Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010053392018 Filed on :20.04.2018 Registered On: 04.06.2018 Decided on :08/03/2021 Duration :Y-02/M-10/D-19 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 566 OF 2018 EXHIBIT-5 Dipak Ramanlal Dani Aged about 65 years Indian Inhabitant, carrying on business in the name and style of The Advance Tube Co., as its sole proprietor at 99, Nagdevi Street, Mumbai-400 003 ...Plaintiff V/s. Rochem Green Energy Pvt. Ltd. A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956,…
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT
Dipak Ramanlal DaniVsRochem Green Energy Pvt Ltd
CNR MHCC01005339201859-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DECREED
Decision Date: 08th March 2021
TrustJury record updated 12 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100566/2018
- Registration Date
- 04 Jun 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order37 · Rule2
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 30-07-2018 Business: Adv. Shetty for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Matter is adjd. to 12/10/2018 for Service Report. Next Purpose: REPORT Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2018 Date: 12-10-2018 Business: None for Plaintiff. None for Defendant. Matter is adjd. to 15/01/2019 for Report. L.O. Adv. Shetty for plaintiff present. He has filed affidavit of service. Next Purpose: REPORT Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2019 Date: 15-01-2019 Business: None present Matter is Adjd for Report on 01/03/2019 Next Purpose: REPORT Next Hearing Date: 01-03-2019 Date: 01-03-2019 Business: HHJ is on Mediation Training Next Purpose: REPORT Next Hearing Date: 12-04-2019 Date: 12-04-2019 Business: Matter transferred from Cr. no.09. Adv. Ganesh Shetty Present for the Plff. None Present for the deft. Proceeded Ex-parte. Ld counsel for the plff filed sevice affidavit. t.o.r. as per service affidavit deft served by RPAD as per postal acknowledgement place on record. When called deft absent. Hence suit proceeded Ex-parte against deft. Adj. for Ex-parte evidence on 04/072019. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2019 Date: 04-07-2019 Business: As the court is on leave Board is discharged and the matter stands adjd. To 03.09.2019 Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2019 Date: 03-09-2019 Business: Both the parties and their advocate are absent. Matter adj 16.10.2019 for Ex-parte Evidence. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2019 Date: 16-10-2019 Business: None present. KB L.O. at 12.55pm Adv. Ganesh Shetty for plaintiff present, he seeks adjournment on ground that documents are not yet received. O-granted. Matter adj for Ex-parte evidence to 16.11.2019. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2019 Date: 16-11-2019 Business: COURT IS VACANT. BOARD DISCHARGED. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2020 Date: 08-01-2020 Business: Adv. for Plaintiff present and requested for adjourning the matter. Hence adjd. None for defendant. Adjd. for Exparte Evidence to 16/3/2020. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2020 Date: 16-03-2020 Business: Both the parties and his advocate are absent. Matter is adjd to 29.06.2020 for ex-parte evidence. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 29-06-2020 Date: 29-06-2020 Business: Due to covid-19 Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2020 Date: 23-07-2020 Business: Due to covid-19 Lockdown Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2020 Date: 05-08-2020 Business: Due to Covid-19 Lockdown Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2020 Date: 03-10-2020 Business: Due to Covid-19 Lockdown Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 12-01-2021 Date: 12-01-2021 Business: Both the parties and his advocate are absent. Matter is adjd to 05.03.2021 for Ex-parte evidence. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2021 Date: 05-03-2021 Business: Plaintiff present. Defendant absent. Adv. Ganesh Shetty for the plff. Present. Adv. For the plff. Filed affidavit of examination in chief. t.o.r. marked as Exh-3 Order - Seen and filed. Adv. For the plff. Filed list of document. t.o.r. makred as Exh-4 Order - Seen and filed. Argument heard. Matter is adjd to 08.03.2021 for ex-parte judgment. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT Next Hearing Date: 08-03-2021 Date: 08-03-2021 Business: Plaintiff absent. Adv. Mr. Ganesh Shetty for the plaintiff. Argument heard. Judgment Exh- 5 For reason separately recorded following order is passed. ORDER 1.The defendant shall pay Rs.3,03,500/- (Rs. Three Lakh Three Thousand Five Hundred Only) to the plaintiff and he shall also pay with interest on principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/- at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2.The defendant do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3.Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. 4.Decree be drawn accordingly. Nature Of Disposal: DECREED Disposal Date: 08-03-2021
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 105920/2018 Filing Date: 20-04-2018 First Hearing Date: 30th July 2018 Decision Date: 08th March 2021 Court Number And Judge: 59-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
08 Mar 2021
Order 1Full order available
08 Mar 2021
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010053392018 Filed on :20.04.2018 Registered On: 04.06.2018 Decided on :08/03/2021 Duration :Y-02/M-10/D-19 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 566 OF 2018 EXHIBIT-5 Dipak Ramanlal Dani Aged about 65 years Indian Inhabitant, carrying on business in the name and style of The Advance Tube Co., as its sole proprietor at 99, Nagdevi Street, Mumbai-400 003 ...Plaintiff V/s. Rochem Green Energy Pvt. Ltd. A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956,…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
