Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

RAJABAI GANGARAM GADGEVsMr. Naresh Narayan Mahida

CNR MHCC010060802018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 03rd January 2019

TrustJury record updated 13 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100125/2018
Registration Date
23 Apr 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 06-06-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  On request of Mr. Jain issue notice u/o. XXI Rule 22 of CPC, returnable on 13/07/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2018
    
    Date: 13-07-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  None for Defendant. Mr. Jain states that he has lodged the present EA within 2 years of passing of Decree, and hence, there is no need for issue of notice, as ordered, vide Order dated 06/06/2018 and he prays that warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC be issued.  In view of his statement, order of issuance of notice is hereby recalled and issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 15/10/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2018
    
    Date: 15-10-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  None for Defendant. On request of Mr. Jain issue letter to the office of Deputy Sheriff of Mumbai, requesting to submit Sheriff\''s Certificate in respect of payment received so far from the Employer of the Defendant in compliance of warrant of salary attachment u/o.XXI Rule 48 of C.P.C. issued on 18/07/2018.  S.O. to 03/01/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 03-01-2019
    
    Date: 03-01-2019
    Business: Shri. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  Shri. Jain states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 18/07/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 03-01-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104705/2018
    Filing Date: 23-04-2018
    First Hearing Date: 06th June 2018
    Decision Date: 03rd January 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.