Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

KAMLESH JAYANTILAL JAINVsVishwanath Bapu Ladhe

CNR MHCC0100502120182-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 23rd October 2021

TrustJury record updated 12 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100095/2018
Registration Date
11 Apr 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1KAMLESH JAYANTILAL JAIN

    Respondent

    1. 1Vishwanath Bapu Ladhe

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 20-04-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  Shri. Jain prays for issue of warrant under order XXI rule 46 of CPC without issuing notice, stating that earlier E.A.No.586/2014 was filed within 2 years of Decree and the present E.A. is in continuance of the same.  Hence, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 20/07/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2018

Date: 20-07-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  For return of warrant, adjd to 01/09/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 01-09-2018

Date: 01-09-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  On request of Mr. Jain, adjd to 19/09/2018, for taking further steps.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2018

Date: 19-09-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  On request of Mr. Jain, adjd to 09/10/2018, for taking further steps.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2018

Date: 09-10-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  On request of Mr. Jain, adjd to 16/10/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2018

Date: 16-10-2018

Date: 27-11-2018
Business: plff. and his adv. absent.
deft. and his adv. absent.
Matter is adjd. to.25.03.2019 for hearing the adv. of D/H.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2019

Date: 25-03-2019
Business: plff. and his adv. absent.
deft. and his adv. absent.
kb at 2.45 p.m
L.O. at 3.00 p.m
Same appearance
Matter is adjd. to. 15.07.2019 for hearing the adv. of D/H.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2019

Date: 15-07-2019
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjd. to.13/09/2019  for Hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2019

Date: 13-09-2019
Business: Court is vacant, hence board is discharge.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2019

Date: 17-10-2019
Business: Both the parties and their advocates are absent.
Hence adjd for hearing on EA to 10.01.2020.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2020

Date: 10-01-2020
Business: DH and his Ld. advocate are absent when the matter is called on for hearing at 11.10 a.m.  Hence kept for dismissal on next date.
Adjd to 27.02.2020 for dismissal.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2020

Date: 27-02-2020
Business: None for D.H.  .
None for J.D. .
Court busy in other matters. Hence, adjourned.
D.H. and his Ld. advocate are absent when the matter is called on for hearing at 11.20 a.m.  Hence kept for dismissal on next date.
Adjd to 08-04-2020  for dismissal
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2020

Date: 08-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2020

Date: 20-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 30-05-2020

Date: 30-05-2020
Business: National Lockdown
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2020

Date: 17-06-2020
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2020

Date: 11-08-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2020

Date: 09-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2020

Date: 05-12-2020
Business: None present.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2021

Date: 25-01-2021
Business: court is on leave
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2021

Date: 20-03-2021
Business: None for DHR.
Matter stands Adj for Dismissal Order to 21/06/2021.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2021

Date: 21-06-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2021

Date: 02-08-2021
Business: None for DHR since long.
Matter stands Adj for Dismissal to 16/10/2021.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2021

Date: 16-10-2021
Business: Holiday declared on 16/10/2021 and 18/10/2021 as per office order 213 of 2021 dated 12/10/2021.
Hence board discharge and adjourned to 23/10/2021.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2021

Date: 23-10-2021
Business: None present for DHR.  Execution application is pertaining to decree arising out of summary suit u/o 37 of the CPC for recovery of amount.  Since 25/03/2019, DHR and his Adv remain absent.
Hence since 10/01/2020, Execution application was adjourned for dismissal order.  Thereafter also DHR and his Adv are absent.  Today they are also absent.  It seems that plff is not interested in prosecuting the Execution application.
Hence Execution application No. 95/2018 is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.  As EA No. 95/2018 is  continuation of EA 586/2014, EA 586/2014 stands disposed of accordingly.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 23-10-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103809/2018
Filing Date: 11-04-2018
First Hearing Date: 20th April 2018
Decision Date: 23rd October 2021
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    23 Oct 2021
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 23.10.2021
07
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. S. T. SOOR
(C. R. No. 2)
EA 95/2018 None present for DHR. Execution application is pertaining
to decree arising out of summary suit u/o 37 of the CPC for
recovery of amount. Since 25/03/2019, DHR and his Adv
remain absent.
Hence since 10/01/2020, Execution application was
adjourned for dismissal order. Thereafter also DHR and his
Adv are absent. Today they are also absent. It seems that
plff is not interested in prosecuting the Execution
application.
Hence Execution application No. 95/2018 is dismissed in
default for want of prosecution. As EA No. 95/2018 is
continuation of EA 586/2014, EA 586/2014 stands
disposed of accordingly.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    23 Oct 2021
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 23.10.2021
07
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. S. T. SOOR
(C. R. No. 2)
EA 95/2018 None present for DHR. Execution application is pertaining
to decree arising out of summary suit u/o 37 of the CPC for
recovery of amount. Since 25/03/2019, DHR and his Adv
remain absent.
Hence since 10/01/2020, Execution application was
adjourned for dismissal order. Thereafter also DHR and his
Adv are absent. Today they are also absent. It seems that
plff is not interested in prosecuting the Execution
application.
Hence Execution application No. 95/2018 is dismissed in
default for want of prosecution. As EA No. 95/2018 is
continuation of EA 586/2014, EA 586/2014 stands
disposed of accordingly.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.