Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 08 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010057822019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Summ. Suit No. 625 of 2019 Presented On : 18.06.2019 Registered On : 18.06.2019 Delivered On : 08.01.2020 Duration : 0Y.06M.21D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.625 OF 2019 (CNR NO. MH CC010057822018) Exhibit 13 1. Mr. Sitaram P. Salunkhe. Age.:63 years, Occ.:Advocate, Address : Room No.201, Shyam Sundar Sadan, 2nd Floor, S.J. Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai – 400 013. 2. Mrs. Deval Sitaram Salunkhe. Age.: 58 years, Occ.: Housewife, Address: Room No.201, Shyam Sundar Sadan, 2nd Floor, S.J. Marg, Lower Parel(West), Mumbai – 400 013. ….Plaintiffs. ..Versus.. Mr. Prakash Ramchandra Yadav, Age.: 51 years, Occ.: Agriculture, Address: Kusavade, Post: Helvak, Taluka : Patan, District – Satara, Pin Code : 415 207. ...Defendant. SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF Rs.6,00,000/ Appearance: Mr.M.P.Pawar, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Exparte against Defendant. -- 1 of 6 -- 2 Summ. Suit No. 625/2019 CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SABIHA. G. SHAIKH Adhoc Judge City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay (C.R.NO.59) DATE : 08 th January, 2020 : J U D G M E N T : 1. This is a summary suit under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908. 2. The facts of the suit are summarized as under : Plaintiff no. 1 is husband of plaintiff no.2 and residing at Room No.201, Shyam Sundar Sadan, 2nd Floor, S.J.Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai400 013. The defendant is an agriculturist. The defendant is the friend of plaintiff no.1. The plaintiff no.1 had applied for loan of Rs.20,00,000/ to Vijay Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Mumbai by mortgaging house of the plaintiff no.1 to the said society. As per application made by plaintiff no.1, the Vijay Cooperative Credit Society Ltd had given the loan to plaintiff no.1 on 14.06.2016. After receipt of the loan, plaintiff no.1 deposited his loan amount in his bank account of Bank of Maharashtra, Lower Parel (West) Branch, Mumbai – 400 013. The defendant requested to plaintiff no.1 for friendly loan. Hence, plaintiff no. 1 & 2 paid the amount of Rs.6,00,000/ by way of cheque bearing no. 007667 dated 16/06/2016 to the defendant. The Defendant executed in favour of plaintiffs a promissory note of Rs.6,00,000/ dated 16 th June, 2016 against the loan of Rs.6,00,000/ received by the defendant from the plaintiff on the the above said date by the said promissory note. The defendant had promised to pay to -- 2 of 6 -- 3 Summ. Suit No. 625/2019 plaintiffs the said sum of Rs.6,00,000/ with interest thereon, at the rate of 18% per annum on demand. But, the defendant failed to pay to plaintiffs inspite of demands, reminders and receipt of the legal notice dated 07th August, 2018. Hence, plaintiffs are constrained to file the suit for recovery of the said amount. The total suit claim of plaintiffs for Rs.6,00,000/. 3. The suit summons were duly served on the defendant but he failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2 (3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908. 4. The following points arise for my determination and my findings there on are as under for the reasons stated there under : POINTS FINDINGS 1 What is due and payable from the defendant to the plaintiffs ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.6,00,000/ with interest @ 10 % per annum. 2 What order and decree? Suit is decreed. R E A S O N S 5. The plaintiff Sitaram Parshuram Solunkhe has filed his affidavit at Exhibit6. In order to prove the case of the plaintiff filed following documentary evidence. Exhibit. No. Description of documents Date Exhibit8 Original Promissory note of Rs.6,00,000/ 16/06/2016 Exhibit 9 Receipt 16/06/2016 Exhibit 10 Plaintiff's notice and acknowledgment. 07/08/2018 -- 3 of 6 -- 4 Summ. Suit No. 625/2019 Exhibit11 Demand notice of plaintiff's advocate and acknowledgment 17/11/2018 Exhibit 12 (collectively) Plaintiff's final notice and postal receipt and Track Consignment report. 06/05/2019 and 09/05/2019 AS TO POINT NO.1 : 6. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at Exhibit8,9, 10, 11 and 12 (collectively) goes to establish that plaintiffs have given amount of Rs.6,00,000/ to the defendant as loan. The documents further prove that the amount of Rs.6,00,000/ is due and payable to plaintiffs from defendant towards the loan amount. The defendant has failed to repay the said loan amount to plaintiffs. The documents at list Exhibits 8 to 11(Collectively) goes to establish that the defendant is liable to pay Rs.6,00,000/ to plaintiffs on the date of filing of the suit towards the said loan amount and therefore the defendant has failed to repay his loan amount to plaintiffs. In this background, it is held that plaintiffs are entitled to recover sum of Rs.6,00,000/ from the defendant. 7. The plaintiff has claimed 18% per annum on the principle amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of interest may exceeds 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case the transaction is commercial one and there is no such contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. Therefore, the transaction is a simple handloan transaction and rate of interest @ 10% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principle sum adjudged i.e. amount of Rs.6,00,000/. Hence, point No.1 is answered in the affirmative. -- 4 of 6 -- 5 Summ. Suit No. 625/2019 AS TO POINT NO.2: 8. In view of discussion and finding on point No.1 it is held that plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.6,00,000/ from the defendant with interest at the rate of Rs.10% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from defendants. Hence, in answered to point No.2, I proceed to pass the following order. : O R D E R : 1.The defendant shall pay Rs.6,00,000/ (Rupees Six Lacs only) to plaintiffs with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. Defendant do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per rule. Date:08.01.2020 (Ms. S. G. Shaikh) AdHoc Judge, City & Civil Court, Gr. Bombay Typed on : 08.01.2020 Signed on : -- 5 of 6 -- 6 Summ. Suit No. 625/2019 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED ORDER.” 14.01.2020 at 11.20 am. PUSHPA RAMESH WAGH UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge HHJ SMT S.G.SHAIKH (Court Room No.59) Date of pronouncement of Order 08.01.2020 Order signed by P.O. on 08.01.2020 Order uploaded on 14.01.2020 -- 6 of 6 --
