Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 30 Jan 2019 · CNR MHCC010050232018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: :1: Summary Suit No.564/2018 Received on : 17.04.2018 Registered on : 04.06.2018 Decided on : 30.01.2019 Duration : Y M D 00 09 14 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 564 OF 2018 CNR NO.: MHCC010050232018 Falco Auto Corporation, ] A proprietary firm ] Having its office at ] 22, Dilip Niwas, ] Benham Hall Lane ] Opera House, Mumbai – 400 004 ] Through its Proprietor ] Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur Chadha ] Aged 49 years, Indian, ] Inhabitant of Mumbai ] ….Plaintiff. Versus 1. Shahagadkar Motors, ] Proprietor firm having their ] Address at Near Sai Mandir ] Jalna Road, Beed – 431 122 ] Maharashtra State ] 2. Mr. Shahagadkar Amol ] Shivrudraappa, ] adult, Indian Inhabitant ] proprietor of Defendant No.1 ] -- 1 of 6 -- :2: Summary Suit No.564/2018 Shahagadkar Motors ] r/at Near Sai Mandir ] Jalna Road, Beed – 431122 ] Maharashtra State. ]….Defendants. Appearances: Advocate Ms. Ashnil for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.9) DATED : 30th JANUARY, 2019. [ J U D G M E N T ] Plaintiff case in short is as under : 1. Plaintiff supplied goods to defendant from time to time on credit note. Plaintiff has further stated that defendants have a running credit account in the account books of the plaintiff operated in the due course of business. Plaintiff has raised bills of each and every consignment for payment and the defendants have acknowledged the receipt of such bills raised by the plaintiff. Plaintiff has further stated that defendants had issued cheques as consideration for goods supplied to plaintiff, but cheques issued by defendants were dishonored with the remark “Dishonoured for insufficient balance” by the banker. Therefore, plaintiff issued legal notice calling upon defendants to repay outstanding amount. Therefore, plaintiff filed present suit. 2. Though defendants are legally served with summons they failed to appear, therefore, suit has proceeded exparte against both of the defendants. 3. Heard the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. -- 2 of 6 -- :3: Summary Suit No.564/2018 4. Following points arise for determination and their findings followed by reasons are as stated below. Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to get amount of Rs.50,230/ from defendants along with interest @ 18% p.a. on the amount of Rs.46,757/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation ? ...Partly in the affirmative. 2. What order and Decree ? ...As per final order REASONS 5. Plaintiff has filed evidence in the form of affidavit of Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur Chadha (P.W.1) below Exh.2. Plaintiff relied upon the following documents as documentary evidence which are as under : Sr. No. Exhibits Particulars 1. Exh.5 (Colly.) Original invoice No.308 dated 25.10.2017 for Rs.9,250/ alongwith its lorry receipt No.06999390 dated 30.10.2017 2. Exh.6 (Colly.) Invoice No.315 dated 27.10.2017 for Rs.6,495/ alongwith its lorry receipt No.06999638 dated 31.10.2017 3. Exh.7 (Colly.) Invoice No.319 dated 03.11.2017 for Rs.31,112/ alongwith its lorry receipt No.76235 dated 30.10.2017 4. Exh.8 Original two cheques alongwith its 2 bank return memos. 5. Exh.9 Original accounts statement of the plaintiff with the defendant 6. Exh.10 Original Legal demand Notice served to the defendant 7. Exh.11 Speed Post receipt. -- 3 of 6 -- :4: Summary Suit No.564/2018 8. Exh.12 Sealed unserved speed post packet. AS TO POINT NOS. 1 AND 2: 6. Mrs. Kamaljit Kaur Chadha (P.W.1) has stated in her evidence filed in the form of evidence that against the defendants valid and confirmed order the plaintiff sold and supplied goods to the defendants from time to time on credit basis. She has further stated that the defendants had issued two cheques in her favour bearing Nos. 27649 dated 20.02.2017 for Rs.20,000/ and another cheque No.027650 dated 28.02.2018 for Rs.23,000/ both drawn on Poornawadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank, alongwith bank return memos with remarks “dishonoured for insufficient funds”. 7. She has further stated that defendants has paid Rs.5000/ vide cash on 03.01.2018 and thereafter not paid a single penny and has duly admitted his liability and thus acknowledges the outstanding amount as their debt. She has further stated that her Advocate served on the defendants a Legal demand notice dated 17.03.2018, which was unserved. She has further stated that there is now due and payable by the defendants to the plaintiff the sum Rs.46,757/ being the principal amount alongwith the amount of interest @ 18% per annum from one month of credit limit being 30.11.2017 till filing of the present suit as per the particulars of claim. Plaintiff has adduced corroborating documents which are invoices, cheques and Account Statement of defendant with plainitff. It appears, all the averments in the plaint, oral evidence and documentary evidence lead by plaintiff has remained unchallenged by defendants. The oral evidence of plaintiff is corroborated by documentary evidence. Therefore, plaintiff has proved that defendants have failed to pay outstanding loan amount with -- 4 of 6 -- :5: Summary Suit No.564/2018 interest. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to get sum of Rs.50,230/ from both the defendants. 8. It appears that as per Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it will be proper to direct defendants to give interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.46,757/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. Hence, answer point No.1 partly in the affirmative and pass following Order: ORDER 1. Suit is partly decreed with cost. 2. Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are jointly directed to pay amount of Rs. 50,230/ t o plaintiff along with interest @ 9% p.a. on the amount of Rs.46,757/ from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee be refunded as per rules. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 30.01.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 30.01.2019 Transcribed on : 30.01.2019 Signed on : 30.01.2019 -- 5 of 6 -- :6: Summary Suit No.564/2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 02.02.2019 At 5:52 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.09) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 30.01.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 30.01.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 02.02.2019 -- 6 of 6 --
