Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1394N/M NO.1834/18 IN SUM.SUIT NO.4560/13 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI MOTICE OF MOTION NO.1834 OF 2018 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 4560 OF 2013 (CNR NO.: MHCC010059472018) Mrs.Ramadevi Daga ...Plaintiff Versus M/s.Pioneer Synthetics ...Defendant And Mr.Achlesh Kumar Daga & ors. ...Applicants. Appearances: Advocate Mr.Ramesh Jain and Mrs.Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATE : 18TH OCTOBER 2019 ORDER This Notice of motion…
NOTICE OF MOTION
Ramdevi H. Daga - Applicants - Achlesh Daga And OrsVsMs Pioneer Synthetics
CNR MHCC01005947201828-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ORDER
Decision Date: 18th October 2019
TrustJury record updated 12 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101834/2018
- Registration Date
- 03 May 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 07-07-2018 Business: Plaintiff present. Adv. Sheetal Prakash i/b Muzoomdar for Plaintiff present. Aplnt present. Advocate for plaintiff has filed the vakalatnama, TOR She also filed copy of power of attorney and reply to the notice of motion, TOR. Matter is adjd. to 27/07/2018 for Hearing on N/M. L.O. Adv. Ramesh Jain for Aplnt present. He filed original notice of motion no.1834/18 alongwith affidavit, TOR. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2018 Date: 27-07-2018 Business: Adv. Sheetal for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. None for Aplnt. Matter is adjd. to 24/08/2018 for Hearing on N/M. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2018 Date: 24-08-2018 Reason For Adjournment: court time is over Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2018 Date: 16-11-2018 Business: Adv. Sheetal Prakash for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. The advocate for plaintiff is requested to dismissed the N/M , as it is nothing but delay tactics. Matter is adjd. to 12/12/2018 for Hearing on N/M as last chance. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2018 Date: 12-12-2018 Business: Aplnt present. Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present. Adv. Sheetal P. for Defendant present. With the consent of both the parties, Matter is adjd. to 28/01/2019 for N/M hearing at 3.30pm. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2019 Date: 28-01-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Aplnt present. None for Defendant. Advocate for Aplnt has filed affidavit to rejoinder, TOR. Matter is adjd. to 15/02/2019 for N/M hearing. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2019 Date: 15-02-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present. Adv. Sheetal Prakash for Defendant present. The advocate for plaintiff has already filed the application for allowing him to file the rejoinder. Order Otherside to say. Advocate for plaintiff served the copy of rejoinder to the advocate for defendant. Matter is adjd. to 11/03/2019 for Reply on Rejoinder. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2019 Date: 11-03-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Aplnt present. Adv. Sheetal Prakash for plaintiff present. Advocate for plaintiff has filed reply to the application of plaintiff, TOR. Matter is adjd. to 03/04/2019 for Hearing. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2019 Date: 03-04-2019 Business: Adv for plaintiff Ms.Sheetal present Applicant Mr.Achilesh present Applicant requested for adjournment O-Granted Matter is Adjd for Hearing to 02/07/2019 Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 02-07-2019 Date: 02-07-2019 Business: matter adjd on 23/8/2019. Reason For Adjournment: court time is over Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2019 Date: 23-08-2019 Business: Adv. Shital Prakash for plaintiff present. Adv. Ramesh Jain for applicant in NM present. None for deft . Adjd. to 04.09.2019 for nm hearing. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2019 Date: 04-09-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for applicant present. Adv. Sheetal Prakash for plaintiff present. By consent, adjd. to 03.10.2019 for nm hearing. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2019 Date: 03-10-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for applicant present. Adv. Sheetal Prakash for plaintiff present. KB at 2.45 p.m. LO At 3.00 p.m. Same appearance Heard argument of applicant on NM. Adjd. for argument of adv. of plaintiff to 04.10.2019 at 3.00 p.m. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 04-10-2019 Date: 04-10-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for applicant. Adv. Shital Prakash for Plaintiff. Heard arguments of Adv for plaintiff. Heard Rejoinder of Adv. for applicant. Adjd to 11/10/2019 for orders. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2019 Date: 11-10-2019 Business: Plaintiff present. Adv. for Adjd. to 18.10.2019 for order. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2019 Date: 18-10-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for applicant present. Adv. Sheetal Prakash for plaintiff present. F.R.S.R. following order is passed. ORDER Notice of Motion No.1834/2018 stands rejected. Nature Of Disposal: ORDER Disposal Date: 18-10-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 106373/2018 Filing Date: 03-05-2018 First Hearing Date: 07th July 2018 Decision Date: 18th October 2019 Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
18 Oct 2019
Order 1Full order available
18 Oct 2019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1394N/M NO.1834/18 IN SUM.SUIT NO.4560/13 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI MOTICE OF MOTION NO.1834 OF 2018 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 4560 OF 2013 (CNR NO.: MHCC010059472018) Mrs.Ramadevi Daga ...Plaintiff Versus M/s.Pioneer Synthetics ...Defendant And Mr.Achlesh Kumar Daga & ors. ...Applicants. Appearances: Advocate Mr.Ramesh Jain and Mrs.Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATE : 18TH OCTOBER 2019 ORDER This Notice of motion…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
