Full Order Text
Interim Order 1 · 18 Sept 2019 · CNR MHCC010054712019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 1973-19 in Suit No. 1780-09 CNR NO.MHCC0100019619 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1973 OF 2019 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 1780 OF 2009 Kundapur Mahabal Nagraj M. Shet …....Plaintiff V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. ..... Defendants Coram : Sanjay N. Yadav, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 18th September, 2019 Appearance: Ld. Adv. Mr. S.M. Khaire for the plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mr. Pradeep Patil for defendant/MCGM. ORDER 1. The plaintiff by this notice of motion seeks to produce certain documents showing that the Electric Meters are installed from 1972 till 2018. He also had inspected the suit premises and had filed report by Consultant Architect Shri. H.S. Hariani and submitted a report dated 30.05.2019. The documents are secured by making Right To Information Application. The plaintiff seeks to incorporate the pleadings in the plaint to that effect. 2. Heard Learned Advocate for the plaintiff and Learned Advocate for the defendant corporation. -- 1 of 3 -- 2 NM 1973-19 in Suit No. 1780-09 Order 18, Rule 17A reads as under: ''Production of evidence not previously known or which could not be produced despite due diligence.Where a party satisfies the Court that, after the exercise of due diligence, any evidence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when that party was leading his evidence, the Court may permit that party to produce that evidence at a later stage on such terms as may appear to it to be just.'' It was for the plaintiff to show the exercise of due diligence the evidence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced at the time of filing of suit. The suit is for evidence. The plaintiff had ample opportunity to secure these documents. The documents are sought in the year 2019. It cannot be said that the plaintiff was not within the knowledge of the documents. The Notice of Motion, therefore, cannot be entertained and deserves to be dismissed. In the result, following order is passed. ORDER The Notice of Motion No. 1973/2019 is dismissed. (Sanjay N. Yadav) Judge, Date : 18.09.2019 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 18.09.2019 Transcribed on : 21.09.2019. Signed by HHJ on : 24.09.2019 -- 2 of 3 -- 3 NM 1973-19 in Suit No. 1780-09 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 25.09.2019 at 11.05 a.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. K.S.Bhosale Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. Sanjay N. Yadav C.R. no. 05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 18.09.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 24.09.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 25.09.2019 -- 3 of 3 --
