laid down that application for leading secondary evidence is not required.  In view of the above principle NM is disposed off as redundant.  The plaintiff may always place before this Court secondary evidence as contemplated by Indian Evidence Act.
Adjd to 29.07.2019 for cross examination of Pw 1.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 08-07-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 106571/2019
Filing Date: 21-06-2019
First Hearing Date: 25th June 2019
Decision Date: 08th July 2019
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    08 Jul 2019
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: Dt.08/07/2019
SU 1567/12
CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. C. V. MARATHE (C.R.NO.08)
Adv. Pooja Mungekar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present.
Kept back
Order on NM no. 2263/19.
By instant NM the plaintiff has prayed to allow him to lead
secondary evidence for the receipt dtd. 15.01.2007. In the
case of Karthik Gangadhar Bhat vs. Smt. Nirmala Namdeo
Wagh and Ors. [Writ Petition No. 11151/2017, Judgment dtd.
03.11.2017] Hon'ble Bombay High Court has laid down that
application for leading secondary evidence is not required. In
view of the above principle NM is disposed off as redundant.
The plaintiff may always place before this Court secondary
evidence as contemplated by Indian Evidence Act.
Adjd to 29.07.2019 for cross examination of Pw 1.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.