Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Santosh Suryakant KadamVsAnand Suryakant Kadam +3 more

CNR MHCC0100560820192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 13th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102026/2019
Registration Date
10 Jun 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

5

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 13-06-2019
Business: Adv. Rajeshwar for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Rajesh Kanojia filed V/n for Defendant nos.2 to 4 t.o.r.
He tendered original NM no.2026/19 t.o.r.
Deft no.2 present.
Say filed by Plaintiff on NM No.2026/19.
Order below NM No.2026/19.
Notice of motion is taken out by defendant nos.2 to 4 for grant of permission to file written statement by condoning delay of 172 days caused in filing written statement by them.
Plaintiff opposed notice of motion on the count that delay is not explained.
Heard respective counsel for parties.
At the outset I would like to mention that, it is a settled law that Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in specific circumstances the WS can be accepted with reasons. It is also held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem Bar Association V/s Union of India (2003 AIR SCC 189) and Zolba V/s Keshav (2008 AIR SCC 2099).
I am of the view that reasons assigned by these defendants are sufficient to condone delay caused in filing written statement. Moreso, delay caused is not inordinate. It cannot be said that delay caused is deliberate. It is pertinent to note that these defendants have also filed written statement alongwith present notice of motion to show their bonafide. In the facts of matter, I am inclined to condone the delay caused in filing of written statement and permit these defendants to file their written statement on record. However, considering the conduct of these defendants, it is necessary to impose certain costs upon them. Hence, pass following order.
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion No.2026/19 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c) subject to deposit of costs of Rs.1,000/-(Rupees One Thousand only) in Legal Aid funds of DLSA within period of two weeks.
2. On deposit of costs, written statement filed by these defendants be marked exhibit.
Accordingly, NM 2026/19 is disposed off.
Adj for NM reply in NM 481/19 and for compliance to 26.07.2019.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 13-06-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 106131/2019
Filing Date: 10-06-2019
First Hearing Date: 13th June 2019
Decision Date: 13th June 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
13 Jun 2019

Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 13.06.2019 SU 1486/18 @ NM Ex.2 481/19 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Rajeshwar for Plaintiff present. Adv. Rajesh Kanojia filed V/n for Defendant nos.2 to 4 t.o.r. He tendered original NM no.2026/19 t.o.r. Deft no.2 present. Say filed by Plaintiff on NM No.2026/19. Order below NM No.2026/19. Notice of motion is taken out by defendant nos.2 to 4 for grant of permission to file written statement by condoning delay of 172…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.