Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01005700201803 Jul 2018
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 03 Jul 2018 · CNR MHCC010057002018

Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: CH/s. 801/18 IN Sum. S No.218/18 Oral Order 1
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.801 OF 2018
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.218 OF 2018
Deepak Shankar Pawar
Age : 38 yrs
of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant
having his address at Sidhivinayak Coop.
Society, 2nd Floor, Room No. 206,
Near Kamraj School, 90 Feet Road,
Dharavi, Mumbai – 400 017 ...Plaintiff
V/s
Parshuram S. Sampat
of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant,
working for gain with AHS (SWM) “L” Ward,
Assistant Commissioner, BMC, L Ward, S.G. Barve
Marg, Kurla West, Mumbai – 400 029.
Pay sheet No. 6024 (SWM), EC No. 3952739,
and residing at Kalina Kunchi Kurve Nagar
Pujari Chawl, Santacruz East, Galli No. 7,
Mumbai – 400 029. ...Defendants
Coram : His Honour Judge Shri M.M.Umar
(C.R. No.28)
Dated : 03/07/2018
Adv. Mr. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
ORAL ORDER
1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the plaintiff for
amendment in the title of plaint, in respect of name of defendant from
-- 1 of 3 --
CH/s. 801/18 IN Sum. S No.218/18 Oral Order 2
Parshuram S. Sampat to Parshuram Sampat Pawar.
2. Read the application and heard. It appears that the name of
defendant is typed as “Parshuram S. Sampat” in the title clause of the
plaint, instead of “Parshuram Sampat Pawar”. It appears that it is a
typographical mistake and if the application is allowed to correct the
said typographical mistake, no prejudice would caused to the defendant
as he is yet to be served with the suit summons. Considering the nature
of amendment, the interest of justice requires to allow the Ch/sum, In
the result following order :
ORDER
1. Chamber summons no.801/18 is allowed.
2. The plaintiff is permitted to correct the name of defendant
from “Parshuram S. Sampat” to “Parshuram Sampat Pawar”
and the plaintiff is directed to carry out the said amendment
in the title clause of the plaint on or before the next date,
without fail.
3. After carrying out the amendment, it is for the plaintiff to
serve the suit summons effectively on the defendant, through
Court.
4. Chamber Summons no.801/18 is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/
(M.M.UMAR)
Judge,
03/07/2018 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai
Date of Dictation : 03/07/18.
Date of Transcription : 03/07/18.
Date of signature : 03/07/18
-- 2 of 3 --
CH/s. 801/18 IN Sum. S No.218/18 Oral Order 3
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGEMENT/ORDER”
UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
06/07/2018 5.00 PM G. P. Acharekar Steno, L.G.
Name of the Judge HHJ Shri M. M. Umar (CR No.28)
Date of Pronouncement of Judgement/Order. 03/07/2018
Judgement/order signed by P.O on 05/07/2018
Judgement/order uploaded on 06/07/2018
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.