Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01006026201912 Jul 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 12 Jul 2019 · CNR MHCC010060262019

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: N.M.2166/19 in SC 2235/2018 1
Date :12.07.2019
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2166 OF 2019
IN
S.C. NO. 2235 OF 2018
(CNR.NO.MHCC010060262019)
Oriental Contractors Pvt. Ltd. ) ….Plaintiff
VERSUS
Zaibunnissa Ismail Sayyed ) .... Defendant
Appearances:
Mr. Suraj Gaikwad, Ld. Advocate for plaintiff present.
Mr. Vasim Shaikh, Ld. Advocate for defendant present.
Coram : His Honour Judge
Shri. A.H.Laddhad
Addl. Judge
CR No. : 32
Dated : 12th July, 2019.
: ORDER :
1. The defendant has filed Notice of Motion for condonation of 180
days delay in filing Written Statement.
2. It is contended by the defendant that she has received suit
summons on 15.11.2018. Thereafter, she has started collecting
necessary documents required for filing Written Statement. As she was
not having material to supply necessary information to her Advocate,
therefore, her Advocate issued letter to the advocate of defendant for
inspection of the document. Further, there were certain missing pages
in the plaint, therefore, her advocate issued letter to the plaintiff and
called for those missing pages.
3. It is further contended by the defendant that she is senior citizen
-- 1 of 4 --
N.M.2166/19 in SC 2235/2018 2
and having age of 72 years. It is very difficult for her to collect
necessary information and forward the same to her advocate.
Therefore, delay of 180 days has been caused in filing Written
Statement. The defendant further submitted that delay is not
intentional. If the delay is not condoned, it would prejudice to her right
to defend the suit.
4. Per contra Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff orally opposed the
application. Heard both the sides. Perused application and reasons
assigned. Admittedly, the defendant is old aged lady. It is not disputed
by the plaintiff that there were certain missing pages in the plaint which
were supplied to the defendant on 23.04.2019. The reasons shown by
the defendant are sufficient for the condonation of delay. In my view, if
the delay is not condoned, that would prejudice the right of defendant
to defence suit. Moreover, the defendant is old aged woman, in view of
that, the delay needs to be condoned. Thus, I proceed to pass the
following order.
: ORDER :
1. Notice of Motion No. 2166 of 2019 is hereby made absolute in
terms of prayer clause
2. The delay of 180 days be condoned without cost.
3. Notice of motion No. 2166 of 2019 is disposed off accordingly.
(A.H.Laddhad)
Additional Judge
Bombay City Civil Court
Dated : 12.07.2019 Greater Mumbai
Dictated on :12.07.2019
-- 2 of 4 --
N.M.2166/19 in SC 2235/2018 3
Transcribed on :12.07.2019
Draft submitted on :16.07.2019
Checked on :17.07.2019
Signed on :17.07.2019
-- 3 of 4 --
N.M.2166/19 in SC 2235/2018 4
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
17/07/2019 at 4.00 p.m. (Ms. V.V.Sawant)
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court
room no.)
Shri A.H.LADDHAD
(C.R. No.32)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ ORDER
12/07/2019
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by
P.O. on
17/07/2019
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded
on
17/07/2019
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.