Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mrs.Rashmi Diptarka Mukhopadhyay alias Mrs.Rashmi Deven MehtaVsMr.Divya Diptarka Mukhopadhyay Alias Mr.Divya Deven Mehta

CNR MHCC0100532220192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 06th November 2019

TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101911/2019
Registration Date
28 May 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 13-08-2019
Business: Plaintiff is present. Adv absent.
Adv. Aakash Menon for defendant present.
Plaintiff is directed to file registered NM on record and copy of it be served on other side.
Adj for service to 30.09.2019.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2019

Date: 30-09-2019
Business: Adv.S.V.Chaughule for Plaintiff present.
Adv. for Aksah Menon defendant  present.
Ex 3 Adv. for plaintiff filed vakalatnama t.o.r.
Adv. for defendant supplied copy of NM to the plaintiff
Adjd.6.11.2019 to for reply.
KB
LO
Defendant tendered original NM 1911/19 t.o.r
Adjd.6.11.2019 to for reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2019

Date: 06-11-2019
Business: Adv. S.V. Chaughule for plaintiff present.
Adv. Bensy Ramkrishnan for defendant present.
Say filed by the plaintiff.
Heard respective counsel for the plaintiff.
KB
LO
Order below Notice of Motion No. 1911/19.
Read Notice of Motion, Affidavit in Support of it, reply of plaintiff.  Heard respective Counsel for parties.
Notice of Motion is taken out by the defendant to condone delay caused in filing Written Statement and to take the same on record.  It is the contention of defendant that Writ of Summons is not served upon him.   He inquired with advocate for plaintiff about service of Writ of Summons but did not receive any response.  It is further contended that defendant is young college student and if he is not permitted to file Written Statement then he will suffer great loss and no prejudice will be caused to the plaintiff if Written Statement is taken on record. Accordingly, he made prayer in above terms.
During the Course of argument Ld. Advocate for defendant put forth some additional ground for consideration of present Notice of Motion.  It is contended that as the proceeding of Ad-interim relief was pending so Written Statement remained to be filed and defendant was under impression that unless Writ of Summons is served Written Statement cannot be filed. Accordingly she prayed for condoning the delay caused in filing Written Statement.
Plaintiff has opposed Notice of Motion on the ground that no sufficient cause is shown by the defendant.  Accordingly plaintiff prayed for rejection of Notice of Motion.
Before adverting to the facts I would like to mention that it is a settled law that Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in specific circumstances written statement can be accepted with reasons. It is also held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem Bar Association V/s Union of India 2003 AIR SCC 189 and Zolba V/s Keshav 2008 AIR SCC 2099). In view of this legal position, now, I consider notice of motion.
In present case it appears from record that matter was referred for mediation but matter was not settled.  Thereafter my Ld. Predecessor has passed order below Notice of Motion no. 2061/18 on 15.11.2018.  On the said date matter was adjourned and posted for Written Statement to 04.05.2019.  On that date defendant has taken out present Notice of Motion.  No doubt there is grudges on the part of the defendant on not filing Written Statement in prescribed period but circumstances as pointed above created impression defendant could file Written Statement by 04.05.2019.  In the facts of present matter, in the interest of justice and fare trial, it is unjust to refrain defendant from contesting the matter on merits.  Therefore, I am inclined to allow present Notice of Motion subject to payment of certain costs to plaintiff by the defendant.  Hence, pass following order
                                  ORDER
1) Notice of Motion No. 1911/2019 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs of Rs. 3000/- (Rs. Three Thousand only) to the plaintiff within period of one week from the date of order.  Defendant is at liberty to deposit costs payable to the plaintiff in Court.
2)  After payment of cost Written Statement of Defendant be taken on record and marked Exhibit.
3)  Accordingly Notice of Motion No. 1911/2019 is disposed off.
Matter is adjourned and posted for direction to 09.12.2019.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 06-11-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 105739/2019
Filing Date: 28-05-2019
First Hearing Date: 13th August 2019
Decision Date: 06th November 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
06 Nov 2019

Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 6.11.2019 SU 1785/18 NM 1911/19 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. S.V. Chaughule for plaintiff present. Adv. Bensy Ramkrishnan for defendant present. Say filed by the plaintiff. Heard respective counsel for the plaintiff. KB LO Order below Notice of Motion No. 1911/19. Read Notice of Motion, Affidavit in Support of it, reply of plaintiff. Heard respective Counsel for parties. Notice of Motion is taken out by the defendant to condone delay caused…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.