SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Mr. Jayaram Koraga Shetty +1 moreVsSeema Sunil Mittal +5 more
CNR MHCC01005071202012-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--WITHDRAWL
Decision Date: 27th January 2021
TrustJury record updated 30 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101262/2020
- Registration Date
- 12 Nov 2020
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
8Acts & Sections
2CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec Order 39 · Rule 1 And 2
Specific Relief Act · Sec 12
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 23-11-2020 Business: By preciepe. O-allowed Adv. Mr. Pravin Patel h/f Adv. Mr. Sagar Kamble for the plff present and he tendered draft NM alongwith affidavit in support and the service affidavit. t.o.r. O-Leave is granted to register. Adv. Mr. Bhadang i/b Humranwala for deft-1 and 2 present and he filed reply to draft NM. t.o.r. Adv. Mr. Chandrashekhar for deft-3/MHADA present. Adv. Ms. Chandramore for deft- 4/BMC present. Heard the Ld advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant Nos. 1 and 2. The Ld advocate for the plaintiff submits urgency for ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) to direct the defts to maintain status-quo in respect of land CS No. 176. However, the dispute appears to be only in respect of installation of electricity cabinet for supply to the disputed building-B. The Ld advocate submits that the defendant No.5 be directed to maintain status-quo in respect of such installation and digging in the premises of building-A for laying down the electricity cables. The Ld advocate for deft nos. 1 and 2 who are the developers submits that the electricity cabinet has been already installed and its photographs is produced alongwith reply. The plaintiff has prayed in the suit that such installation be declared as illegal as not being carried out with consent of the plaintiff/ land owner. Considering the main prayer made in the suit and the interim relief asked in this Notice of Motion it would be just and proper to hear both the parties on this notice of motion and to decide it on its merit. The agreed fact that electricity cabinet has been already installed as is appearing in the photograph with reply is taken on record. There shall not be any excavation on the land of building-A till hearing and decision of this NM. Matter is adjd. to 27.01.2021 for hearing on NM. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2021 Date: 27-01-2021 Business: Adv. Harshda Kamble for the plaintiff. Adv. Ms. Mansi for the defendants No.1 and 2 Adv. Mr. Chandrshekhar for the defendant No.3. Adv. Chandramore for the defendant No.4. Adv. Kapse for the defendant No.6 Advocate for the plaintiff has filed pursis/application for withdrawal of suit unconditionally. ORDER 1. In view of the pursis/application at Exh.6, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn 2. Suit No.1262 of 2020 is accordingly disposed of. 3. Bill of costs be prepared accordingly. Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWL Disposal Date: 27-01-2021
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 105386/2020 Filing Date: 02-11-2020 First Hearing Date: 23rd November 2020 Decision Date: 27th January 2021 Court Number And Judge: 12-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 127 Jan 2021
27 Jan 2021
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Adv. Harshda Kamble for the plaintiff. Adv. Ms. Mansi for the defendants No.1 and 2 Adv. Mr. Chandrshekhar for the defendant No.3. Adv. Chandramore for the defendant No.4. Adv. Kapse for the defendant No.6 Advocate for the plaintiff has filed pursis/application for withdrawal of suit unconditionally. ORDER 1. In view of the pursis/application at Exh.6, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn 2. Suit No.1262 of 2020 is accordingly disposed of. 3. Bill of costs be prepared accordingly. 4. Notice of Motion No. 1811 of 2020 which is not tendered in the Court, but appeared in CIS is disposed of. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
