Full Order Text
Order 1 · 29 Jun 2019 · CNR MHCC010061192018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.911/2018 Received on : 04.05.2018 Registered on : 01.09.2018 Decided on : 29.06.2019 Duration : Y M D 01 01 27 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 911 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010061192018 M/S. OTARMAL KANTILAL & CO. a Registered Partnership Firm carrying on business at Shop No.8, Kalyan Building No.2, Sadashiv Cross Lane, Kandewadi, Bombay – 400 004 through its Partner Mr. Parasmal Otarmal Jain, Aged about 64 years ...Plaintiff V/S. 1. MEENA MAHADEO SHINDE (Age not known) an adult Indian Inhabitant, working for gain with Central Railway at Nirmal Park, Byculla, Mumbai – 400 007 and residing at Building No.1R/B/100, Room No.1, Railway Colony, Kurla (East), Mumbai. 2. PRAMOD KESHAV PEDNEKAR (Age not known) an adult Indian Inhabitant, working for gain with Reserve Bank of India P & S.E. Department, Main Building, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 and -- 1 of 6 -- :2: Summary Suit No.911/2018 residing at 4/135, Shiv Krupa, N.M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400 013. ...Defendants. Appearances: Advocate Mr. Dileep Satale for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 29th JUNE, 2019. [ J U D G M E N T ] Story of plaintiff in short is as under : 1. Plaintiff has stated that on 8th May 2015, defendant No.1 for valuable consideration viz. a sum of Rs.40,000/ received from him, drew a Bill of Exchange directing thereby defendant No.2 to pay to him or Order at Bombay, a sum of Rs.40,000/ on demand. The said Bill of Exchange was accepted by defendant No.2 and delivered to him on the same day. 2. Plaintiff has further stated that on 8th June 2015 he presented the suit Bill of Exchange to defendant No.2 and demanded the amount due thereunder. Defendant No.2 dishonoured the same by non payment. Plaintiff has further stated that he thereupon immediately, informed defendant No.1 about the dishonour of the suit Bill of Exchange and demanded form defendant No.1 the said amount of Rs.40,000/. Defendant No.1 also failed and neglected to pay the said amount or any part thereof. Plaintiff has further stated that pursuant to the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act and on account of dishonour of the suit Bill of Exchange, he has become entitled to and the defendants have, jointly and severally, become liable to pay the said amount of Rs.40,000/ and interest thereon at the rate of 18% per -- 2 of 6 -- :3: Summary Suit No.911/2018 annum from the date of dishonour till payment. Therefore, plaintiff field the suit. 3. Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 failed to appear in the suit, therefore, suit has proceeded exparte against them. 4. Heard the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. 5. Following points arise for determination and their findings followed by reasons are as stated below: Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to get sum of Rs.60,752/ from defendant Nos. 1 and 2 jointly and severally alongwith interest @ 18% p. a. on the sum of Rs.40,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation ? ...Partly in the affirmative. 2. What order and Decree ? ...As per final order REASONS 6. Plaintiff relied upon the following documents as documentary evidence which are as under : Sr. No. Exhibits Particulars 1. Exh.8 Extract of the Registration of the plaintiff's Firm with the Registrar of Firm. 2. Exh.9 Bill of Exchange dated 8th May 2015. 3. Exh.10 The Plaintiff's Advocates' letter dated 6th December 2017, alongwith the Courier records in respect thereof. AS TO POINT NOS. 1 AND 2: 7. Plaintiff has filed evidence of Parasmal Otarmal Jain (P.W.1), a -- 3 of 6 -- :4: Summary Suit No.911/2018 partner of the plaintiff in the form of affidavit below Exh.6 and he has stated in his evidence that plaintiff have filed the above suit against the defendants above named for recovery of a sum of Rs.60,752/ and for further interest @ 18% p.a. or at such further rate of interest on the principal amount of Rs.40,000/ from filing of the suit till realisation and costs of the Suit in respect of the Bill of Exchange dated 8th May 2015. The said Bill of Exchange was executed by defendant No.1 and has been accepted by defendant No.2. 8. Plaintiff has adduced Extract of the Registration of the Plaintiff's Firm with the Registrar of Firm, Bill of Exchange and Advocate's letter alongwith the Courier records in respect thereof on record as documentary evidence. The oral evidence of plaintiff is corroborated by documentary evidence. Defendants have failed to challenge all the allegations in the plaint and evidence of plaintiff. Therefore, plaintiff has proved that it is entitled to get sum of Rs.60,752/ from defendant Nos. 1 and 2 jointly and severally. 9. It appears that as per Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it will be proper to direct defendants to give interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.40,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. Hence, answer point No.1 partly in the affirmative and pass following Order: ORDER 1. Suit is partly decreed with cost. 2. Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to pay sum of Rs.60,752/ to plaintiff along with interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.40,000/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. -- 4 of 6 -- :5: Summary Suit No.911/2018 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee be refunded as per rules. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 29.06.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 29.06.2019 Transcribed on : 29.06.2019 Signed on : 29.06.2019 -- 5 of 6 -- :6: Summary Suit No.911/2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 22.07.2019 At 01:33 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 29.06.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 29.06.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 22.07.2019 -- 6 of 6 --
