Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Saad Abdul Qayyum GazdherVsDesignated Officer +1 more

CNR MHCC0100619120195-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 06th July 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101493/2019
Registration Date
21 Jun 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 37 and 38

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 21-06-2019
    Business: BY PRECIPEE
    Plaintiff present.
    Adv.Mr.P.D.Gandhy for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Smita Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM present.
    Adv.of Plaintiff filed draft notice of motion a/w. Affidavit t.o.r.
    O-Leave granted to register draft notice of motion.
    Mr.Vinod Ghane, Sub Engineer, B and F Department, \''A\'' Ward.
    Exh.1-Plaint
    Exh.2-Vakalatnama. O-Seen and filed.
    Exh.3-Address Memo. O-R and R.
    Exh.4-List of documents. O-Seen and filed.
    Exh.5-Affidavit in support of plaint.
    Exh.6-Adv.of BMC/Deft. Filed list of documents t.o.r.
    Heard Ld.Adv.for Plaintiff and Ld.Adv of Deft.
          The Ld.Adv.for Plaintiff argued that the sanctioned plan which was not within his reach at the time of filing reply to the notice U/S.351 was traced after the order who was passed by the corporation pursuant to the notice. He relies on other documents also. One of the prayer in the notice of motion is for remand of the matter back to the corporation for fresh appraisal.
                    Admittedly the notice is u/S.351 of MMC Act. It would be appropriate to direct the corporation to file say to the  notice of motion. In the meantime, the defendant is directed not to take coercive action by virtue of the order dated 15.06.2019. It is made clear that the interim order passed today is not on merits. It is only to maintain the suit property in status-quo till filing of reply and argument on notice of motion.
    Matter adjd to 28.06.2019 for NM Reply/NM Argument.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2019
    
    Date: 28-06-2019
    Business: Adv.Hardik Desai for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Smita Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM present.
    Adv.of Plaintiff filed NM No.2337/19 a/w. Affidavit t.o.r.
    Reply filed by Adv.of BMC t.o.r.
    Earlier order if any to continue till the next date.
    Matter adjd to 01.07.2019 for NM Argument.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2019
    
    Date: 01-07-2019
    Business: Adv.Indira Bhushan for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Smita Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM present.
    KB
    LO
    Adv.Mithilesh Mishra for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Smita Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM present.
    KB
    LO
    Adv.Hardik Desai for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Smita Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM present.
    Heard.
    Matter adjd to 03.07.2019 for NM Order.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2019
    
    Date: 03-07-2019
    Business: Adv.Indira Bhushan for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Smita Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM present.
    (As Court is busy in other matters hence, adjourned.)
    Earlier order if any to continue till the next date.
    Matter adjd to 06.07.2019 for NM Order.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2019
    
    Date: 06-07-2019
    Business: Adv.Indira Bhushan for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Rawade for defendant/MCGM present.
    F.R.S.R. the following order is passed
                          ORDER
    1. The defendant corporation to consider the reply dated 20.06.2019 as reply to the notice dated 08.02.2019 under Section 351 of the MMC Act, a fresh and pass speaking order.
    2. The Plaintiff to approach the corporation within two weeks from the date of order and the corporation to hear and pass speaking orders within three weeks thereafter.
    3. In case of adverse orders against the Plaintiff, no coercive action should be taken out against the Plaintiff for 10 days from the date of order.
    4. In the light of above directions notice of motion and suit stands disposed off.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 06-07-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 106705/2019
    Filing Date: 20-06-2019
    First Hearing Date: 21st June 2019
    Decision Date: 06th July 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 5-COURT 05  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    06 Jul 2019
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :SUIT/0101493/2019
    Saad Abdul Qayyum Gazdher Vs Designated Officer
    Date : 06-07-2019
    Business : Adv.Indira Bhushan for plaintiff present. Adv.Smt.Rawade
    for defendant/MCGM present. F.R.S.R. the following order
    is passed ORDER 1. The defendant corporation to consider
    the reply dated 20.06.2019 as reply to the notice dated
    08.02.2019 under Section 351 of the MMC Act, a fresh and
    pass speaking order. 2. The Plaintiff to approach the
    corporation within two weeks from the date of order and the
    corporation to hear and pass speaking orders within three
    weeks thereafter. 3. In case of adverse orders against the
    Plaintiff, no coercive action should be taken out against the
    Plaintiff for 10 days from the date of order. 4. In the light of
    above directions notice of motion and suit stands disposed
    off.
    Nature of Disposal : OTHER
    Disposal Date : 06-07-2019
    COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.