Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 05 Feb 2022 · CNR MHCC010050502020
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010050502020 Filed on :09.11.2020 Registered On : 06.01.2021 Decided on :05.02.2022 Duration : Y-01/M-02/D-27 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 24 OF 2021 IN Exhibit-08 CNR No:-MHCC01-005050-2020 Messrs. Krishna Metal Corporation through its Proprietor, Mr. Kapuraram M. Rajpurohit , having office At 119/123 Vyas Sadan, Ground Floor, Shop No.4, Dr. M.G. Mahimtura Marg, 3rd Kumbharwada Lane, Mumbai- 400 004. ...Plaintiff V/s. 1 Govindrajulu Muralidharan Proprietor of Messrs. Shri. Vijyalaxmi Industries having its office at old No. 54 New No. 26A, Sowripalayam Road, Opp. Sujani Mill, Coimbatore-641 028, T.N. 2. Jaya Vijayalaxmi Industries Signatories of Messrs. Shri. Vijyalaxmi Industries having its office at old No. 54 New No. 26A, Sowripalayam Road, Opp. Sujani Mill, Coimbatore-641 028, T.N. ... Defendants -- 1 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.24/2021 2 Appearance:- Mrs.Hasmita D. Kapadia Advocate for the plaintiff. Exparte against Defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C.R. NO.61). DATE : 05.02.2022 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit instituted by the plaintiff under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 against the defendant. 2. The suit claim of the plaintiff is narrated in nutshell as under: The Plaintiff is a Proprietor of Messrs. Krishna Metal Corporation and doing business of Ferrous and None Ferrous metals. Defendant no.1 is proprietor and Defendant no.2 is an authorized signatories of Messrs Shri. Vijyalaxmi Industries. Pursuant to defendant’s purchase orders for supply of various goods of metals which are described in detail in the suit, plaintiff sold and delivered goods as per defendant’s specifications through transporter Sri. Balaji Roadlines (Regd.), with delivery challans, which were received and acknowledged by the defendants without any protest for quality and quantity till date. The plaintiff in due course of business raised invoices and sold and delivered goods to the defendant totally to the sum of Rs.83,759/-. -- 2 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.24/2021 3 3. The defendant issued two cheques for discharging legal liability to pay the sum against the invoices but the same got dishonored on presentation in bank for the reason of “ funds insufficient” . The statutory notice u/s. 138 of N.I.Act has been given by the plaintiff advocate to the defendant on dd. 13.3.2018. But inspite of giving assurance, the defendant failed to make the payment of outstanding dues. The final notice though advocate came to be issued to the defendant on dtd.18.9.2019 for payment admitted liability of outstanding dues of Rs.83,759/- together with interest at the rate of 24% p.a . The defendants failed to remit the balance outstanding dues even after receipt of notice. The plaintiff averred that the defendants are liable to pay the outstanding amount with interest. 4. Thus, the plaintiff has filed the present suit against the defendants for recovery. It is averred that the defendants are liable to pay a sum of Rs.1,40,715/- with interest on the principal amount of Rs.83,759/- at the rate of 24% p.a to the plaintiff from the date of suit till its realization. Hence, this suit. 5. The suit summons were duly served on the defendants but they failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment. 6. The following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:- Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS. 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount against the Amount of Rs.1,40,715/-with -- 3 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.24/2021 4 defendants ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? interest @ 24% per annum on the principal sum. 2. What order and decree? As per final order. REASONS 7. In order to establish the suit claim, the plaintiff has filed following documentary evidence below Exh.07 i.e the list of documents: Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 1 Copy of purchase order dated 19.09.2017,12.02.017, 24.11.2017 Exh.7/1 2 Copy of defendants Email dated 19.9.2017,12.7.2107, 24.11.2017 Exh. 7/2 3 Certificate under section 65B of Indian Evidence Act. Exh. 7/3 4 Copy of Tax invoice No. 042/2017- 18 dtd. 29.9.2017, 056/17- 18/2017-18 dated 24.10.2017 and 073/17-18/2017-18 dated 27/11/2017. Exh. 7/4 5 L.R.No.3828487,3760244, 3762853. Exh. 7/5 6 Delivery Challan No. 042/17-18 dated 29/10/2017. 