EXECUTION APPLN
Smt. Rajabai Gangaram GadgeVsMr. Sanjay Vishram Berdiya
CNR MHCC010061092018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 03rd January 2019
TrustJury record updated 13 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100130/2018
- Registration Date
- 02 May 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 06-06-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Mr. Jain issue notice u/o. XXI Rule 22 of CPC, returnable on 13/07/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2018 Date: 13-07-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. None for Defendant. Mr. Jain states that he has lodged the present EA within 2 years of passing of Decree, and hence, there is no need for issue of notice, as ordered, vide Order dated 06/06/2018 and he prays that warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC be issued. In view of his statement, order of issuance of notice is hereby recalled and issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 15/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2018 Date: 15-10-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. None for Defendant. On request of Mr. Jain issue letter to the office of Deputy Sheriff of Mumbai, requesting to submit Sheriff\''s Certificate in respect of payment received so far from the Employer of the Defendant in compliance of warrant of salary attachment u/o.XXI Rule 48 of C.P.C. issued on 18/07/2018. S.O. to 03/01/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 03-01-2019 Date: 03-01-2019 Business: Shri. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Shri. Jain states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 18/07/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 03-01-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 104812/2018 Filing Date: 02-05-2018 First Hearing Date: 06th June 2018 Decision Date: 03rd January 2019 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
