Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 02 Feb 2023 · CNR MHCC010060182019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 Ch/sum. no.1099-19 in Suit no.7484-03 (H.Ct. Suit no. 3950 of 2003) MHCC010060182019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1099 OF 2019 IN SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.7484 of 2003 IN (HIGH COURT SUIT NO. 3950 OF 2003) Ms Kamala Developers … Plaintiff Vs. Jafferullah Shaikh And Ors … Defendants. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI VIRENDRA D. KEDAR (COURT ROOM NO.01) DATE : 2nd DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 :Appearances: The learned Adv. Harish Pawar for the plaintiff. The learned Adv. Manoj Pandey a/w Adv. Pooja Mishra for defendant no.2. ORAL ORDER The plaintiff has filed the present chamber summon under O. VI R. 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to carry out amendment in the plaint thereby want to replace shop numbers in the plaint from shop no.‘3' to shop no.‘2' and shop no.‘11' in the place of shop no.‘12'. -- 1 of 6 -- 2 Ch/sum. no.1099-19 in Suit no.7484-03 (H.Ct. Suit no. 3950 of 2003) 2. In short, it is contention of the plaintiff that, it has filed suit for recovery of outstanding amount against defendants towards the maintenance and for injunction. Due to typographical mistake and oversight, in the body of the plaint, the number of suit shop is wrongly mentioned as shop no.3 instead of shop no.2 and shop no. 12 instead of shop no.11. 3. It is further contended that, the plaintiff has filed two suits against the defendant no.1 and his wife Zora Begum for recovery of the amount. In another suit bearing no.7485/2003, shop numbers were wrongly mentioned. However due to death of the earlier advocate, the plaintiff has lost track of suit no.7485/03 and it came to be dismissed for default on 01/10/2016. Thereafter, the plaintiff has taken out notice of motion for restoration of suit, but it was also came to be rejected. Thus the plaintiff has challenged the said order before the Hon'ble High Court by preferring an appeal bearing no.362/17, which is pending for hearing. Thus, in view of such facts and circumstances of the case, it is necessary to permit to the plaintiff to change the number of suit shop as stated supra. Hence the chamber summons. 4. Defendant no.1 strongly opposed the chamber summons by filing reply on affidavit. It is contended that, the chamber summons taken out by the plaintiff is misconceived and frivolous. It is further contended that the suit filed by the plaintiff in respect of suit shop no.2 bearing no.7485/03 came to be dismissed. Hence the present chamber summons is not maintainable and liable to be rejected. -- 2 of 6 -- 3 Ch/sum. no.1099-19 in Suit no.7484-03 (H.Ct. Suit no. 3950 of 2003) 5. The defendant no.2 also strongly opposed the chamber summons by filing reply on affidavit. It is contended that the chamber summons taken out by the plaintiff is nothing but an abuse of process of law. The plaintiff has taken out the present chamber summons only to create encumbrances in respect of shop no.2, which has been acquired by defendant no.2 against valuable consideration. If the amendment is allowed then it would caused prejudice to defendant and will definitely change the entire nature of the suit. The plaintiff has filed the present chamber summons with an intention to fill up the lacuna which is not permissible under law. Hence, same may kindly be rejected. 6. Heard learned advocate for respective parties at length. Perused the record. 7. Following points arise for my determination to which I record my findings with reasons as follows: Sr. No. Points Determination. 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief claimed in chamber summons? Partly Yes. 2. What order ? As per final order :REASONS: As to point no.1: 8. It is to be noted that, by way of present chamber summons the plaintiff wants to correct the shop numbers. It is -- 3 of 6 -- 4 Ch/sum. no.1099-19 in Suit no.7484-03 (H.Ct. Suit no. 3950 of 2003) contention of the plaintiff, that in the agreement dated 08/03/1996 the description of shop is given wherein the number of shop is mentioned as shop no.2'. I have perused the agreement filed along with plaint at Exh.'B'. At para nos. 2 and 4, the description of shop is shown as shop no. 2 admeasuring 254 sq.ft. area. 9. It is submitted on behalf of defendants that, the another suit filed by the plaintiff in respect of shop no.2 came to be dismissed and hence to harass defendants, the plaintiff want to incorporate the number of said shop in the present suit. Whereas it is submitted by the plaintiff that, the said suit came to be dismissed in default and not on merits. Though Notice of motion taken out by the plaintiff, for restoration of said suit, came to be dismissed but the plaintiff has preferred an appeal from order bearing no. 362/17 and it is pending for adjudication. 10. The present chamber summons is taken out only to correct the number of shop and nothing else. As stated supra, prima faice there is mention of this number in the agreement. In my view if plaintiff be permitted to amend the plaint to that effect only then it neither change the nature of suit nor cause any prejudice to defendants. Hence following order: ORDER Chamber Summons No.1099/2019 stands partly allowed. The plaintiff is only permitted to carry out amendment in the plaint regarding replacing of shop numbers as prayed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.1000/ to each defendants. -- 4 of 6 -- 5 Ch/sum. no.1099-19 in Suit no.7484-03 (H.Ct. Suit no. 3950 of 2003) The plaintiff to carry out amendment within 14 Days. Chamber summons is disposed off accordingly. (Virendra D. Kedar) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court,Gr.Mumbai Date:.02.02.2023 (C.R. No.1) Dictated on : 02.02.2023 Transcribed on : 03.02.2023 Checked & Signed on : 04.02.2023 -- 5 of 6 -- 6 Ch/sum. no.1099-19 in Suit no.7484-03 (H.Ct. Suit no. 3950 of 2003) “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE 04.02.2023 NAME OF STENOGRAPHER(GI) Mr. V. S. Shinde TIME: Name of the Judge (With Court room no.) HHJ Shri Virendra D. Kedar (Court Room No.1) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGEMENT/ORDER 02.02.2023 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 04.02.2023 JUDGEMENT/ORDER uploaded on 04.02.2023 -- 6 of 6 --
