Full Order Text
Order 1 · 04 May 2019 · CNR MHCC010061642018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.708/2018 Received on : 05.05.2018 Registered on : 12.07.2018 Decided on : 04.05.2019 Duration : Y M D 01 00 01 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 708 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010061642018 SANJESH CHUNINAL JAIN Aged 45 years of Mumbai, an adult Indian inhabitant, having his address at Room No.70, 2nd floor, Swadheshi Market, Kalbadevi Road, Mumbai – 400 002. ...Plaintiff. Versus DAYASHANKAR H. PATHAK Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant Working for gain with National Bank for Agriculture And Rural Development (NABARD) Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai – 400 051 And residing at Damodat Park, A/5/14, 4th Floor Ghatkopar (West), Mumbai. ...Defendant. Appearances: Advocate Mr. Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendant Exparte. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 4th MAY, 2019. -- 1 of 6 -- :2: Summary Suit No.708/2018 [ J U D G M E N T ] Story of plaintiff in short is as under : 1. Plaintiff has stated that for valuable consideration of Rs.75,000/ the defendant received from him and towards discharge of the defendant liability towards him, drew and delivered a Cheque dated 24th January 2017 bearing No.987400 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jash Chambers, Sir P.M. Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001, for Rs.75,000/ in his favour. 2. Plaintiff has further stated that the said cheque on being presented to the Bank has been dishonoured vide a memo of dishonour dated 15th February 2017 with the Remark “Account Dormant”. Plaintiff has further stated that by virtue of dishonour of he said cheque and pursuant to the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, he has become entitled to and the defendant has become liable to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the sum of the said cheque from the date of dishonour. 3. Plaintiff has further stated that he by his Advocate''s letter dated 14th April 2018 recorded, inter alia, the above facts and called upon the defendant to pay the said sum of Rs.75,000/ and accrued interest. The defendant has duly received the said letter. The defendant has failed and avoided to comply with the requisitions thereof and have also controverted the contents of the said letter. Plaintiff has further stated that in the premises, there is now due and payable by the defendant to him a sum of Rs.91,273.97ps. in accordance with the particulars of his claim. 4. Defendant failed to appear in the suit, therefore, suit has -- 2 of 6 -- :3: Summary Suit No.708/2018 proceeded exparte against him. 5. Heard the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. 6. Following points arise for determination and their findings followed by reasons are as stated below: Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to get amount of Rs.91,273.97ps. from defendant alongwith interest @ 18% p. a. on the sum of Rs.75,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation ? ...Partly in the affirmative. 2. What order and Decree ? ...As per final order REASONS 7. Plaintiff relied upon the following documents as documentary evidence which are as under : Sr. No. Exhibits Particulars 1. Exh.9 Cheque dated 24th January 2017 2. Exh.10 Memo of Dishonour dated 15th February 2017 3. Exh.11 The Plaintiff's Advocates' letter dated 14th April 2018 alongwith the postal records in connection therewith. AS TO POINT NOS. 1 AND 2: 8. Plaintiff has filed evidence of himself in the form of affidavit below Exh.7 and stated that for valuable consideration and towards discharge of the liability the defendant delivered a post dated cheque dated 24th January 2017 bearing No.987400 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Jash Chambers, Sir P.M. Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001, for Rs.75,000/ in his favour for valuable consideration sum of Rs.75,000/ -- 3 of 6 -- :4: Summary Suit No.708/2018 received by the defendant. He has further stated that the said cheque on being presented to the Bank has been dishonoured vide a memo of dishonour dated 15th February 2017. Plaintiff has further stated that he from time to time demanded from the defendant the said amount of Rs.75,000/ and interest accrued thereon @ 18% per annum. The defendant, however, failed and neglected to pay the said sum and any part thereof and kept him on false and baseless promises. 9. Plaintiff has further stated that he repeatedly called upon the defendant to pay the amount of Rs.75,000/ with interest due. The defendant failed and neglected to pay the same and any part thereof. Plaintiff has further stated that on 14th April 2018, he forwarded a Demand Notice through his Advocates to the defendant. The said Demand Notice was duly served upon the defendant. The defendant has not disputed the contents of the said Notice and not forwarded any reply thereto. Plaintiff has further stated that in the above circumstances he filed the present suit for Rs.91,273.97ps. and further interest on Rs.75,000/ at the rate of 18% per annum from filing of suit till payment and costs. 10. Plaintiff has adduced Original Cheque, Memo of Dishonour and the plaintiff's Advocates' letter alongwith the postal records on record as documentary evidence. The oral evidence of plaintiff is corroborated by documentary evidence. Defendant has failed to challenge all the allegations in the plaint and evidence of plaintiff. Therefore, plaintiff has proved that he is entitled to get sum of Rs.91,273.97ps. from defendant. 11. It appears that as per Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, -- 4 of 6 -- :5: Summary Suit No.708/2018 it will be proper to direct defendant to give interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.75,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. Hence, answer point No.1 partly in the affirmative and pass following Order: ORDER 1. Suit is partly decreed with cost. 2. Defendant is directed to pay sum of Rs.91,273.97ps. to plaintiff along with interest @ 9% p.a. on the sum of Rs.75,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee be refunded as per rules. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 04.05.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 04.05.2019 Transcribed on : 04.05.2019 Signed on : 04.05.2019 -- 5 of 6 -- :6: Summary Suit No.708/2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 10.06.2019 At 12:45 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 04.05.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 04.05.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 10.06.2019 -- 6 of 6 --
