Final Order 1

Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement
Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT NO.516/2019 1
Received on : 02052018
Registered on : 02052019
Decided on : 01082019
Duration : 01Y 03M 01D
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 516 of 2019
CNR NO.: MHCC010059842018
Swati Sahebrao Gadge Age 30 years
of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant
having her address at Room No.11,
Stany Chawl, Wadia Estate, Kurla(West),
Mumbai400 070. ...Plaintiff
Versus
Vijay Manik Ghatvisave
age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian
Inhabitant working for gain with BMC Conservancy
Dept.,1st Floor, “L” Ward S.G.Barve Marg, Kurla
West Mumbai400 070, Worker No.4425036,
Paysheet No.6027 and residing at Prabudha Nagar
R.C.Marg, Chembur, Deepstambh Budh
Vihar Sarovar, Mumbai. ...Defendant.
Appearances:
Advocate Mr.Rameseh Jain and Mrs.Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff.
Defendants Exparte.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI.M.S.LONE
(C.R.NO.28)
DATED : 1ST AUGUST 2019
-- 1 of 5 --
SUMMARY SUIT NO.516/2019 2
J U D G M E N T
This is a suit for recovery of Rs.1,53,260/(Rupees One Lac Fifty
Three Thousand Two Hundred and Sixty only).
2. Plaintiff case in nut shell is that on 08/05/2015 defendant
executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for valuable
consideration of Rs.1,00,000/ the defendant also promised to pay
interest @ 18% p.a. on the said amount. Plaintiff demanded the said
amount but defendant refused to pay. Defendant is in default of
Rs.1,53,260/(Rupees One Lac Fifty Three Thousand Two Hundred and
Sixty only). Hence, this suit.
3. The defendant was served with summons for appearance but he
remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against him.
4. From the material on record following points come for my
determination and my findings with reasons are as follows:
POINTS FINDINGS
1. Whether plaintiff proves that
defendant executed promissory
note for valuable consideration?
Yes
2. Whether plaintiff proves that
amount of Rs.1,53,260/(Rupees
One Lac Fifty Three Thousand
Two Hundred and Sixty only) is
due and recoverable from
defendants?
Yes
3. Whether plaintiff is entitled for
recovery of Rs.1,53,260/(Rupees
One Lac Fifty Three Thousand
Two Hundred and Sixty only) with
Yes
-- 2 of 5 --
SUMMARY SUIT NO.516/2019 3
interest as claimed?
4. What order and decree? As per final order
REASONS
AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4.
5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To
prove its case plaintiff examined Shri.Manjush N Shete vide Exh.7 and
filed original promissory note and notice of demand.
6. Heard Ld.counsel for plaintiff.
7. The affidavit is supported by documents. The original promissory
note and advocates demand notice shows that on 08/05/2015
defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for
valuable consideration of Rs.1,00,000/ the defendant also promised to
pay interest @ 18% p.a. on the said amount. Plaintiff demanded the
said amount but defendant refused to pay. Defendant is in default of
Rs.1,53,260/(Rupees One Lac Fifty Three Thousand Two Hundred and
Sixty only).As far as rate of interest is concerned plaintiff has prayed for
rate of 18% p.a. As per section 80 of the N.I.Act 1882 such rate of
interest can be granted. Therefore, point No.1 to 3 is answer as 'Yes' and
following order is passed.
ORDER
1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs.
2. Defendant do pay to the plaintiff the amount of Rs.1,53,260/
(Rupees One Lac Fifty Three Thousand Two Hundred and Sixty only)
-- 3 of 5 --
SUMMARY SUIT NO.516/2019 4
with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till full and
final realization.
3. Court fee be refunded as per rules.
4. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
(M.S.LONE)
Judge,
Date: 01/08/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay
Dictated on : 01/08/2019
Transcribed on : 06/08/2019
Signed on : 19/08/2019
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
19/08/2019 at 12.00p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court
Room No.)
HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone
(C.R.NO.28)
Date of pronouncement of
Judgment/Order
01/08/2019
Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 19/08/2019
Judgment/Order uploaded on 19/08/2019
-- 4 of 5 --
SUMMARY SUIT NO.516/2019 5
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court
Room No.)
HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone
(C.R.NO.28)
Date of pronouncement of
Judgment/Order
01/08/2019
Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 19/08/2019
Judgment/Order uploaded on
-- 5 of 5 --