Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Mr Prashant SalianVsMr Rajesh Purohit

CNR MHCC010050472019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 08th November 2019

TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100163/2019
Registration Date
03 May 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 11-06-2019
    Business: Ms. Bhanushali, advocate for the plaintiff present. As today is the first date in the matter, on request of Ms. Bhanushali, for taking further steps, adjd to 12/06/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2019
    
    Date: 12-06-2019
    Business: Ms. Bhanushali, Advocate for plaintiff present. Ms. Bhanushali, prays for issue of warrant u/o XXI Rule 54 of CPC, without issue of notice stating that the Exe. Application is filed within two years of passing Decree. Ms. Bhanushali, states that the property sought to be attached is free from all the encumbrances and belongs to defendant. In view of this issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 10/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2019
    
    Date: 10-10-2019
    Business: Ms. Memon, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Exe.application marked as Exh-A(Colly). Ms. Memon states that the warrant of attachment has been executed and tendered Sheriff Report bearing no.KKN/A-74735/1310/2019, dt.09/09/2019, taken on record and marked as Exh-B. On request of Ms. Memon, for taking further steps, adjd to 14/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2019
    
    Date: 14-10-2019
    Business: Ms. Memon, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Ms. Memon prays for issue of warrant of arrest stating that Defendant has not satified the decree dipached issue of warrant of attachment u/o. XXI Rule 54 of CPC. However, attention of Ms. Memon is drawn to the fact that the warrant of attachment has already been executed and avenue of issue of warrant of sale is open to decree holder. Hence, Ms. Memon seeks time to take further steps and on her request adjd to 7/11/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019
    
    Date: 07-11-2019
    Business: Shri. Ansul Bhuta, advocate for the plaintiff present.
    On request of Shri. Bhuta, for taking further steps, adjd to 08/11/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 08-11-2019
    
    Date: 08-11-2019
    Business: Plaintiff present.
    Plaintiff has tendered application for sale, taken on record and marked as Exh-C.
    He has also tendered affidavit in support of issue of warrant of sale, taken on record and marked as Exh-D.
    Upon perusing the affidavit and upon hearing plaintiff, issue warrant of sale as prayed for. Warrant of sale to remain alive till completion of sale proceedings. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out appropriate proceedings, if any third party obstructed during the Sale proceedings. Exe.application stands disposed off accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 08-11-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104603/2019
    Filing Date: 03-05-2019
    First Hearing Date: 11th June 2019
    Decision Date: 08th November 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.