Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 30 Jul 2019 · CNR MHCC010062052018
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT NO.659/2018 1 Received on : 05052018 Registered on : 22062018 Decided on : 30072019 Duration : 01Y 02M 27D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 659 0f 2018 (CNR NO.: MHCC010062052018) SATYEN POLYMERS PVT.LTD.,a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 307, A to Z Industrial Premises, G.K.Marg,Lower Parel, Mumbai400013. ...Plaintiff Versus BASANT KUMAR SHARMA Age not known Proprietor of M/s.Fiber Glass Poly Products, having his address at Additional Ambernath, M.I.D.C.Anand Nagar, Behind B21, Near Durga Weigh Bridge, Ambernath(East), and Lodha Regency, H305, Sandap Manpada, Dombivali(East), Thane 421204. ...Defendant Appearances: Advocate Ms.Nisha Shah for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 30TH JULY 2019 -- 1 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.659/2018 2 J U D G M E N T This is a suit for recovery of Rs.4,64,511/(Rupees Four Lacs Sixty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Eleven only). 2. Plaintiff case in nut shell is that plaintiff is a private company and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling inter alia, unsaturated Polyester resins, gelcoats, adhesives and performance coatings. Since about more than five years plaintiff is supplying to defendants various goods on basis of purchase order placed by defendant. From time to time plaintiff has supplied various goods and defendant is in default of Rs.4,64,511/(Rupees Four Lacs Sixty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Eleven only).Hence, t his suit. 3. The defendant was served with summons for appearance but he remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against him. 4. From the material on record following points come for my determination and my findings with reasons are as follows: POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff proves that from time to time he has supplied goods to the defendant? Yes 2. Whether plaintiff proves that amount of Rs.4,64,511/(Rupees Four Lacs Sixty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Eleven only) is due and recoverable from defendant? Yes -- 2 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.659/2018 3 3. Whether plaintiff is entitled for recovery of Rs.4,64,511/(Rupees Four Lacs Sixty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Eleven only) along with interest as claimed? Yes 4. What order and decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4. 5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To prove its case plaintiff examined Shri.Sumeet Gholap, Authorized representative vide Exh.6 and filed certified copy of resolution Exh.8, copies of invoices Exh.9 to Exh.13, original cheque Exh.14, bank return memo Exh.15, advocate demand notice Exh.16, postal acknowledgement Exh.17 and balance confirmation letter Exh.18. 6. Heard Ld.counsel for plaintiff. 7. Affidavit is supported by documents. The copies of invoices Exh.9 to Exh.13, original cheque Exh.14, bank return memo Exh.15, advocate demand notice Exh.16, postal acknowledgement Exh.17 and balance confirmation letter Exh.18 shows that plaintiff is a private company and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling inter alia, unsaturated Polyester resins, gelcoats, adhesives and performance coatings. Since about more than five years plaintiff is supplying to defendants various goods on basis of purchase order placed by defendant. From time to time plaintiff has supplied various goods and defendant is in default of Rs.4,64,511/(Rupees Four Lacs Sixty Four -- 3 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.659/2018 4 Thousand Five Hundred and Eleven only). As far as rate of interest is concerned, plaintiff has prayed for interest @ 18% p.a. Such rate of interest is mentioned in invoices and therefore, it can be granted. Accordingly, point No.1 to 3 answered as 'Yes' and following order is passed. ORDER 1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs. 2. Defendant do pay to plaintiff a sum of Rs.4,64,511/(Rupees Four Lacs Sixty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Eleven only) along with interest @ of 18%p.a.from the date of filing of the suit till full and final realization. 3. Court fee be refunded as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (M.S.LONE) Judge, Date:30/07/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 30/07/2019 Transcribed on : 01/08/2019 Signed on : 01/08/2019 -- 4 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.659/2018 5 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 02/08/2019 at 10.40p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 30/07/2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 01/08/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 02/08/2019 -- 5 of 5 --
