Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Abhay Narendra Lodha Suit St.No. 6481 of 2019VsOriental Bank of Commerce and Anr.

CNR MHCC01006162201931-COURT 31 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 04th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102246/2019
Registration Date
20 Jun 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Sarita Vishwakarma for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ms. Sheetal Chaturvedi for defendant no.1 present, submits V/P of MDP partners vide Exh.2.
    Adv. Mr. Rohit Kanmurde for defendant no.2 present, submitted V/P of Anup Khetan and Co. vide Exh.3.
    Registered NM No.2246/19 tendered by adv. Ms. Vishwakarma for plff.
    Ld adv. for bank prayed for one month adjournment.  It is strongly objected by adv. for plff. Next date 09.07.2019 is given, defts to file reply positively on 09.07.2019.
    Matter is adjd. for NM reply on 09.07.2019.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2019
    
    Date: 09-07-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Bobade a/w Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ms. Sheetal Chaturvedi for defendant present.
    Reply to NM no.2246/19 filed by deft.
    Copy served to plff.
    Matter is adjd. for NM argument on 24.07.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 24-07-2019
    
    Date: 24-07-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Bobade a/w adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mr. Prakash Shinde for defendant present.
    Both side arguments are partly conducted.
    Matter is adjd. for argument on 25.07.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2019
    
    Date: 25-07-2019
    Business: Adv. Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mr. Prakash Shinde for defendant present.
    Argued partly and prayed for adjd. r/o. 29.07.2019.
    Matter is adjd. for argument on 29.07.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2019
    
    Date: 29-07-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Babade and a/w Adv. Ms. Prinyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mr. Prakash Shinde for defendant present.
    Part arguments of adv. Mr. Shinde for defendant bank are heard.
    Matter is adjd. for NM argument on 01.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2019
    
    Date: 01-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mr. Prakash Shinde for defendant no.1 present.
    Argument of Adv. Mr. Shinde is completed.
    Matter is adjd. for reply by plff. on 02.08.2019 at 3.30
    p.m.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2019
    
    Date: 02-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Bobade a/w adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present, heard reply.
    None for defendant present.
    Adjd for rejoinder by defendant bank.
    Matter is adjd. for rejoinder on 05.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: REJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2019
    
    Date: 05-08-2019
    Business: Court is on Judicial Training
    Next Purpose: REJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2019
    
    Date: 19-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff, submits that argument are over on both side.
    Adv. Ms. Niyati Marchant for defendant no.1 present, submits that arguments were completed on last date.
    Matter is adjd. for order on 21.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2019
    
    Date: 21-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Bobade a/w adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mr. Prakash Shinde for defendant bank present.
    It is shown for order.
    However, arguments in Suit no. 2078/19 are yet to complete.  Both suit are having similar question involved.  Hence, roznama be shown as posted for argument.
    Matter is adjd. for NM argument on 27.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2019
    
    Date: 27-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Bobade a/w adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mr. Prakash Shinde for defendant present.
    Matter is adjd. for argument in Reply on 31.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 31-08-2019
    
    Date: 31-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dubey for plaintiff present.
    None for defendant present.
    Heard argument and reply of ld adv. Ms. Dubey for plff. As adv. Mr. Shinde for deft bank is absent, adjd for rejoinder reply of bank, if any.
    Matter is adjd. for rejoinder reply on 07.09.2019.
    Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2019
    
    Date: 07-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Priyanka Dubey for Plff.
    Adv. Prakash Shinde for Deft. Bank, submitted reply.
    Matter is adjd. for submission of case-laws on
    17.09.2019.
    Next Purpose: CIATATION
    Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2019
    
    Date: 17-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dube for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ms. Niyati Marchand for defendant present.
    Citation filed by plff. Argument of both side are completed.
    Matter is adjd. for NM order on 27.09.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 27-09-2019
    
    Date: 27-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dubey for plaintiff, requested for status-quo order as matter is finally heard by this court and awaiting order.  It is experience of plff that as petition is filed, the banks had declared the account of plff as fraud.
    Adv. Ms. Niyati Marchand for defendant, resisted for order of status-quo as there are holidays in next week and matter is reserved for order.
    However, ld adv. for deft is not ready to file pursis.  In respect of maintaining status-quo.  In present case both side has argued at length in various sittings, there is bulky record, today due to heavy board.  It is not possible to proceed for order.  Hence, parties to maintain status-quo.  It is made clear no further action in view of master circular be obtain against plff. till further order as matter is reserved for order r/o. 04.10.2019.
    Matter is adjd. for order on NM on 04.10.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 04-10-2019
    
    Date: 04-10-2019
    Business: - ORDER - 1.The Notice of Motion no. 2246 of 2019 is allowed, as per prayer clause a and b.
    2 Defendant bank, personally or through representative are restrained from taking coercive action against plaintiff on account of red flag or fraud account, based on master circular. Defendant or their representative are restrained from branding the plaintiff as willfull defaulter and publishing the name of plaintiff as defaulter, till further order. 3.Defendant may submit written statement in detail to expedite hearing. 4.It is made clear that defendant bank may continue with proceeding under SARFAESI Act, recovery proceeding, attachment and sale of attached property to recover the defaulted loan against plaintiff. 5.Notice of Motion no. 2246 of 2019 is disposed of accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 04-10-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 106710/2019
    Filing Date: 20-06-2019
    First Hearing Date: 25th June 2019
    Decision Date: 04th October 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 31-COURT 31  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    04 Oct 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: N/m No. 2246/19 in Suit No. 2077/19. 1 Order. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2246 OF 2019 (CNR NO. MHCC010061622019) IN SUIT NO. 2077 OF 2019 (CNR NO. MHCC010059672019) Abhay Narendra Lodha ...Plaintiff Versus Oriental Bank of Commerce & Another ...Defendants CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI G.G.BHANSALI. (C.R.NO.31). DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2019. Mr. Bobde a/w Ms. Priyanka Dubey, Advocate for Plaintiff. Mr. Prakash Shinde…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.