Full Order Text
Order 1 · 09 Jul 2019 · CNR MHCC010061182018
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT 910/2018 1 Received on : 04052018 Registered on : 01092018 Decided on : 09072019 Duration : 01Y 02M 19D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 910 OF 2018 (UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908) CNR NO.: MHCC010061182018 M/s.Otarmal Kantilal & Co. a Registered Partnership firm carrying on business at Shop No.8, Kalyan Building, No.2, Sadashiv Cross Lane, Kandewadi Bombay400 004 through its Partner Mr.Parasmal Otarmal Jain, Age about 64 years ...Plaintiff Versus 1. Dayanand Sopana Hinge (Age not known) an adult Indian Inhabitant, working for gain with BEST Bus Depot, Payment Slip No.35/06, Kurla (West), Mumbai400 067 and residing at Shantikunj Coop.Hsg.Society Room No.F304, Plot No.14, Sector No.4, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai410 210. 2. Prakash Vishnu Bhise an adult Indian Inhabitant, working for gain with BEST Bus Depot, Bus Conductor No.187454, Payment Slip No.35/18, Dharavi, Mumbai400 017 and residing at Building -- 1 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT 910/2018 2 No.18A, Room No.1, Chandivali MHADA Colony, Andheri, Mumbai400 072. ….Defendants Appearances: Advocate Ms.Divya Jain & Mr.Dileep Satale for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 9TH JULY 2019 J U D G M E N T This is a suit for recovery of Rs.29,922/(Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Two only). 2. The plaintiff case in nut shell is that on24/06/2015 defendant No.1 for valuable consideration of Rs. 20,000/ drew a bill of exchange directing defendant No.2 to pay plaintiff the said amount. Defendant No.2 accepted and delivered the said bill of exchange to plaintiff. Inspite of demand the defendants did not honoured bill of exchange. Defendants are in default of Rs.29,922/(Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Two only). Hence, this suit. 3. The defendants were served with summons for appearance but they remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against them. 4. From the material on record following points come for my determination and my findings with reasons are as follows: -- 2 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT 910/2018 3 POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the plaintiff proves that defendants executed bill of exchange for valuable consideration of Rs.20,000/? Yes 2. Whether the plaintiff proves that amount of Rs.29,922/(Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Two only) is due and recoverable from defendant? Yes 3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of Rs.29,922/ (Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Two only)along with interest as claimed? Yes 4. What order and decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINT NO.1 TO 4. 5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To prove its case plaintiff examined Parasmal Otarmal Jain Exh.6 and filed original bill of exchange and advocate demand notice. 6. Heard Ld.counsel for plaintiff. 7. The oral evidence has gone unchallenged. The bill of exchange and advocate demand notice shows that on 24/06/2015 defendant No.1 for valuable consideration of Rs. 20,000/ drew a bill of exchange -- 3 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT 910/2018 4 directing defendant No.2 to pay plaintiff the said amount. Defendant No.2 accepted and delivered the said bill of exchange to plaintiff. Inspite of demand the defendants did not honoured bill of exchange. Defendants are in default of Rs.29,922/(Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Two only). As far as rate of interest is concerned, the plaintiff has claimed interest @ 18% p.a. as per section 80 of N.I.Act such rate of interest can be granted . Therefore, point No.1 to 3 is answered as Yes and following order is passed. ORDER 1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs. 2. Defendants do jointly and severally pay amount of Rs.29,922/ (Rupees Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Two only) with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of filing of suit till the date of realization. 3. Court fee be refunded as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (M.S.LONE) Judge, Date:09/07/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 09/07/2019 Transcribed on :10/07/2019 Signed on :11/07/2019 -- 4 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT 910/2018 5 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 15/07/2019 at 11.30p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 09/07/2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 11/07/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 15/07/2019 -- 5 of 5 --
