Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 24 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010061432018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT NO.691/2018 1 Received on : 04-05-2018 Registered on : 05-07-2018 Decided on : 24-02-2020 Duration : 01Y 09M 22D IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 691 OF 2018 (UNDER ORDER XXXVII THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908) ( CNR NO.: MHCC01-006143-2018) Manoj Dhondiba Magdum, Age: 37 years, Residing at Laxmi Niwas, New Mill Road, Kurla(West), Mumbai-400 070. ....Plaintiff Versus Ramsajivan Bhagvatprasad Gupta Age: Adult, Residing at Room No.407, A-Wing, 4th floor, Jankalyan Society, Omkar Building, Match Factory Road, Kurla(West), Mumbai-400 070. ...Defendant Appearances:- Advocate Mr.Vasant Bansode for the Plaintiff. Defendant Ex-parte. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT (C.R.NO.28) DATE : 24th FEBRUARY 2020 J U D G M E N T 1. This is Summary Suit for recovery of amount of Rs.10,40,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Forty Thousand Only) with pendente lite and future interest. -- 1 of 4 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.691/2018 2 2. According to the plaintiff, on the request of defendant on 10.05.2012, he paid Rs.7,00,000/- to the defendant as a loan repayable with interest at the rate of 1.5% per month (18% p.a.). The defendant executed a promissory note dtd.10.05.2012 for Rs.7,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 1.50% p.m. in favour of the plaintiff. However, the defendant paid Rs.2,00,000/- only in cash as a part-payment to the plaintiff in several installments from December 2014 to January 2016. The defendant also admitted payment of said amount in a statement recorded by police on 08.09.2016. Still the defendant did not pay the remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- to the plaintiff. Despite legal notice of demand dated 12.11.2016, the defendant failed to pay the said amount. At the institution of the suit the amount due and payable by the defendant was Rs.10,40,000/-. Therefore, the plaintiff claimed decree for recovery of said amount with pendente lite and future interest. 3. Despite service of summons the defendant failed to appear. Therefore, the suit proceeded ex-parte against the Defendant. 4. Considering the material on record and submissions made on behalf of the plaintiff points arise for determination along with my findings thereon for the reasons recorded are as under:- POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of amount as prayed? Yes 2. At what pendente lite and future interest ? At the rate of 7% p.a. 3. What order and decree? As per final order -- 2 of 4 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.691/2018 3 REASONS AS TO POINTS NO.1 to 3 :- 5. The plaintiff filed his Evidence Affidavit at Exh.6 and also produced documents with list Exh.7. The Affidavit and the document as promissory note dtd.10.05.2012 reveal that the defendant executed said promissory note for Rs.7,00,000/- in favour of the plaintiff. The Promissory Note mentions about interest at the rate of 1.50 % p.m.. Despite legal notice dtd.12.11.2016, the defendant failed to pay the amount to the plaintiff. Thus, the Evidence Affidavit, documents on record and the circumstance that defendant failed to appear and contest/challenge the suit, prove that the defendant executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff by obtaining loan of Rs.7,00,000/-. As regards the limitation, though the promissory note was executed on 10.05.2012,it is specific contention of the plaintiff in the plaint that since Dec 2014 to June 2016 in several parts the defendant has made payment of total Rs.2,00,000/-. The same contention is Un-rebutted. Since, Dec 2014, the defendant has been making the part payment in cash. The part-payment has been made lastly in June 2016. Therefore the suit is within limitation. Considering all these circumstances the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount. Hence, point No.1 is answered in the Affirmative. However, as regards pendente lite and future interest considering overall circumstances it is just and proper to grant interest at the rate of 7% p.a.. Hence, point No.2 is answered as that the plaintiff is entitled to pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 7% p.a.. In view of Para- 499 of Civil Manual Court fees has to be refunded to the plaintiff, this being summary suit where the defendant did not appear. In answer to -- 3 of 4 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.691/2018 4 point No.3 order as follows is passed:- ORDER 1. The suit is ex-parte decreed with costs as under. 2. The Defendant shall pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs.10,40,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Forty Thousand Only) with simple interest at the rate of 7% p.a. on the principal amount of Rs.5,00,000 from the date of suit till realization of the amount. 3. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (Deepak L. Bhagwat) Ad-Hoc Judge, Date: 24/02/2020 City Civil Court,Gr. Mumbai Dictated on : 24/02/2020 Signed on : 26/02/2020 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 27/02/2019 at 2.20p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.D.L.Bhagwat (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 24/02/2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 26/02/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 27/02/2019 -- 4 of 4 --
