Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 3

CNR MHCC01006084201919 Jan 2024
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 3 · 19 Jan 2024 · CNR MHCC010060842019

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: CS No. 100041 / 2019 Infobip India – Bhagyawan Exh.10 1 / 2
Further Examination in chief of plaintiff witness Arpita Jadhav
on oath by Adv. Dev Motta , for plaintiff.
Adv. Prashant Phophale present for defendant.
1) Affidavit now shown to me bears my signature. Its
contents are true. It is already marked as Exh.10. I have also filed
additional Evidence Affidavit. It is already marked as Exh.16 . I
have filed following document on record. Same be allotted Exhibit
mark.
Exh.19 : Original Copy of Messaging Services Agreement Dt.
07.03.2015, between plaintiff and defendant.
Exh.20 : Postal receipt Dt.15.12.2017.
Exh.21 : Acknowledgment Card Dt.15.12.2017.
Exh.22 : Postal receipt Dt.15.12.2017.
Exh.23 : Acknowledgment Card Dt.15.12.2017.
Exh.24 : Postal receipt Dt. 15.12.2017.
Exh.25 : Returned Envelop Dt. 15.12.2017.
Exh.26 : Postal receipt Dt. 15.12.2017.
Exh.27 : Returned Envelop Dt. 15.12.2017.
Exh.28 : Postal receipt Dt.26.09.2018
Exh.29 : Returned Envelop Dt.26.09.2018.
Exh.30 : Email Dt. 16.11.2015 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.31 : Email Dt. 07.12.2015 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.32 : Email Dt. 23.02.2016 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.33 : Email Dt. 29.02.2016 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.34 : Email Dt. 07.03.2015 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.35 : Email Dt. 09.03.2015 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.36 : Email Dt. 30.05.2016 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.37 : Email Dt. 17.08.2016 sent by Sarthak to Bhagyan .
Exh.38 : Original copy of Addendum No.1 Dt. 19.06.2015, to
the Messaging Services Agreement Dt. 07.03.2015.
Defendant objected allotting exhibit mark to the
-- 1 of 2 --
CS No. 100041 / 2019 Infobip India – Bhagyawan Exh.10 2 / 2
Addendum on the ground that, its copy filed by the
plaintiff at Page No. 38 of the plaint and the
document at Exh.38 are having mismatch.
Court observation : It is made clear to both parties that,
documents are marked as Exhibit (in accordance with contents
from evidence affidavit) for identification purpose.
Both sides are at liberty to prove and disprove the contents of the
documents, in accordance with various provisions, pertaining to
Commercial Courts Act, Code of Civil Procedure, Indian
Evidence Act and Information Technology Act.
Further examination in chief is over :
Matter adjourned for cross-examination.
Witness is dishcharge.
ROAC
Mumbai
Dated :19.01.2024
(Vijay S. Hingne)
Additional District Judge,
Court Room No.31 - Commercial Court,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.