Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Vardisingh Kishansingh Rajput alias ShankarbhaiVsJivraj Laxman Solanki

CNR MHCC0100577820192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 14th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102083/2019
Registration Date
13 Jun 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 14-06-2019
Business: Adv. Bharat Kothari for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Puranik for Defendant present.
Defendant present.
Defendant tendered original NM No.2083/19 t.o.r.
Say filed by Plaintiff on NM No.2083/19.
Order below NM No.2083/19.
Read Notice of Motion, affidavit in support of it, say of Plaintiff. Heard respective counsel for parties.
Notice of motion is taken out by defendant for grant of permission to file written statement and to condone the delay caused in filing the same.
Plaintiff opposed notice of motion on the count that there is delay in filing notice of motion and if allowed, it may be subject to cost.
It is not in dispute that Adv for defendant waived service of writ of summons on 27.02.2019. Defendant failed to file written statement within prescribed time. It is contended that delay was occurred due to personal difficulties, he has good chances to succeed on merits.
It is a settled law that Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in specific circumstances the WS can be accepted with reasons. It is also held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem Bar Association V/s Union of India (2003 AIR SCC 189) and Zolba V/s Keshav (2008 AIR SCC 2099).
Keeping in view above legal position and reason assigned by the defendant, it is not just to deprive defendant from contesting the matter on merits. The delay caused not inordinate and deliberate. Therefore, I am inclined to condone the delay caused in filing written statement and permit him to file written statement. However, considering the conduct of defendant, it is necessary to impose certain costs upon him. Hence, pass following order.
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion NO.2083/19 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-(Rupees One thousand only) to the plaintiff within period of one week. Defendant is at liberty to deposit cost payable to the plaintiff in Court.
2. On payment of costs the defendant has to file written statement within a period of one week.
Accordingly, NM No.2083/19 is disposed off.
Adj for compliance to 22.07.2019.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 14-06-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 106268/2019
Filing Date: 13-06-2019
First Hearing Date: 14th June 2019
Decision Date: 14th June 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
14 Jun 2019

Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 14.06.2019 SU 398/19 @ NM 839/19 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Bharat Kothari for Plaintiff present. Adv. Puranik for Defendant present. Defendant present. Defendant tendered original NM No.2083/19 t.o.r. Say filed by Plaintiff on NM No.2083/19. Order below NM No.2083/19. Read Notice of Motion, affidavit in support of it, say of Plaintiff. Heard respective counsel for parties. Notice of motion is taken out by defendant for grant of permission to file…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.