CHAMBER SUMMONS
M/s. Manipal Techologies LtdVsInstitute of Engineering and Management C/o. Prof. P. I. patil
CNR MHCC01005842201928-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 18th February 2020
TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101080/2019
- Registration Date
- 14 Jun 2019
Advocates
2For Petitioner
For Respondent
Parties
2Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 16-07-2019 Business: Both parties and their adv are absent. LO at 1.00 p.m. Adv. Mr. Sandip Singh for defendant present. Registered Ch/s no. 1080/19 a/w affidavit tendered by adv. for deft. Copy be served to plaintiff. Matter is adjd for reply on Ch/s on 04.09.2019. Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2019 Date: 04-09-2019 Business: None for both parties. Adjd. to 19.12.2019 for affidavit of service. Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2019 Date: 19-12-2019 Business: None present. Matter adjd to 09/03/2020 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2020 Date: 18-02-2020 Business: Adv. Jayesh Gowde for plaintiff Adv. Singh for defendant By consent Chamber summons taken on board. He did file reply to the Ch/s 1080/19. However, he resisted the request made in the Ch/s contending that no ground is made out to condone the delay and therefore Ch/s may be rejected. The affidavit in support of chamber summons shows that time was required to the defendant to search the documents, further he was ill in between period and also his advocate was not available for some period. Therefore, the defendant could not file the reply. The contentions being on affidavit those are acceptable. Considering the same and in the interest of justice the delay caused to file the reply is condoned and the reply on behalf of the defendant be accepted on record subject to cost of Rs.1000/-. The chamber summons 1080/19 is disposed. Adv. for defendant filed SJ reply. It be kept on record subject to compliance of the Ch/s 1080/19 order. Adjd for compliance and depending on the compliance for re-joinder as the plaintiff proposes to file the rejoinder to 23-04-2020 Nature Of Disposal: OTHER Disposal Date: 18-02-2020
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 106334/2019 Filing Date: 14-06-2019 First Hearing Date: 16th July 2019 Decision Date: 18th February 2020 Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 118 Feb 2020
18 Feb 2020
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: Adv. Jayesh Gowde for plaintiff Adv. Singh for defendant By consent Chamber summons taken on board. He did file reply to the Ch/s 1080/19. However, he resisted the request made in the Ch/s contending that no ground is made out to condone the delay and therefore Ch/s may be rejected. The affidavit in support of chamber summons shows that time was required to the defendant to search the documents, further he was ill in between period and also his advocate was not available for some period. Therefore, the defendant could not file the reply. The contentions being on affidavit those are acceptable. Considering the same and in the interest of justice the delay caused to file the reply is condoned and the reply on behalf of the defendant be accepted on record subject to cost of Rs.1000/-. The chamber summons 1080/19 is disposed. Adv. for defendant filed SJ reply. It be kept on record subject to compliance of the Ch/s 1080/19 order. Adjd for compliance and depending on the compliance for re-joinder as the plaintiff proposes to file the rejoinder to 23-04- 2020 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.