056/17-18 - and dated 24.10.2017 Exh. 7/6 7 Copy of ledger statement of plaintiff Exh. 7/7 8 Original Cheque dated 13.12.2017 for Rs.15,554/- Exh. 7/8 9. Original Cheque dated 28.12.2017 fo Rs.68,205/- Exh. 7/9 10 Original Dishonor memo dated 15.02.2018 Exh. 7/10 -- 4 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.24/2021 5 Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 11 Original Dishonor memo dated 15.2.2019 Exh. 7/11 12 Record copy of plaintiff’s notice through its advocate dated 13.3.2018 addressed to the defendants alongwith acknowledgment. Exh. 7/12 13 Record copy of plaintiff’s final notice through its advocate dated 18.9.2019 alongwith acknowledgment. Exh. 7/13 AS TO POINT NO.1: 8. This is a summary suit which is not contested by the defendant. The plaintiff has produced various documents on record. Further, he has filed affidavit below Exh.05 regarding service of writ of summons to the defendant. Claim affidavit filed below Exh.06. The documents produced on record by the plaintiff shows that the defendant received the goods covered with the invoices below Exh.07. Further, it reveals from the record that the said transaction took place from the month of September -2017 to November -2017 and the notice/ letter of demand was issued to the defendant on dtd.18.9.2019 and the suit is filed on 9.11.2020. As such, the plaintiff’s claim in the suit is well within limitation. 9. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit- 07 goes to establish that plaintiff has supplied goods to the defendants as per their instructions and the defendants failed to repay the balance amount of Rs.83,759/-, though received the letter of demand from the -- 5 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.24/2021 6 plaintiff. Said amount is not repaid by the defendants. Therefore, defendants are liable to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.83,759/- with interest to the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff the amount of Rs.1,40,715/- is calculated by them as the outstanding amount by adding the interest at the rate of 24% p.a. and other charges. In this background, I have arrived at the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.1,40,715/- from the defendants. 10. According to the plaintiff the outstanding dues against the defendants are Rs.1,40,715/- and said amount is calculated alongwith interest at the rate of 24% p.a and charges till the date of filing of the suit. The interest rate is endorsed on the invoices issued by the plaintiff. So the total outstanding amount is Rs.1,40,715/-. Apart from said amount which is due against the defendants on the date of filing of the suit, the plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 24% per annum on the principal amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of interest may exceed 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case the transaction is a commercial one and there is contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. As per the agreed terms mentioned on the invoice below Exh.07, defendants are liable to pay the interest at the rate of 24% p.a. Therefore, I hold, the rate of interest at the rate of 24% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum adjudged i.e. amount of Rs.83,759/-. Hence, point no.1 is answered in the affirmative. -- 6 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.24/2021 7 AS TO POINT NO.2: 11. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,40,715/- from the defendants with interest at the rate of 24% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.83,759/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the defendants. Hence, in answer to point no.2, I proceed to pass the following order: ORDER 1. The defendants shall pay Rs.1,40,715/- (Rs. On Lac Forty Thousand Seven Hundred Fifteen only) to the plaintiff, with interest at the rate of 24% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.83,759/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. The defendants do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. (A.H. Kashikar) AD-HOC Judge, City Civil Court, Date :05/02/2022 Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 05/02/2022 Typed on : 05/02/2022 Signed on : 05/02/2022 -- 7 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.24/2021 8 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 05/02/2022 02.00 p.m. ( K.M. Rana ) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 05/02/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 05/02/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 05/02/2022 -- 8 of 8 --
